Skip to main content

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac arrest resuscitation practices and outcomes in non-COVID-19 patients

Abstract

The effect of changes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures in response to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) management and outcomes are unreported. In this multicenter retrospective study, we showed that median time to arrival of resuscitation team has increased and proportion of patients receiving first-responder CPR has lowered during this pandemic. IHCA during the pandemic was independently associated with lower return of spontaneous circulation OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.43–0.91), despite adjustment for lowered patient comorbidity and increased time to resuscitation team arrival. Changes to resuscitation practice in this pandemic had effects on IHCA outcomes, even in patients without COVID-19.

Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are poor [1]. Furthermore, changes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures have been recommended to reduce provider exposure to COVID-19 cross-infection [2]. These include donning personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to CPR, limiting personnel numbers, and determining appropriate CPR thresholds. The effects of these changes made in response to the pandemic on cardiac arrest management and outcomes are unreported.

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected audit data at two public Hong Kong hospitals compared the outcomes of adult IHCA who received CPR before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two 1-year periods: January 27, 2019 to January 26, 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and January 27, 2020 to January 26, 2021 (COVID-19) were compared. January 27, 2020 corresponds with the first reported critical case of COVID-19 in the territory. The primary objective was to compare time from arrest recognition to CPR, and arrival of resuscitation team. The secondary objective was to identify patient and management factors associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The study was approved by the Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2021.212).

During the study period there were 693 adult IHCA who received CPR, of which 630 were first cardiac arrest episodes. We analyzed the outcomes of 629 IHCA patients after excluding one patient with undocumented arrest time. The IHCA incidence rates were 1.6 and 1.37 per 1000 admissions before and during the pandemic, respectively (P = 0.017). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. No study patients had COVID-19. The results of univariate and multivariate analysis for factors associated with ROSC are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Patient characteristics and outcomes
Table 2 Factors associated with ROSC

Our results are consistent with a single-center study which showed lower IHCA survival during the pandemic [3]. However, inclusion of COVID-19 patients may have biased their conclusions since COVID-19 patients with IHCA rarely survive to discharge [1, 4]. In contrast, our study is multicenter, of larger size, and compared two 1-year periods, before and during COVID-19. During this pandemic, Hong Kong’s healthcare system has been challenged but not overwhelmed as occurred in other regions. Mortality of COVID-19 remains low at 1.8% [5]. Importantly, lack of COVID-19 patients in this study removes its potential as a confounder for IHCA outcomes. Thus, we could assess the effect of resuscitation practice changes on patient characteristics, timing of IHCA management and association with ROSC.

The incidence of IHCA and comorbidity among those who received CPR were lower during the pandemic, possibly due to proactive do-not-resuscitate order discussions [2]. Since the pandemic, our IHCA resuscitation teams were instructed to don respiratory PPE prior to CPR regardless of patients’ COVID-19 status or before arrival to isolation wards. The rationale was that patients may have asymptomatic disease and some patients with initial negative tests at admission may turn positive during their hospital stay. Therefore, the approach of first responders and resuscitation teams to PPE preparation was consistent even though they may not have known whether the arrested patient had COVID-19 at the time of arrest. Our data show this has increased resuscitation team arrival time and lowered the proportion of patients receiving first-responder CPR. Furthermore, we showed that arrest during the pandemic was independently associated with lower ROSC. This was despite adjustment for lowered patient comorbidity, increased time to resuscitation team arrival, and other well-established factors associated with ROSC, such as shockable rhythm.

We used ROSC rather than hospital mortality as our endpoint because of the low 5% survival. Although a limiting factor, survival rates were consistent with reported regional data [6]. We were also unable to assess changes in airway management during CPR as the data were inconsistently recorded. Nevertheless, our study demonstrated changes to resuscitation team practice in response to the pandemic had effects on IHCA outcomes, even in patients without COVID-19.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Approval from The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong—New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee will be required before sharing of data.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

IHCA:

In-hospital cardiac arrest

ROSC:

Return of spontaneous circulation

CPR:

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

PPE:

Personal protection equipment

References

  1. 1.

    Thapa SB, Kakar TS, Mayer C, Khanal D. Clinical outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(2):279–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Edelson DP, Sasson C, Chan PS, Atkins DL, Aziz K, Becker LB, Berg RA, Bradley SM, Brooks SC, Cheng A, et al. Interim guidance for basic and advanced life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: from the emergency cardiovascular care committee and get with the guidelines-resuscitation adult and pediatric task forces of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(25):e933–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Miles JA, Mejia M, Rios S, Sokol SI, Langston M, Hahn S, Leiderman E, Salgunan R, Soghier I, Gulani P, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest events during the covid-19 pandemic: a single-center experience from a New York City Public Hospital. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13(11):e007303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shao F, Xu S, Ma X, Xu Z, Lyu J, Ng M, Cui H, Yu C, Zhang Q, Sun P, et al. In-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan. China Resuscitation. 2020;151:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Latest Situation of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Hong Kong https://chp-dashboard.geodata.gov.hk/covid-19/en.html.

  6. 6.

    Yap HY, Li TS, Tan KS, Cheung YS, Chui PT, Lam PK, Lam DW, Tong YF, Chu MC, Leung PN, et al. Characteristics, management process, and outcome of patients suffering in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests in a teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(4):258–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the healthcare workers who provided resuscitation to patients with cardiac arrest.

Funding

This was not a funded study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SKT, FHYY and KLL collected the data. LL designed the study and analyzed the data with SKT. LL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GMJ and all other authors helped revise the manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interests. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lowell Ling.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2021.212).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tong, S.K., Ling, L., Zhang, J.Z. et al. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac arrest resuscitation practices and outcomes in non-COVID-19 patients. j intensive care 9, 55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-021-00570-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • 2019 Novel Coronavirus disease
  • Pandemic
  • Outcome
  • Indicator
  • Return of spontaneous circulation
  • Team
  • Resuscitation team
  • Cardiac arrest