Skip to main content
Download PDF

Autotaxin levels in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid are associated with inflammatory and fibrotic biomarkers and the clinical outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Journal of Intensive Care volume 9, Article number: 44 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Autotaxin (ATX) is a secreted glycoprotein that is widely present in extracellular biological fluids and has been implicated in many inflammatory and fibrotic diseases. However, the clinical impact of the release of ATX in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains unclear.

Methods

Serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) levels of ATX, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, fibronectin, oncostatin M (OSM), and SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) were collected from 52 patients with ARDS within 24 h of diagnosis. All cytokines were measured by Magnetic Luminex Assay. BALF albumin (BA) and serum albumin (SA) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

Serum ATX, MMP-7, and BALF IL-8 levels were significantly higher in patients who did not survive than in those who survived up to 28 days after diagnosis of ARDS (P < 0.05). BALF and serum ATX levels were correlated with IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-7 levels in BALF and serum, respectively. In addition, BALF ATX was positively correlated with BALF TNF-α, fibronectin, OSM, and SPARC as well as the BA/SA ratio, while serum ATX was correlated with severity of illness based on the SOFA score and PaO2/FIO2 ratio. Furthermore, serum ATX was better able to predict 28-day ARDS-related mortality (area under the curve 0.744, P < 0.01) than the SOFA score, APACHE II score, or PaO2/FIO2 ratio. Serum ATX independently predicted mortality in a univariate Cox regression model (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The serum ATX level is a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with ARDS. BALF ATX is associated with pulmonary biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis, suggesting a role of ATX in the pathogenesis of ARDS.

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and fatal complication of critical illness and is characterized by diffuse interstitial inflammation, non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and arterial hypoxemia [1, 2]. Despite decades of research effort, the mortality rate remains high in the range of 35–46% [3], particularly in patients who present with a fibroproliferative lung response [4]. An increasing body of research has demonstrated robust collagen synthesis in the lungs of patients with ARDS as early as 24 h after onset of the illness [5, 6]. Histological assessment of the lungs in patients with ARDS has clearly demonstrated that fibroproliferation is present early in a substantial proportion of patients [7]. At present, there is no therapy that specifically targets the dysregulated response that ultimately leads to respiratory failure. Therefore, understanding early signals that predict the long-term outcome in patients with ARDS may prove beneficial for predicting the need for more aggressive treatment and to identify novel therapeutic strategies.

Autotaxin (ATX) is a secreted glycoprotein [8] that catalyzes the hydrolysis of lysophosphatidylcholine to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) [9, 10]. LPA plays an important role in many inflammatory diseases, including in vascular homeostasis, skeletal and stromal remodeling, lymphocyte trafficking, and immune regulation [11]. ATX is present in a variety of tissues, including adipose tissue, the central nervous system, reproductive organs, lung, kidney, pancreas, and biological fluids, including blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) [12,13,14]. ATX expression is reportedly increased in patients with chronic liver disease and a shorter overall survival time [15] and in synovial fibroblasts from patients with rheumatoid arthritis in comparison with those from healthy controls [16]. Elevated ATX activity in plasma has recently been demonstrated to predict higher 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis [17]. Oikonomou et al. detected increased concentrations of ATX in a murine model of pulmonary fibrosis and in fibrotic human lungs, and genetic deletion of ATX from bronchial epithelial cells or macrophages and pharmacological inhibition of ATX can attenuate the severity of disease [18, 19]. GLPG1690, an ATX inhibitor, was reported to improve the prognosis by attenuating the decline in forced vital capacity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in a phase IIa randomized placebo-controlled trial [20]. However, the clinical significance of ATX in patients with ARDS remains unclear.

The objective of this study was to determine the link between ATX and ARDS and to identify the clinical value of ATX as a molecular biomarker of the status and risk of subsequent mortality in patients with ARDS by measuring ATX levels in BALF and serum and assessing the correlation of these levels with inflammatory and fibrotic indicators, disease severity, and patient outcomes.

Methods

Study design and subjects

This single-center cohort study was performed in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The study protocol was designed according to the requirements of the Chinese Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 2017.195). The study participants were patients aged > 18 years with a diagnosis of ARDS based on the Berlin criteria [21] who were treated at our institution between September 2017 and August 2018. Informed written consent was obtained from the legal representatives of all patients. Severity of illness was determined after the onset of ARDS using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.

Data extraction, collection of samples, and outcome measures

Demographic and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were collected for all study participants. BALF and blood samples were obtained within 24 h of diagnosis of ARDS. The outcome (mortality within 28 days) was recorded.

BALF samples were obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy (with 100 mL of 0.9% saline solution sequentially instilled and suctioned in 20 mL portions) from a subsegment of the right middle lobe of the lung and recovered at a rate of 30–50% according to the procedure described in the 2012 American Thoracic Society guidelines [22]. After collecting BALF into tubes, the fluid retrieved was filtered through sterile gauze and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove mucus and cells. The supernatants were aliquoted and frozen at −80 °C until analysis. Blood was collected into a vacutainer tube, stored immediately at 4 °C, allowed to clot, and then centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. Multiple aliquots of serum were frozen at −80 °C until measurement.

Quantification of cytokine and albumin levels

The concentrations of BALF and serum ATX, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, fibronectin, oncostatin M (OSM), and SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) were measured using a Human Magnetic Luminex Assay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) on a Bio-Plex 200 suspension array system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Serum and BALF albumin concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a human albumin ELISA kit (Develop; Donglin Sci & Tech Development Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China) with a detection range of 0.156–110 mg/mL. The BALF albumin to serum albumin (BA/SA) ratio was calculated as an index of lung permeability. These examinations were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

After the normality test, the data were summarized as the mean and standard deviation or as the median (interquartile range). When comparing two groups, an independent samples t test was used to evaluate normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney test to examine non-normally distributed data. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine correlations among variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify predictive values for surviving patients. Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests were used to compare survival rates. The association between the serum ATX level and 28-day mortality was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients with ARDS

Fifty-two patients with a diagnosis of ARDS were enrolled in the study. The characteristics at enrollment and outcomes in the study population are summarized in Table 1. Twenty-one of the 52 patients enrolled died during their hospital stay or within 28 days of diagnosis of ARDS. Non-survivors were older than survivors but there was no significant between-group difference in sex or BMI. Pneumonia was the most common etiology of ARDS in both survivors and non-survivors. There were more patients with indirect ARDS (caused by surgery, sepsis, trauma, hemorrhagic shock, acute pancreatitis, extra-pulmonary tumor, cerebrovascular disease, or pesticide poisoning) than direct ARDS (caused by pneumonia or pulmonary contusion) in the non-surviving group. SOFA scores were higher in the non-surviving group than in the surviving group (12.95 ± 3.58 vs 9.61 ± 2.87, P = 0.010, Table 1). However, there was no significant difference in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio, APACHE II score, or the tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, or pH values between survivors and non-survivors (Table 1). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in BALF or serum ATX according to whether ARDS was the result of direct or indirect lung injury (P > 0.05; Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Similarly, no difference in BALF or serum ATX was found between direct and indirect lung injury in either the surviving or non-surviving subgroups (P > 0.05, Additional file 1: Table S1). Moreover, non-survivors were significantly more likely to have impairment of the hepatic (P = 0.006), renal (P = 0.034), and cardiovascular (P = 0.002) systems as well as coagulation disorders (P = 0.003; Additional file 1: Table S2).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with ARDS
Full size table

Comparison of studied biomarkers between survivors and non-survivors

The values for the mediators investigated in the BALF and serum of survivors and non-survivors are shown in Table 2. The serum ATX level was markedly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (44.79 ± 13.38 ng/mL vs. 35.09 ± 13.89 ng/mL, P = 0.015, Table 2, Fig. 1A). There was no significant difference in BALF ATX between non-survivors and survivors (Fig. 1B). Serum MMP-7 and BALF IL-8 levels were higher in non-survivors than in survivors (Table 2; MMP-7, P = 0.013, Fig. 1C; IL-8, P = 0.032, Fig. 1D). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in BALF or serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, SPARC, OSM, or fibronectin or in BALF MMP-7 or serum IL-8 levels (P > 0.05, Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of biomarkers according to survival status
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of ATX levels, serum IL-8, and BALF MMP-7 in survivors and non-survivors of ARDS. Serum ATX was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (A). There was no significant difference in the BALF ATX level according to survival status in patients with ARDS (B). Serum MMP-7 (C) and BALF IL-8 (D) levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ATX, autotaxin; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; IL-8, interleukin-8; MMP-7, matrix metalloproteinase-7

Full size image

Association of ATX with biomarkers of inflammation or fibrosis and the BA/SA ratio

Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between ATX and ARDS-related biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis (Table 3). BALF ATX levels were positively associated with IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MMP-7, fibronectin, OSM, and SPARC levels, while serum ATX levels were positively correlated with serum IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-7 levels. However, serum TNF-α, fibronectin, OSM, and SPARC levels were not significantly associated with serum ATX levels. A positive correlation was found between BALF levels of ATX and the BA/SA ratio. There was no correlation between the serum ATX level and the BA/SA ratio.

Table 3 Correlations between ATX and a panel of biomarkers
Full size table

Association of the ATX level with severity of ARDS

The relationships between ATX and markers of ARDS severity were analyzed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Serum ATX levels were correlated with the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (rho −0.299, P = 0.0314, Fig. 2A) and SOFA score (rho 0.307, P = 0.0267, Fig. 2B). However, there was no statistically significant correlation between the BALF ATX level and the SOFA score or PaO2/FIO2 ratio (Table 4). Similarly, no relationship was found between BALF and serum ATX levels and APACHE II scores (Table 4; Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation of serum ATX level with severity of ARDS. The serum ATX level showed a significant negative correlation with the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (A) and a positive correlation with the SOFA score (B) but not with the APACHE II score (C). APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ATX, autotaxin; FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2, arterial oxygen tension; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Full size image
Table 4 Correlation of BALF and serum ATX levels with SOFA and APACHE II scores and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with ARDS
Full size table

Association of the ATX level with outcome of ARDS

In view of the relationship observed between the serum ATX level and the severity of ARDS, the ability of the serum ATX level to predict mortality was explored by ROC curve analysis. A serum ATX level with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.744 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.603–0.884, P = 0.0031, Fig. 3A) could predict 28-day mortality better than BALF IL-8 (AUC 0.649, 95% CI 0.490–0.808, P = 0.0811, Fig. 3A) or serum MMP-7 (AUC 0.702, 95% CI 0.548–0.856, P = 0.0142, Fig. 3A). Furthermore, using the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and PaO2/FIO2 ratio to separately predict 28-day mortality, we obtained respective AUC values of 0.723 (95% CI 0.580–0.867, P = 0.0059, Fig. 3A), 0.613 (95% CI 0.454–0.772, P = 0.1630, Fig. 3A), and 0.526 (95% CI 0.355–0.698, P = 0.7512, Fig. 3A), suggesting that the predictive ability of serum ATX was higher than that of the typical indicators associated with the severity of ARDS. Moreover, in combination with serum ATX, the combined AUC for the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and PaO2/FIO2 ratio increased from 0.788 (95% CI 0.658–0.918, P = 0.0005) to 0.822 (95% CI 0.697–0.946, P < 0.0001; Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ability of serum ATX to predict mortality in patients with ARDS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the ability of the serum ATX level to predict mortality in patients with ARDS was higher than that of serum MMP-7 (A), BALF IL-8 (A), the SOFA score (A), the APACHE II score (A), or the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (A). A combination of the serum ATX level and the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and PaO2/FIO2 ratio could help to predict the prognosis of ARDS (B). Kaplan–Meier curves show that the survival rate of patients stratified with a cutoff value of 36.96 ng/mL for serum ATX was significantly lower than that of patients with a lower ATX level (P < 0.0001, log-rank test) (C). APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ATX, autotaxin; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; IL-8, interleukin-8; MMP-7, matrix metalloproteinase-7; PaO2, arterial oxygen tension; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Full size image

When the serum ATX level was used to predict the prognosis, ROC curve analysis identified a cutoff value of 36.96 ng/mL with sensitivity and specificity values of 76.19% (95% CI 0.55–0.89) and 74.19% (95% CI 0.57–0.86), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that a higher serum ATX value was associated with a higher risk of death (P < 0.0001, Fig. 3C). The SOFA score was significantly higher in the subgroup with a higher serum ATX level (> 36.96 ng/mL) than in the subgroup with a lower serum ATX level (12.46 ± 3.66 vs. 9.68 ± 2.96, P = 0.004, Additional file 1: Table S4).

A univariate Cox regression model was built to assess the relationship between the serum ATX level and the outcome in patients with ARDS. Table 5 shows that the SOFA score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.234, 95% CI 1.084–1.404, P = 0.001), APACHE II score (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.026–1.186, P = 0.008), and serum ATX level (HR 2.605, 95% CI 1.530–4.435, P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of 28-mortality in patients with ARDS. In multivariate analysis, only the APACHE II score (HR 1.098, 95% CI 1.017–1.186, P = 0.017, Table 5) and serum ATX level remained independently associated with 28-day mortality (per 20 ng/mL, HR 2.479, 95% CI 1.200–5.121, P = 0.014, Table 5).

Table 5 Cox proportional hazards models for prediction of 28-day mortality based on the ATX level and severity score
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the potential value of ATX as a predictor of the prognosis in patients with ARDS. We investigated the differences in serum and BALF ATX levels between patients with ARDS who survived and those who did not and found significant differences in serum ATX, serum MMP-7, and BALF IL-8 levels between survivors and non-survivors. More importantly, we demonstrated that serum ATX levels were independently associated with the SOFA score and PaO2/FIO2 ratio, which are widely used indicators of ARDS severity, and that there was a relationship between an elevated serum ATX level and a higher risk of mortality in patients with ARDS. These findings suggest that an increased serum ATX level is associated with more clinically severe ARDS and an adverse outcome. Furthermore, we found that ATX levels were associated with biomarkers of inflammation and fibrosis, including IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MMP-7, OSM, SPARC, and fibronectin. On balance, these results demonstrate the predictive significance of ATX in ARDS and may help to identify novel therapeutic strategies for patients with this disease.

Some investigations during the past decade have addressed the potential role of ATX in several pulmonary diseases. Elevated ATX staining and activity were detected in biopsies and serum samples from patients with lung cancer [23] and there was an increase in BALF ATX levels in patients with asthma [24] and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [18]. Furthermore, there was a report of an increased BALF ATX level in a murine model of LPS-induced acute lung injury [25]. However, the clinical significance of ATX in patients with ARDS has not been investigated in detail. As is well known, the pathophysiology of ARDS is multifactorial and includes pulmonary inflammation, barrier disruption, interstitial and airspace edema, cell injury, and cell death. Lung injury can increase as the disease progresses through the exudative and proliferative phases, leading to a fibrotic phase and worsening lung function [1]. As previously described, ATX, a secreted lysophospholipase D that generates the bioactive lipid LPA, has been confirmed to play a pathological role in pulmonary inflammation in asthma [24] and lung fibrosis in IPF [18]. Therefore, we sought to explore the relationship between ATX and a panel of biomarkers previously implicated in the pathogenesis of ARDS. It has been demonstrated that TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 are involved in the pathogenesis of inflammation in ARDS [26]. Moreover, MMP-7 has been reported to direct and confine neutrophil influx to sites of injury by mediating shedding of syndecan-1 complexes from the mucosal surface in acute lung injury [27]. In this study, BALF and serum ATX levels were closely correlated with those of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and MMP-7, indicating that ATX may play a role in the regulation of pulmonary inflammation in ARDS. Furthermore, fibronectin, OSM, and SPARC have been reported to participate in pathological situations such as tissue remodeling and pulmonary fibrosis in ARDS [28,29,30,31,32]. Grenier et al. reported that OSM was released by alveolar polymorphonuclear neutrophils in acute lung injury [33]. Furthermore, OSM can induce production of collagen as well as proliferation and reduced apoptosis in human lung fibroblasts [34] depending on the activation status of STAT3 [35]. Meanwhile, single-cell RNA sequencing identified increased gene expression of SPARC in the monocytes of patients with ARDS [29], and overexpression of SPARC in IPF potentially drove tissue fibrosis via induction of PAI-1 expression, leading to a pool of myofibroblasts that are resistant to apoptosis and, consequently, a dysregulated milieu in the extracellular matrix [36]. In our study, all mediators of fibrosis in BALF were significantly associated with BALF ATX, indicating that ATX may have a role in the pulmonary fibrosis component of ARDS. Overall, ATX may play an important role in the regulation of inflammation and fibrosis in ARDS, but the specific mechanism needs to be explored in future studies.

Various scoring systems, including SOFA, APACHE II, and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio, have been widely used in clinical practice to predict the outcome of ARDS. However, these scoring systems have several shortcomings in terms of predicting disease progression because of the interobserver variability arising from complicated calculations and subjective judgments [37, 38]. Therefore, there is a need for biomarkers that have potential prognostic ability in ARDS and can be easily obtained. In this study, a significantly elevated serum ATX level was found more often in non-survivors than in survivors, suggesting that serum ATX is associated with the progression of ARDS. Significant correlations were observed between the serum ATX level and the SOFA score and PaO2/FiO2 ratio. However, the BALF ATX concentration was not significantly different between patients who survived and those who did not and was not correlated with the SOFA score or the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the serum or BALF ATX level according to whether lung injury was direct or indirect in either the surviving or non-surviving subgroups, suggesting that the cause of ARDS (direct or indirect lung injury) is not the main factor affecting the prognostic ability of serum and BALF ATX. One potential reason may be that the serum ATX level, but not BALF ATX level, was correlated with the SOFA score. Given that the presence of comorbidities and multiorgan dysfunction are associated with mortality in ARDS, the serum ATX level may be more closely related to the severity of multiorgan dysfunction, and thereby help to predict the likelihood of mortality in patients with ARDS. In addition to the higher serum ATX level and higher SOFA score, there were significantly more liver, renal, cardiovascular, and coagulation injury in non-survivors. Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in the serum ATX level in patients with kidney or liver disease [39, 40]. In order to analyze the factors contributing to the elevated serum ATX level, we performed a binary logistic regression analysis of the association of serum ATX level (low or high based on a cutoff value of 36.96 ng/mL) with the severity of lung injury (based on a PaO2/FIO2 ratio > 200 mmHg or ≤ 200 mmHg), multiorgan damage (with or without liver, renal, cardiovascular, nervous system, or coagulation injury), and the etiology of ARDS (direct or indirect injury). We found that the severity of lung injury was significantly correlated with the serum ATX level (P = 0.029, Additional file 1: Table S3), indicating that lung injury may be one of the main causes of the elevated serum ATX. Cardiovascular injury may also have played a role in the change in serum ATX level in this study (P = 0.025) and warrants more clinical and mechanistic studies in the future.

Furthermore, we found that the prognostic value of serum ATX was higher than that of the biomarkers previously reported in ARDS, including serum MMP-7 and BALF IL-8, and the common indicators of ARDS (the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and PaO2/FIO2 ratio). In combination with serum ATX, the predictive ability of these three typical indicators combined can be increased. Serum ATX levels can be easily and quickly obtained in clinical settings. For risk assessment, we found that a higher SOFA score could predict higher mortality in patients with ARDS, which is in agreement with previous findings [41, 42]. In our study, patients with ARDS and a serum ATX level > 36.96 ng/mL had a higher SOFA score and a higher 28-day mortality rate according to the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Notably, the serum ATX level was significantly associated with the risk of ARDS-related death in a univariate Cox regression model, indicating that each 20-ng/mL increment in the serum ATX level increased the risk of death from ARDS by nearly threefold. The multivariate Cox regression model did not identify the PaO2/FIO2 ratio or the SOFA score as a significant prognostic factor. One potential reason for this finding might be the small sample size, which limited our ability to assess the predictive ability of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and SOFA score in the study. Another reason may be that the PaO2/FIO2 ratio mainly reflects the severity of local lung injury and the SOFA score focuses on six organic variables at the time of grading, whereas the APACHE II contains features reflecting both acute and chronic conditions and is more comprehensive when estimating risk [43]. Therefore, when used to predict mortality in patients with ARDS, APACHE II performed better in the multivariate Cox model. No correlation was found between the ATX level and the APACHE II score. The AUC of APACHE II for predicting 28-day mortality was only 0.613 (P > 0.05, Fig. 3A). One possible reason for this finding is that ATX may be more sensitive than the APACHE II score for predicting the outcome of patients with ARDS. Overall, our results suggest that ATX may be a strong independent predictor that can be used to supplement SOFA and APACHE II scores and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio when evaluating the severity of ARDS and the likely outcome for the patient.

This study has several limitations that need to be overcome in future research. First, the small sample size might have limited our ability to analyze the ATX level in different ARDS phenotypes. Second, we only measured ATX levels in the first 24 h after enrollment. Therefore, the relationship between the ATX level and progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with ARDS was not followed by imaging or pathological observation. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations are needed to further explore the role of ATX in the pathogenesis of ARDS.

Conclusions

Overall, in this study, the ATX level showed a good correlation with a panel of biomarkers previously associated with pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. The serum ATX level was significantly correlated with disease severity and appeared to have good prognostic value when applied alone or in combination with the current methods used to predict the outcome of ARDS (SOFA, APACHE II, and PaO2/FIO2). Our findings strongly suggest that the serum ATX level can be used to predict the prognosis in patients with ARDS. This study also advances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the regulation of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in ARDS. Further clinical and mechanistic studies are warranted to elucidate the specific role of ATX in the pathogenesis of ARDS.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

APACHE:

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ATX:

Autotaxin

AUC:

Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve

BA:

BALF albumin

BALF:

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

FIO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

HR:

Hazard ratio

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

IL:

Interleukin

LPA:

Lysophosphatidic acid

MMP-7:

Matrix metalloproteinase-7

OSM:

Oncostatin M

PaO2 :

Arterial oxygen tension

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SA:

Serum albumin

SOFA:

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

SPARC:

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

References

  1. Thompson BT, Chambers RC, Liu KD. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):562–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1608077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967;2(7511):319–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90168-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burnham EL, Janssen WJ, Riches DW, Moss M, Downey GP. The fibroproliferative response in acute respiratory distress syndrome: mechanisms and clinical significance. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(1):276–85. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00196412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall RP, Bellingan G, Webb S, Puddicombe A, Goldsack N, McAnulty RJ, et al. Fibroproliferation occurs early in the acute respiratory distress syndrome and impacts on outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(5):1783–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.2001061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meduri GU, Tolley EA, Chinn A, Stentz F, Postlethwaite A. Procollagen types I and III aminoterminal propeptide levels during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in response to methylprednisolone treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(5 Pt 1):1432–41. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9801107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulpa PA, Dive AM, Mertens L, Delos MA, Jamart J, Evrard PA, et al. Combined bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy: safety and yield in ventilated patients. Eur Respir J. 2003;21(3):489–94. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00298303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stefan C, Jansen S, Bollen M. NPP-type ectophosphodiesterases: unity in diversity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30(10):542–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2005.08.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Umezu-Goto M, Kishi Y, Taira A, Hama K, Dohmae N, Takio K, et al. Autotaxin has lysophospholipase D activity leading to tumor cell growth and motility by lysophosphatidic acid production. J Cell Biol. 2002;158(2):227–33. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200204026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aoki J. Mechanisms of lysophosphatidic acid production. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15(5):477–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi JW, Herr DR, Noguchi K, Yung YC, Lee CW, Mutoh T, et al. LPA receptors: subtypes and biological actions. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50(1):157–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbayianni E, Kaffe E, Aidinis V, Kokotos G. Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, as a promising therapeutic target in chronic inflammation and cancer. Prog Lipid Res. 2015;58:76–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2015.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dusaulcy R, Rancoule C, Gres S, Wanecq E, Colom A, Guigne C, et al. Adipose-specific disruption of autotaxin enhances nutritional fattening and reduces plasma lysophosphatidic acid. J Lipid Res. 2011;52(6):1247–55. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M014985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Magkrioti C, Galaris A, Kanellopoulou P, Stylianaki EA, Kaffe E, Aidinis V. Autotaxin and chronic inflammatory diseases. J Autoimmun. 2019;104:102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaffe E, Katsifa A, Xylourgidis N, Ninou I, Zannikou M, Harokopos V, et al. Hepatocyte autotaxin expression promotes liver fibrosis and cancer. Hepatology. 2017;65(4):1369–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28973.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikitopoulou I, Oikonomou N, Karouzakis E, Sevastou I, Nikolaidou-Katsaridou N, Zhao Z, et al. Autotaxin expression from synovial fibroblasts is essential for the pathogenesis of modeled arthritis. J Exp Med. 2012;209(5):925–33. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20112012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sexton T, Chalhoub G, Ye S, Morris W, Annabathula R, Dugan A, et al. Autotaxin activity predicts 30-day mortality in sepsis patients and correlates with platelet count and vascular dysfunction. Shock. 2020;54(6):738–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oikonomou N, Mouratis MA, Tzouvelekis A, Kaffe E, Valavanis C, Vilaras G, et al. Pulmonary autotaxin expression contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;47(5):566–74. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2012-0004OC.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matralis AN, Afantitis A, Aidinis V. Development and therapeutic potential of autotaxin small molecule inhibitors: from bench to advanced clinical trials. Med Res Rev. 2019;39(3):976–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maher TM, van der Aar EM, Van de Steen O, Allamassey L, Desrivot J, Dupont S, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (FLORA): a phase 2a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(8):627–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30181-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.5669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer KC, Raghu G, Baughman RP, Brown KK, Costabel U, du Bois RM, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(9):1004–14. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201202-0320ST.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magkrioti C, Oikonomou N, Kaffe E, Mouratis MA, Xylourgidis N, Barbayianni I, et al. The autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid axis promotes lung carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2018;78(13):3634–44. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park GY, Lee YG, Berdyshev E, Nyenhuis S, Du J, Fu P, et al. Autotaxin production of lysophosphatidic acid mediates allergic asthmatic inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(8):928–40. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201306-1014OC.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mouratis MA, Magkrioti C, Oikonomou N, Katsifa A, Prestwich GD, Kaffe E, et al. Autotaxin and endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhatia M, Moochhala S. Role of inflammatory mediators in the pathophysiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Pathol. 2004;202(2):145–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Q, Park PW, Wilson CL, Parks WC. Matrilysin shedding of syndecan-1 regulates chemokine mobilization and transepithelial efflux of neutrophils in acute lung injury. Cell. 2002;111(5):635–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01079-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ware LB, Koyama T, Zhao Z, Janz DR, Wickersham N, Bernard GR, et al. Biomarkers of lung epithelial injury and inflammation distinguish severe sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R253. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang Y, Rosborough BR, Chen J, Das S, Kitsios GD, Mc Verry BJ, et al. Single cell RNA sequencing identifies an early monocyte gene signature in acute respiratory distress syndrome. JCI Insight. 2020;5(13). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.135678.

  30. Richards CD, Botelho F. Oncostatin M in the regulation of connective tissue cells and macrophages in pulmonary disease. Biomedicines. 2019;7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040095.

  31. Limper AH, Roman J. Fibronectin. A versatile matrix protein with roles in thoracic development, repair and infection. Chest. 1992;101(6):1663–73. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dos Santos CC. Advances in mechanisms of repair and remodelling in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(4):619–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0963-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grenier A, Combaux D, Chastre J, Gougerot-Pocidalo MA, Gibert C, Dehoux M, et al. Oncostatin M production by blood and alveolar neutrophils during acute lung injury. Lab Investig. 2001;81(2):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3780220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Scaffidi AK, Mutsaers SE, Moodley YP, McAnulty RJ, Laurent GJ, Thompson PJ, et al. Oncostatin M stimulates proliferation, induces collagen production and inhibits apoptosis of human lung fibroblasts. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;136(5):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagahama KY, Togo S, Holz O, Magnussen H, Liu X, Seyama K, et al. Oncostatin M modulates fibroblast function via signal transducers and activators of transcription proteins-3. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013;49(4):582–91. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2012-0460OC.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chang W, Wei K, Jacobs SS, Upadhyay D, Weill D, Rosen GD. SPARC suppresses apoptosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibroblasts through constitutive activation of beta-catenin. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(11):8196–206. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.025684.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Polderman KH, Girbes AR, Thijs LG, Strack van Schijndel RJ. Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units: problems and pitfalls in the use of APACHE II and suggestions for improvement. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(1):47–50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01763.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fery-Lemonnier E, Landais P, Loirat P, Kleinknecht D, Brivet F. Evaluation of severity scoring systems in ICUs--translation, conversion and definition ambiguities as a source of inter-observer variability in Apache II, SAPS and OSF. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21(4):356–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Iwata Y, Kitajima S, Yamahana J, Shimomura S, Yoneda-Nakagawa S, Sakai N, et al. Higher serum levels of autotaxin and phosphatidylserine-specific phospholipase A1 in patients with lupus nephritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(2):231–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Takemura K, Takizawa E, Tamori A, Nakamae M, Kubota H, Uchida-Kobayashi S, et al. Association of serum autotaxin levels with liver fibrosis in patients pretreatment and posttreatment with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36(1):217–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wu TT, Yuan A, Chen CY, Chen WJ, Luh KT, Kuo SH, et al. Cardiac troponin I levels are a risk factor for mortality and multiple organ failure in noncardiac critically ill patients and have an additive effect to the APACHE II score in outcome prediction. Shock. 2004;22(2):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.shk.0000132484.97424.32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu Z, Li X, Huang Y, Mao P, Wu S, Yang B, et al. The predictive value of plasma galectin-3 for ARDS severity and clinical outcome. Shock. 2017;47(3):331–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.00000000000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Falcao ALE, Barros AGA, Bezerra AAM, Ferreira NL, Logato CM, Silva FP, et al. The prognostic accuracy evaluation of SAPS 3, SOFA and APACHE II scores for mortality prediction in the surgical ICU: an external validation study and decision-making analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0488-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYGD18006); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81701564 and 81900080); and the Key Research and Development Program from Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2020YFS0146).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lijuan Gao and Xiaoou Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary Disease, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China, and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

    Lijuan Gao, Xiaoou Li, Hao Wang, Yue Liao, Ke Wang, Jun Hu, Mengxin Cheng, Zijian Zeng, Tao Wang & Fuqiang Wen

  2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

    Yongfang Zhou

Authors
  1. Lijuan Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoou Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yue Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yongfang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ke Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mengxin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zijian Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fuqiang Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WFQ and WT designed the study. GLJ, LXO, WH, LY, ZYF, WK, HJ, CMX, and ZZJ collected the data. GLJ and LXO analyzed, interpreted the patient data, and wrote the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tao Wang or Fuqiang Wen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the legal representatives of all patients. The study protocol was designed according to the requirements of the Chinese Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 2017.195).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Figure S1. Comparison of ATX levels in patients with ARDS according to whether lung injury was direct or indirect. Table S1. Comparison of ATX levels according to whether lung injury was direct or indirect in either survivors or non-survivors of ARDS. Table S2. Information about organ injury according to survival status. Table S3. Binary logistic regression analysis of low and high serum ATX levels. Table S4. Comparison of disease severity according to the serum ATX level.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, L., Li, X., Wang, H. et al. Autotaxin levels in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid are associated with inflammatory and fibrotic biomarkers and the clinical outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. j intensive care 9, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00559-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00559-3

Keywords

Journal of Intensive Care

ISSN: 2052-0492