Skip to main content

Hypomagnesemia in critically ill patients



Magnesium (Mg) is essential for life and plays a crucial role in several biochemical and physiological processes in the human body. Hypomagnesemia is common in all hospitalized patients, especially in critically ill patients with coexisting electrolyte abnormalities. Hypomagnesemia may cause severe and potential fatal complications if not timely diagnosed and properly treated, and associate with increased mortality.

Main body

Mg deficiency in critically ill patients is mainly caused by gastrointestinal and/or renal disorders and may lead to secondary hypokalemia and hypocalcemia, and severe neuromuscular and cardiovascular clinical manifestations. Because of the physical distribution of Mg, there are no readily or easy methods to assess Mg status. However, serum Mg and the Mg tolerance test are most widely used. There are limited studies to guide intermittent therapy of Mg deficiency in critically ill patients, but some empirical guidelines exist. Further clinical trials and critical evaluation of empiric Mg replacement strategies is needed.


Patients at risk of Mg deficiency, with typical biochemical findings or clinical symptoms of hypomagnesemia, should be considered for treatment even with serum Mg within the normal range.


Magnesium (Mg) is essential for life and plays a crucial role in several biochemical and physiological processes in the human body. Hypomagnesemia is common in hospitalized patients (7–11%) and even more frequent in patients with other coexisting electrolyte abnormalities [1,2,3] and in critically ill patients [4, 5]. Hypomagnesemia can potentially cause fatal complications including ventricular arrhythmia, coronary artery spasm, and sudden death. It also associates with increased mortality and prolonged hospitalization [6, 7]. The role of Mg status and therapy in critically ill patients has previously been systematically reviewed elsewhere [8,9,10]. However, we here present a review article focusing on the Mg homeostasis and the physiological role of Mg in humans. We then present the different causes and clinical and biochemical manifestations of hypomagnesemia in critically ill patients and, finally, we discuss Mg therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting.

Magnesium homeostasis

Mg is the fourth most abundant cation in the human body and the second most abundant intracellular cation. A healthy human adult have a content of about 25 g or 1000 mmol Mg where approximately 60% stores in bones, 20% in muscles, 20% in soft tissues, 0.5% in erythrocytes, and 0.3% in serum [11]. About 70% of the plasma Mg is ionized or complexed to filterable ions, while 20% is bound to proteins. Figure 1 gives a general overview of the Mg homeostasis in the human body.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mg homeostasis. The figure gives an overview of the Mg homeostasis and the distribution of Mg throughout the human body including gastrointestinal absorption and renal excretion

Mg homeostasis in humans mainly involves the kidneys, the small bowel, and bones [12]. Gastrointestinal absorption and renal excretion are the most important mechanisms for controlling and regulating the Mg homeostasis. The cellular regulation of Mg uptake and release occurs slowly, and healthy individuals need to ingest about 0.15–0.2 mmol/kg/day to contain a normal Mg status. The intestinal absorption of dietary Mg depends on both intake and body Mg status and occurs via passive and active pathways [13, 14]. Presumably, only ionized Mg is absorbed. Active transcellular Mg uptake rely on specific Mg channels located in the large intestines [14, 15] including the transient receptor potential melastin (TRPM) 6 and TRPM 7. The passive absorption is driven by a favorable electrochemical gradient and occurs mainly paracellulary through leaky epithelia primarily located in the small intestines [14]. Additionally, the process of passive absorption interacts with the levels and absorption of calcium [14].

The kidneys are the primary site of Mg homeostasis and play a key role in regulating and maintaining Mg balance. Figure 2 illustrates the renal handling of Mg in humans. The normal fractional urinary excretion of filtered Mg is about 5% [16]. Mg reabsorption in the kidneys involves the proximal tubule, the thick ascending loop of Henle (TAL), and the distal tubule [17, 18]. TAL is the major site of Mg reabsorption and reabsorbs about 60–70% of filtered Mg [17, 18], and extracellular calcium sensing receptors modulate the Mg absorption through changes in the transepithelial voltage and alterations of the permeability of the paracellular tight junctions [18]. The mechanisms of basolateral transport into the interstitium are not fully understood. Moreover, the proximal tubule reabsorbs 15–20% of filtered Mg, and the distal tubule only 5–10% [17, 18], whereas there is no significant reabsorption of Mg in the collecting ducts [19].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Renal Mg handling. The figure gives an overview of the renal handling of Mg in the proximal convoluted tubule, loop of Henle, and distal convoluted tubule

Physiological role of magnesium

Mg is a crucial cofactor in several enzyme systems [20] including almost every aspect of biochemical metabolism (e.g., DNA and protein synthesis, glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation). The essential enzymes adenylate cyclase and sodium-potassium-adenosine triphosphatase depend on Mg for their normal function [21, 22]. Mg serves as a molecular stabilizer for RNA, DNA, and ribosomes. It is also suggested to modulate immune functions [23, 24], and changes in the level of Mg are reported to correlate with the levels of several immune mediators such as interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, and substance P [25,26,27]. Moreover, Mg are proven to contribute in several physiological processes such as maintaining stability across cell membranes, protein, and nucleic acid synthesis; regulating cardiac and smooth muscle tone; controlling of mitochondrial functions; and supporting cytoskeletal integrity [28].

Defining magnesium status

Normal serum concentration of Mg is 1.5 to 1.9 mEq/L [29]. Unfortunately, there are no readily and easy methods to assess Mg status. However, serum Mg and the Mg tolerance test are most widely used [30]. The serum Mg is easily available but may not adequately reflect the body Mg stores because of the physiological distribution of Mg. Notably, normal serum levels may be found even if a patient is intracellularly Mg depleted because intracellular stores are recruited to keep the serum levels within its range, however, only until the point where these stores cannot keep up. Although only free Mg is biologically active, most test measure total Mg concentrations, and hypoalbuminemic states may therefore lead to false low Mg levels.

The Mg tolerance test is probably the most accurate way to assess Mg status [31]. The test is used in special occasions for example if the clinical suspicion of Mg deficiency is strong and the serum Mg levels are normal. The test is performed by measuring the Mg in a 24-h urine collection, distribute parenteral Mg (often 2.4 mg/kg of lean body weight given over the initial 4 h of the second urine collection), and then repeat the 24-h urine collection. Patients with a normal Mg status will excrete the Mg load during the second urine collection. Retention of more than 20% of the administrated Mg is suggestive of deficiency. Performing the test both gives the diagnosis and treats a potential Mg deficiency. The Mg tolerance test could easily be implemented in ICU patients. However, patients with malnutrition, cirrhosis, diarrhea, or long-term diuretic use typically have a positive result and the test is not useful in the setting of renal Mg wasting or other renal dysfunctions.

An alternative to the total serum Mg and the Mg tolerance test is assessment of the ionized serum Mg2+ concentration which is the active form of Mg in plasma [32]. It has a significant protein bound fraction, similar to calcium, with the potential of large differences between total serum and ionized levels [33]. The estimation of ionized Mg levels in patients cannot be made by correcting for albumin [33]. Notably, it is still disputable whether levels of serum ionized Mg or total serum Mg should be used to follow-up Mg levels in critically ill patients [7, 33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Finally, the intracellular levels of Mg can be measured using circulating red blood cells, mononuclear cells, or skeletal muscle cells. Due to the lack of an accurate and robust method to measure Mg status in patients, the biochemical measurements should always be supported by a clinical assessment of patients at risk for Mg deficiency for timely and proper diagnosis and treatment.

Causes of hypomagnesemia in critically ill patients

The causes of hypomagnesemia in critically ill patients are mainly a result of gastrointestinal disorders or renal loss of Mg. Table 1 lists the differential diagnosis of Mg deficiency in the ICU patients.

Table 1 Differential diagnosis of Mg deficiency in the ICU setting

Gastrointestinal causes

Both the upper and lower intestinal tract fluid contain Mg. Therefore, loss of gastrointestinal fluids can cause Mg deficiency. Several conditions commonly seen in the ICU patients can cause gastrointestinal loss of Mg leading to significant Mg depletion, such as vomiting and nasogastric suction, diarrhea, enteritis, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal and biliary fistulas, intestinal surgery resections, and pancreatitis [41,42,43,44].

Renal causes

Many critically ill patients have hypomagnesemia caused by renal loss. The reabsorption of Mg2+ in the proximal tubule is proportional to tubular fluid flow and sodium reabsorption [17], and chronic parenteral fluid therapy, particularly with sodium-containing fluid, may therefore lead to Mg deficiency. The same mechanism may cause urinary wasting of Mg in osmotic diuresis. However, the most frequent cause of renal Mg wasting is medications, diuretics being particularly important [45]. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, osmotic agents, furosemide, bumetanide, and ethacrynic acid all increase Mg excretion [46], whereas the effect of thiazide diuretics on renal Mg handling is controversial [45]. Moreover, the aminoglycoside antibiotics [47], the chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin [48], and the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine [49] are all reported to cause renal Mg wasting potentially causing Mg deficiency. Notably, patients in the ICU often receive several different combinations of intravenous medications and might have impaired drug elimination capacity due to reduced kidney and/or lived function which together with potential drug-drug interactions might influence Mg homeostasis. This aspect should be considered by physicians treating ICU patients. Table 2 gives an overview of the drugs that potentially cause hypomagnesemia and their underlying mechanisms. Finally, metabolic acidosis due to diabetic ketoacidosis, starvation, or alcoholism also causes renal Mg wasting.

Table 2 Drugs associated with Mg deficiency and hypomagnesemia

Biochemical and clinical manifestations of hypomagnesemia

Hypomagnesaemia is often secondary to other disease processes or drugs and the features of the primary disease may mask the signs of an Mg deficiency. Thus, a high index of suspicion is warranted [50]. An overview of the biochemical and clinical manifestations of hypomagnesemia are given in Table 3.

Table 3 Clinical and biochemical effects of moderate to severe Mg deficiency and hypomagnesemia

Biochemical manifestations of hypomagnesemia


Hypokalemia is common in patients with Mg deficiency and about half of the patients with clinically potassium deficiency also have Mg depletion [51]. However, patients with Mg depletion have a renal loss of potassium which is caused by an increased potassium secretion in the connecting tubule and the cortical collecting tubule. In the kidneys, K+ is absorbed across the basolateral membrane via Na-K-ATPase and secreted into the lumen of the connecting tubule and cortical collecting tubule. This process is mediated by luminal potassium channels (ROMK). With a total lack of intracellular Mg2+, K+ ions move freely through the ROMK channels. At physiologic intracellular Mg2+ concentration, ROMK conducts more K+ ions inward than outward. Hypomagnesaemia is associated with reduction of intracellular Mg, which in turn will release this inhibitory effect on potassium efflux. Due to the high concentration of potassium in the cell, this will promote potassium from the cell into the lumen which in turn leads to increased loss of potassium in the urine [52].


Hypocalcemia is a well-known manifestation of Mg deficiency [53]. Patients with combined hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia also show low levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), and studies indicate that Mg deficiency inhibit the release of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with coexisting hypocalcemia. Moreover, parenteral Mg stimulate PTH secretion [54, 55], and it is therefore suggested that reduced PTH secretion is a key contributor to hypocalcemia in Mg deficiency [55]. Animal studies have suggested that bone resistance to PTH contributes in hypocalcemia in Mg deficiency and studies in isolated perfused bone have revealed that Mg depletion reduces production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) in bone with high levels of PTH [56]. Patients with Mg deficiency and hypocalcemia also present low levels of calcitriol (1.25-dihydroxyvitamin D) and together with impaired PTH secretion a reduced conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1.25-dihydroxyvitamin D in the kidneys is suspected [57].

Clinical manifestations of hypomagnesemia


Mg has several effects on the cardiac conduction system. It is an essential cofactor of the Na-K-ATP pump which controls the movement of sodium and potassium across cell membranes [58]; Mg levels therefore influence myocardial excitability. Typical electrocardiogram changes and dysrhythmias are most common [59]. Widening of the QRS complex and peaking of T waves are described in moderate Mg deficiency whereas prolongation of the PR interval, progressive widening of the QRS complex, and diminution of the T wave are seen in severe Mg depletion [19]. Low serum Mg has been correlated to increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery, and also an association between serum Mg and development of AF in individuals without cardiovascular disease is described [59]. Ventricular premature complexes, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation are more severe complications [60, 61], and these arrhythmias may be resistant to treatment [62]. Intracellular Mg depletion may be present even with normal serum Mg levels and must always be considered as a potential factor in arrhythmias. Other electrolyte disturbances such as potassium or calcium deficiency are often concurrent but not obligate [63, 64]. Notably, both cardiac glycosides such as digitalis and Mg deficiency inhibit Na-K-ATPase and their adaptive effect contributes to increased toxicity [65].

Patients with heart failure have an increased incidence of hypomagnesemia probably due to the use of diuretics (Table 2). Non-potassium-sparing diuretics reduce serum and total-body potassium and Mg. Low levels of Mg and potassium predispose for ventricular ectopic activity which is a predictor for arrhythmic death [66]. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding Mg levels and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure. A large prospective study did not find Mg depletion as an independent risk factor for death [67] whereas an association between low levels of serum Mg and cardiovascular mortality has been reported by others [68]. Mg supplementation has previously been suggested for patients with heart failure [69, 70].

Postoperative atrial fibrillation following coronary bypass (CAPG) occurs in 10–65% of the patients [71]. Hypomagnesemia is common after cardiac surgery and Mg levels drop significantly and remain decreased for about 24 h postoperatively [72,73,74]. The exact mechanisms are not known but may be due to hemodilution and renal wasting. Citrate in predeposited autologous blood may also contribute to the decrease in the serum Mg concentration [74]. Postoperative hypomagnesemia is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative arrhythmias and low cardiac index [73]. A meta-analysis of seven double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials demonstrated that intravenous Mg significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation [75]. Notably, severe complications such as hypotension, progressive respiratory failure, diminished deep tendon reflexes, complete heart block, and cardiac arrest have been reported in overdosing of Mg [76].

Recent studies investigating Mg therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) indicate that low serum Mg levels increases the frequency of arrhythmias [77] and that intravenous Mg supplements reduce the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in AMI [78]. Three large prospective studies have investigated the role of Mg after AMI. “The Leicester Intravenous Mg Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2),” from 1992, randomized 2316 patients with suspected AMI to receive Mg or placebo and found a 24% relative reduction in 28-day mortality rate in patients receiving Mg therapy compared to the placebo group [79]. The Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival Trial (ISIS-4) randomized 58,050 participants in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial study. The treatment comparisons were captopril vs placebo, mononitrate vs placebo, and intravenous Mg vs placebo. There was no significant reduction in 5 weeks mortality [80]. The MAGIC trial was published in 2002 with the purpose to investigate early administration of intravenous Mg to high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Over 6000 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were randomized to receive intravenous Mg or placebo and the study found no effect of early administration of intravenous Mg on 30-day mortality [81]. One of the main criticisms against ISIS-4 was the timing of the Mg administration as ISIS-4 randomized participants until 24 h after onset of symptoms whereas previously animal studies have stated that Mg must be given within 6 h after vessel occlusion [82, 83] for adequate effect. Moreover, Mg inhibits platelet activation by inhibiting Thromboxane A2 and interfering with the IIb-IIIa receptor complex [50], and Mg supplements are shown to inhibit platelet-dependent thrombosis in patients with coronary artery disease [84]. Based on the above, there are no indications of Mg in AMI as a routine but it may be considered in selected situations [85].


Animal models suggest a cerebroprotective effect of Mg [86] and Mg therapy given within 6 h of cerebral infarction probably reduce tissue damage [87]. Regarding human studies, the intravenous Mg efficacy in stroke trial (IMAGES) randomized 2589 patients to receive intravenous Mg or placebo within 12 h of stroke onset but this did not reduce mortality or disability [88]. Moreover, a study investigating administration of prehospital Mg sulfate in acute stroke (FAST-MAG) did not find reduction in disability at 90 days after disease onset [86]. Neither has intravenous Mg been found to improve clinical outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages [89].


Neuromuscular hyperexitability is often the first clinical manifestation in patients with hypomagnesemia [90]. Concomitant Mg and calcium deficiency enhance neurological symptoms, but also patients with isolated Mg deficiency present neuromuscular hyperexitability [50]. Other neuromuscular symptoms are tetanus with positive Chvostek and Trousseau signs, muscle spasms, and cramps [19] which probably all are due to lowering of the threshold for nerve stimulation [91]. Hypomagnesaemia may also affect neurons in the brain and cause seizures, likely due to increased glutamate-activated depolarization. A decrease of extracellular Mg2+ allows a greater influx of calcium in the presynaptic nerves and releases a greater amount of neurotransmitters [92, 93]. Choreiform and athetoid movements, vertigo, apathy, delirium, and vertical nystagmus are also described [94]. Vertical nystagmus is a rare but may be a diagnostically and useful sign of severe hypomagnesaemia. In absence of structural lesions in the cerebellum or vestibular device, vertical vertigo is only associated with severe hypomagnesaemia or thiamine deficiency [95].


Mg is established treatment of resistant asthma attacks [96, 97]. Mg increases the effect of salbutamol [98] through inhibiting Ca2+ influx by blocking the voltage-dependent calcium channels which then relaxes the smooth muscle [28]. Mg also has an immunoregulatory effect by reducing pro-inflammatory mediators and promoting synthesis of prostacyclin and nitric oxide which stimulates broncho- and vasodilatation [99, 100]. Both intravenous and nebulized Mg has been used in treating acute asthma attacks. A review of 16 trials and 838 patients from 2012 showed that nebulized MgSO4 combined with a nebulized beta2 agonist in adults did not provide a benefit in terms of lung function or need for hospitalization [101]. Another Cochrane review included 25 trials with a total of 2907 patients. The aim was to determine efficacy and safety of inhaled MgSO4 administered in acute asthma due to lung function and hospital admission. The authors’ concluded with a modest additional benefit for the use of inhaled β2-agonists and ipratropium bromide [102].

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have assessed the role of intravenous or nebulized MgSO4 in acute asthma. A large double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial from 2013 included 1109 participants randomized to receive intravenous Mg, nebulized Mg, or placebo. The aim was to determine whether intravenous or nebulized MgSO4 improve symptoms of breathlessness and reduce the need for hospital admission in adults with severe acute asthma. The authors concluded that nebulized MgSO4 has no role in the management of severe acute asthma in adults and suggested a limited role for intravenous MgSO4 [103]. Another review including 2313 patients from 14 studies concluded that a single infusion of MgSO4 reduced hospital admissions and improved lung function in adults with acute asthma who did not respond sufficiently to standard treatments [104]. Interestingly, low Mg intake has been associated with a higher prevalence of asthma [105].


Mg therapy has been used for decades as eclampsia prophylaxis. In 2002, the results from the “Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Eclampsia trial” (MAGPIE) were published. Ten thousand patients with preeclampsia were randomized to receive Mg therapy or placebo. The Mg therapy group showed significant fewer cases of eclampsia compared to the placebo group, maternal death was fewer among women who received Mg therapy, and Mg did not seem to give harmful side effects to either the mother or the fetus [106]. There are conflicting evidence regarding the correlation between Mg depletion and preeclampsia [107,108,109]. However, based on MAGPIE, it seems reasonably using Mg therapy in patients with preeclampsia although the cellular mechanisms remain to be fully understood.

Magnesium therapy

Because serum Mg not necessarily reflects the total body Mg status, patients at risk of magnesium deficiency or with symptoms consistent with hypomagnesaemia should be considered for treatment even with serum Mg within the normal range [19, 31]. The magnitude of Mg deficiency is hard to predict but may be 1–2 mEq/kg of body weight [50]. In general, mild hypomagnesemia with no or only mild symptoms can be treated with per oral supplement [110] whereas parenteral Mg supplementation is indicated if Mg concentration is < 0.5 mmol/L or if the patient presents with significant symptoms. For critically ill patients with mild to moderate hypomagnesemia, empirically derived “rules of thumb” suggest that the administration of 1 g (8 mEq) of intravenous Mg will increase the serum Mg concentration by 0.15 mEq/L within 18 to 30 h [111]. However, current practice of Mg replacement therapy is mainly based upon acute myocardial infarction trials (Table 4) which suggest an initial bolus (e.g., 2 g (16 mEq)) followed by continuous infusions up to 16 g (130 mEq) over 24 h [79, 112,113,114]. Severe hypomagnesemia may require treatment with doses until 1.5 mEq/kg; doses < 6 g MgSO4 can be given over a period of 8–12 h whereas higher doses should be administrated over a time period > 25 h [115]. The slow distribution of Mg in tissues and the rapidly renal excretion makes the infusion time crucial.

Table 4 Continues Mg infusions over 24 h

In the acute clinical settings with hemodynamically unstable patients, including patients with severe arrhythmias, established recommendations suggest giving 16 mEq (8 mmol) of Mg over 2–15 min followed by a continuous infusion [116, 117]. In the MAGPIE study [106], 32 mEq (4 g) Mg was initially given, followed by 8 mEq (1 g) per hour in women with preeclampsia [106]. Table 5 gives an overview of suggested Mg therapy in specific clinical setting. The evidence of using Mg as a routine in other critical conditions such as asthma or CAPG is still insufficient.

Table 5 Treatment with Mg in specific clinical settings

Patients with renal failure are at risk of developing hypermagnesemia and Mg treatment is therefore generally not recommended for these patients. However, Mg therapy should be considered in patients with moderately reduced glomerular filtration rate and severe Mg deficiency. The dose of Mg must be adjusted and patients should be carefully monitored both biochemically and clinically. High levels of Mg (> 4–5 mmol/L) may give muscle weakness, reduced respiration, and in worst case cardiac arrest. In case of intolerable intoxication; intravenous calcium (100–200 mg over 5–10 min) should be administrated as it antagonizes the neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of Mg [50, 115].


  • Mg deficiency is common in critically ill patients, may cause potentially fatal complications, and associates with increased mortality.

  • Mg deficiency in critically ill patients is mainly caused by gastrointestinal and/or renal disorders and may lead to secondary hypokalemia and hypocalcemia, and severe neuromuscular and cardiovascular clinical manifestations.

  • Because of the physical distribution of Mg, there are no readily or easy methods to assess Mg status. However, serum Mg and the Mg tolerance test are most widely used.

  • Patients at risk of Mg deficiency, with typical biochemical findings or clinical symptoms of hypomagnesemia, should be considered for treatment even with serum Mg within the normal range.

  • There are limited studies to guide intermittent therapy of Mg deficiency in critically ill patients but some empirical guidelines exist. Further clinical trials and critical evaluation of empiric Mg replacement strategies is needed.


  1. 1.

    Whang R, Oei TO, Aikawa JK, Watanabe A, Vannatta J, Fryer A, et al. Predictors of clinical hypomagnesemia. Hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, and hypocalcemia. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1794–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wong ET, Rude RK, Singer FR, Shaw ST Jr. A high prevalence of hypomagnesemia and hypermagnesemia in hospitalized patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;79:348–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hayes JP, Ryan MF, Brazil N, Riordan TO, Walsh JB, Coakley D. Serum hypomagnesaemia in an elderly day-hospital population. Ir Med J. 1989;82:117–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Reinhart RA, Desbiens NA. Hypomagnesemia in patients entering the ICU. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:506–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ryzen E, Wagers PW, Singer FR, Rude RK. Magnesium deficiency in a medical ICU population. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:19–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rubeiz GJ, Thill-Baharozian M, Hardie D, Carlson RW. Association of hypomagnesemia and mortality in acutely ill medical patients. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:203–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Soliman HM, Mercan D, Lobo SS, Melot C, Vincent JL. Development of ionized hypomagnesemia is associated with higher mortality rates. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1082–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fairley J, Glassford NJ, Zhang L, Bellomo R. Magnesium status and magnesium therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2015;30:1349–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fairley JL, Zhang L, Glassford NJ, Bellomo R. Magnesium status and magnesium therapy in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on arrhythmia prevention. J Crit Care. 2017;42:69–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jiang P, Lv Q, Lai T, Xu F. Does hypomagnesemia impact on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock. 2017;47:288–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Elin RJ. Assessment of magnesium status. Clin Chem. 1987;33:1965–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pham PC, Pham PA, Pham SV, Pham PT, Pham PM, Pham PT. Hypomagnesemia: a clinical perspective. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:219–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Quamme GA. Recent developments in intestinal magnesium absorption. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24:230–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fine KD, Santa Ana CA, Porter JL, Fordtran JS. Intestinal absorption of magnesium from food and supplements. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:396–402.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schweigel M, Martens H. Magnesium transport in the gastrointestinal tract. Front Biosci. 2000;5:D666–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sutton RA, Domrongkitchaiporn S. Abnormal renal magnesium handling. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1993;19:232–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Quamme GA, de Rouffignac C. Epithelial magnesium transport and regulation by the kidney. Front Biosci. 2000;5:D694–711.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cole DE, Quamme GA. Inherited disorders of renal magnesium handling. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:1937–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Agus ZS. Hypomagnesemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:1616–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wacker WE, Parisi AF. Magnesium metabolism. N Engl J Med. 1968;278:772–776 concl.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hexum T, Samson FE Jr, Himes RH. Kinetic studies of membrane (Na+-K+-Mg2+)-ATPase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970;212:322–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Grubbs RD, Maguire ME. Magnesium as a regulatory cation: criteria and evaluation. Magnesium. 1987;6:113–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Johnson JD, Hand WL, King-Thompson NL. The role of divalent cations in interactions between lymphokines and macrophages. Cell Immunol. 1980;53:236–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chaigne-Delalande B, Lenardo MJ. Divalent cation signaling in immune cells. Trends Immunol. 2014;35:332–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Weglicki WB, Phillips TM. Pathobiology of magnesium deficiency: a cytokine/neurogenic inflammation hypothesis. Am J Phys. 1992;263:R734–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Weglicki WB, Phillips TM, Freedman AM, Cassidy MM, Dickens BF. Magnesium-deficiency elevates circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and endothelin. Mol Cell Biochem. 1992;110:169–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Weglicki WB, Mak IT, Stafford RE, Dickens BF, Cassidy MM, Phillips TM. Neurogenic peptides and the cardiomyopathy of magnesium-deficiency: effects of substance P-receptor inhibition. Mol Cell Biochem. 1994;130:103–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA, Lewenstam A. Magnesium. An update on physiological, clinical and analytical aspects. Clin Chim Acta. 2000;294:1–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jahnen-Dechent W, Ketteler M. Magnesium basics. Clin Kidney J. 2012;5:i3–i14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Swaminathan R. Magnesium metabolism and its disorders. Clin Biochem Rev. 2003;24:47–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ryzen E, Elbaum N, Singer FR, Rude RK. Parenteral magnesium tolerance testing in the evaluation of magnesium deficiency. Magnesium. 1985;4:137–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Quamme GA. Laboratory evaluation of magnesium status. Renal function and free intracellular magnesium concentration. Clin Lab Med. 1993;13:209–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Koch SM, Warters RD, Mehlhorn U. The simultaneous measurement of ionized and total calcium and ionized and total magnesium in intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2002;17:203–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sanders GT, Huijgen HJ, Sanders R. Magnesium in disease: a review with special emphasis on the serum ionized magnesium. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:1011–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lanzinger MJ, Moretti EW, Wilderman RF, El-Moalem HE, Toffaletti JG, Moon RE. The relationship between ionized and total serum magnesium concentrations during abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:245–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fiser RT, Torres A Jr, Butch AW, Valentine JL. Ionized magnesium concentrations in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2048–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Huijgen HJ, Soesan M, Sanders R, Mairuhu WM, Kesecioglu J, Sanders GT. Magnesium levels in critically ill patients. What should we measure? Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114:688–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Elming H, Seibaek M, Ottesen MM, Torp-Pedersen C, Holm E, Thode J, et al. Serum-ionised magnesium in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Relation to cardiac arrhythmias, left ventricular function and mortality. Magnes Res. 2000;13:285–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wilkes NJ, Mallett SV, Peachey T, Di Salvo C, Walesby R. Correction of ionized plasma magnesium during cardiopulmonary bypass reduces the risk of postoperative cardiac arrhythmia. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:828–834, table of contents.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yeh DD, Chokengarmwong N, Chang Y, Yu L, Arsenault C, Rudolf J, et al. Total and ionized magnesium testing in the surgical intensive care unit—opportunities for improved laboratory and pharmacy utilization. J Crit Care. 2017;42:147–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    LaSala MA, Lifshitz F, Silverberg M, Wapnir RA, Carrera E. Magnesium metabolism studies in children with chronic inflammatory disease of the bowel. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985;4:75–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nyhlin H, Dyckner T, Ek B, Wester PO. Plasma and skeletal muscle electrolytes in patients with Crohn’s disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 1985;4:531–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hanna S. Plasma magnesium in health and disease. J Clin Pathol. 1961;14:410–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Smith GA, Tompkins RK. Biliary magnesium loss in the postoperative patient. Arch Surg. 1974;109:77–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ryan MP. Diuretics and potassium/magnesium depletion. Directions for treatment. Am J Med. 1987;82:38–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Quamme GA, Dirks JH. The physiology of renal magnesium handling. Ren Physiol. 1986;9:257–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Alexandridis G, Liberopoulos E, Elisaf M. Aminoglycoside-induced reversible tubular dysfunction. Pharmacology. 2003;67:118–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Buckley JE, Clark VL, Meyer TJ, Pearlman NW. Hypomagnesemia after cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:2347–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Thompson CB, June CH, Sullivan KM, Thomas ED. Association between cyclosporin neurotoxicity and hypomagnesaemia. Lancet. 1984;2:1116–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Tong GM, Rude RK. Magnesium deficiency in critical illness. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20:3–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Whang R, Whang DD, Ryan MP. Refractory potassium repletion. A consequence of magnesium deficiency. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:40–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Huang CL, Kuo E. Mechanism of hypokalemia in magnesium deficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2649–52.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Griffin TP, Murphy M, Coulter J, Murphy MS. Symptomatic hypocalcaemia secondary to PTH resistance associated with hypomagnesaemia after elective embolisation of uterine fibroid. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013.

  54. 54.

    Chase LR, Slatopolsky E. Secretion and metabolic efficacy of parthyroid hormone in patients with severe hypomagnesemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974;38:363–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rude RK, Oldham SB, Singer FR. Functional hypoparathyroidism and parathyroid hormone end-organ resistance in human magnesium deficiency. Clin Endocrinol. 1976;5:209–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Freitag JJ, Martin KJ, Conrades MB, Bellorin-Font E, Teitelbaum S, Klahr S, et al. Evidence for skeletal resistance to parathyroid hormone in magnesium deficiency. Studies in isolated perfused bone. J Clin Invest. 1979;64:1238–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rude RK, Adams JS, Ryzen E, Endres DB, Niimi H, Horst RL, et al. Low serum concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in human magnesium deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985;61:933–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Skou JC, Butler KW, Hansen O. The effect of magnesium, ATP, P i, and sodium on the inhibition of the (Na + + K + )-activated enzyme system by g-strophanthin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971;241:443–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Khan AM, Lubitz SA, Sullivan LM, Sun JX, Levy D, Vasan RS, et al. Low serum magnesium and the development of atrial fibrillation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2013;127:33–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sueta CA, Clarke SW, Dunlap SH, Jensen L, Blauwet MB, Koch G, et al. Effect of acute magnesium administration on the frequency of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1994;89:660–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Tsuji H, Venditti FJ Jr, Evans JC, Larson MG, Levy D. The associations of levels of serum potassium and magnesium with ventricular premature complexes (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:232–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kasaoka S, Tsuruta R, Nakashima K, Soejima Y, Miura T, Sadamitsu D, et al. Effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate on cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with low serum ionized magnesium. Jpn Circ J. 1996;60:871–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Panahi Y, Mojtahedzadeh M, Najafi A, Ghaini MR, Abdollahi M, Sharifzadeh M, et al. The role of magnesium sulfate in the intensive care unit. EXCLI J. 2017;16:464–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Banai S, Tzivoni D. Drug therapy for torsade de pointes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:206–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Young IS, Goh EM, McKillop UH, Stanford CF, Nicholls DP, Trimble ER. Magnesium status and digoxin toxicity. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;32:717–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Cooper HA, Dries DL, Davis CE, Shen YL, Domanski MJ. Diuretics and risk of arrhythmic death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1999;100:1311–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Eichhorn EJ, Tandon PK, DiBianco R, Timmis GC, Fenster PE, Shannon J, et al. Clinical and prognostic significance of serum magnesium concentration in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure: the PROMISE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:634–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Adamopoulos C, Pitt B, Sui X, Love TE, Zannad F, Ahmed A. Low serum magnesium and cardiovascular mortality in chronic heart failure: a propensity-matched study. Int J Cardiol. 2009;136:270–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Ceremuzynski L, Gebalska J, Wolk R, Makowska E. Hypomagnesemia in heart failure with ventricular arrhythmias. Beneficial effects of magnesium supplementation. J Intern Med. 2000;247:78–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Fuentes JC, Salmon AA, Silver MA. Acute and chronic oral magnesium supplementation: effects on endothelial function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2006;12:9–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Maisel WH, Rawn JD, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:1061–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Aglio LS, Stanford GG, Maddi R, Boyd JL 3rd, Nussbaum S, Chernow B. Hypomagnesemia is common following cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1991;5:201–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Parra L, Fita G, Gomar C, Rovira I, Marin JL. Plasma magnesium in patients submitted to cardiac surgery and its influence on perioperative morbidity. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;42:37–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Inoue S, Akazawa S, Nakaigawa Y, Shimizu R, Seo N. Changes in plasma total and ionized magnesium concentrations and factors affecting magnesium concentrations during cardiac surgery. J Anesth. 2004;18:216–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Gu WJ, Wu ZJ, Wang PF, Aung LH, Yin RX. Intravenous magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 7 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. Trials. 2012;13:41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Cavell GF, Bryant C, Jheeta S. Iatrogenic magnesium toxicity following intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate: risks and strategies for prevention. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015.

  77. 77.

    Dyckner T. Serum magnesium in acute myocardial infarction. Relation to arrhythmias. Acta Med Scand. 1980;207:59–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Rasmussen HS, Suenson M, McNair P, Norregard P, Balslev S. Magnesium infusion reduces the incidence of arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Clin Cardiol. 1987;10:351–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Woods KL, Fletcher S, Roffe C, Haider Y. Intravenous magnesium sulphate in suspected acute myocardial infarction: results of the second Leicester Intravenous Magnesium Intervention Trial (LIMIT-2). Lancet. 1992;339:1553–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    ISIS-4 Collaborative Group. ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) collaborative group. Lancet. 1995;345:669–85.

  81. 81.

    Antman EM. The Magnesium in Coronaries (MAGIC) Trial Investigators. Early administration of intravenous magnesium to high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction in the magnesium in coronaries (MAGIC) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1189–96.

  82. 82.

    Woods KL, Abrams K. The importance of effect mechanism in the design and interpretation of clinical trials: the role of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2002;44:267–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Vassalle C, Battaglia D, Vannucci A, Chatzianagnostou K, Landi P, Arvia C, et al. Low magnesium is not a significant predictor of hard events in acute myocardial infarction. BBA Clin. 2016;5:130–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Shechter M, Merz CN, Paul-Labrador M, Meisel SR, Rude RK, Molloy MD, et al. Oral magnesium supplementation inhibits platelet-dependent thrombosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:152–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Shechter M. Magnesium and cardiovascular system. Magnes Res. 2010;23:60–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Saver JL, Starkman S, Eckstein M, Stratton SJ, Pratt FD, Hamilton S, et al. Prehospital use of magnesium sulfate as neuroprotection in acute stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:528–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Muir KW. Magnesium for neuroprotection in ischaemic stroke: rationale for use and evidence of effectiveness. CNS Drugs. 2001;15:921–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Muir KW, Lees KR, Ford I, Davis S. Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:439–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Dorhout Mees SM, Algra A, Vandertop WP, van Kooten F, Kuijsten HA, Boiten J, et al. Magnesium for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (MASH-2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:44–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Nadler JL, Rude RK. Disorders of magnesium metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 1995;24:623–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Frankenhaeuser B, Meves H. The effect of magnesium and calcium on the frog myelinated nerve fibre. J Physiol. 1958;142:360–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Mody I, Lambert JD, Heinemann U. Low extracellular magnesium induces epileptiform activity and spreading depression in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurophysiol. 1987;57:869–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Augustine GJ, Charlton MP, Smith SJ. Calcium action in synaptic transmitter release. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1987;10:633–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Flink EB. Magnesium deficiency. Etiology and clinical spectrum. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1981;647:125–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Saul RF, Selhorst JB. Downbeat nystagmus with magnesium depletion. Arch Neurol. 1981;38:650–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ, Bousquet J, Drazen JM, FitzGerald M, et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:143–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    British Thoracic Society, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British guideline on the management of asthma. Thorax. 2014;69(Suppl 1):1–192.

  98. 98.

    Turner DL, Ford WR, Kidd EJ, Broadley KJ, Powell C. Effects of nebulised magnesium sulphate on inflammation and function of the guinea-pig airway. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;801:79–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Del Castillo J, Engbaek L. The nature of the neuromuscular block produced by magnesium. J Physiol. 1954;124:370–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Kemp PA, Gardiner SM, March JE, Bennett T, Rubin PC. Effects of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester on regional haemodynamic responses to MgSO4 in conscious rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1994;111:325–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Powel C. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Knightly R. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Goodacre S, Cohen J, Bradburn M, Gray A, Benger J, Coats T. Intravenous or nebulised magnesium sulphate versus standard therapy for severe acute asthma (3Mg trial): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:293–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Kew K. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Britton J, Pavord I, Richards K, Wisniewski A, Knox A, Lewis S, et al. Dietary magnesium, lung function, wheezing, and airway hyperreactivity in a random adult population sample. Lancet. 1994;344:357–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L, Farrell B, Moodley J, Neilson J, et al. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1877–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Standley CA, Whitty JE, Mason BA, Cotton DB. Serum ionized magnesium levels in normal and preeclamptic gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:24–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Handwerker SM, Altura BT, Altura BM. Ionized serum magnesium and potassium levels in pregnant women with preeclampsia and eclampsia. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:201–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Frenkel Y, Weiss M, Shefi M, Lusky A, Mashiach S, Dolev E. Mononuclear cell magnesium content remains unchanged in various hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1994;38:220–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Yamamoto M, Yamaguchi T. Causes and treatment of hypomagnesemia. Clin Calcium. 2007;17:1241–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Hammond DA, Stojakovic J, Kathe N, Tran J, Clem OA, Erbach K, et al. Effectiveness and safety of magnesium replacement in critically ill patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit in an academic medical center: a retrospective, cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2017.doi:

  112. 112.

    Shechter M, Hod H, Chouraqui P, Kaplinsky E, Rabinowitz B. Magnesium therapy in acute myocardial infarction when patients are not candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:321–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Raghu C, Peddeswara Rao P, Seshagiri Rao D. Protective effect of intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction following thrombolytic therapy. Int J Cardiol. 1999;71:209–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Rasmussen HS, McNair P, Norregard P, Backer V, Lindeneg O, Balslev S. Intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1986;1:234–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Velissaris D, Karamouzos V, Pierrakos C, Aretha D, Karanikolas M. Hypomagnesemia in critically ill sepsis patients. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7:911–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, Kronick SL, Shuster M, Callaway CW, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122:S729–67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Tzivoni D, Banai S, Schuger C, Benhorin J, Keren A, Gottlieb S, et al. Treatment of torsade de pointes with magnesium sulfate. Circulation. 1988;77:392–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Quamme GA. Renal magnesium handling: new insights in understanding old problems. Kidney Int. 1997;52:1180–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Shah GM, Kirschenbaum MA. Renal magnesium wasting associated with therapeutic agents. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1991;17:58–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Lajer H, Kristensen M, Hansen HH, Christensen S, Jonassen T, Daugaard G. Magnesium and potassium homeostasis during cisplatin treatment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005;55:231–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Nijenhuis T, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Downregulation of Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) transport proteins in the kidney explains tacrolimus (FK506)-induced hypercalciuria and hypomagnesemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:549–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Schrag D, Chung KY, Flombaum C, Saltz L. Cetuximab therapy and symptomatic hypomagnesemia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1221–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Groenestege WM, Thebault S, van der Wijst J, van den Berg D, Janssen R, Tejpar S, et al. Impaired basolateral sorting of pro-EGF causes isolated recessive renal hypomagnesemia. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2260–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Vichot AA, Geller DS, Perazella MA. Progression of polycystic kidney disease in a kidney transplant. Kidney Int. 2013;83:533.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Hansen B, Bruserud Ø. Hypomagnesemia as a potentially life-threatening adverse effect of pantoprazole. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2016;2016(7):147-9.

  126. 126.

    Huycke MM, Naguib MT, Stroemmel MM, Blick K, Monti K, Martin-Munley S, et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate for foscarnet-induced ionized hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia in patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2143–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Ryman KM, Canada TW. Deficiencies of magnesium replacement in the critically ill. J Intensive Care Med 2017.doi:

  128. 128.

    Kraft MD, Btaiche IF, Sacks GS, Kudsk KA. Treatment of electrolyte disorders in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005;62:1663–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Dr. Øystein Bruserud for his valuable contributions.


No funding.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information




BAH and ØB did the literature search and wrote the manuscript together. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Øyvind Bruserud.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No approval is required.

Consent for publication

No consent is required.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, BA., Bruserud, Ø. Hypomagnesemia in critically ill patients. j intensive care 6, 21 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Magnesium
  • Critical illness
  • Intensive care unit
  • Arrhythmia
  • Potassium
  • Calcium