Open Access

Perfusion indices revisited

Journal of Intensive Care20175:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0220-5

Received: 25 November 2016

Accepted: 7 March 2017

Published: 14 March 2017

Abstract

Monitoring of tissue perfusion is an essential step in the management of acute circulatory failure. The presence of cellular dysfunction has been a basic component of shock definition even in the absence of hypotension. Monitoring of tissue perfusion includes biomarkers of global tissue perfusion and measures for assessment of perfusion in non-vital organs.

The presence of poor tissue perfusion in a shocked patient is usually associated with worse outcome. Persistently impaired perfusion despite adequate resuscitation is also associated with worse outcome. Thus, normalization of some perfusion indices has become one of the resuscitation targets in patients with septic shock.

Although the collective evidence shows the clear relation between impaired peripheral perfusion and mortality, the use of different perfusion indices as a resuscitation target needs more research.

Keywords

Perfusion indices Lactate Shock

Background

Monitoring of tissue perfusion is an essential step in the management of acute circulatory failure. The presence of cellular dysfunction has been a basic component of shock definition even in the absence of hypotension [1]. The ideal parameter for tissue perfusion should be rapid, non-invasive, and easily measured without the need of advanced skills. Evaluation of tissue perfusion includes clinical evaluation as well as biomarkers. Popular biomarkers of tissue perfusion such as serum lactate and central venous oxygen saturation are indicators of global tissue perfusion. Monitoring of peripheral circulation especially in non-vital organs added new insights for monitoring of tissue perfusion. Peripheral non-vital organ perfusion deteriorates earlier and improves later than vital organs. Assessment of peripheral circulation has become easier after introduction of new non-invasive devices as well as clinical scoring systems.

In this article, we provide a comprehensive updated review for all the available indices for monitoring of tissue perfusion. The advantages and disadvantages of each method will be mentioned. Thoughts for future research and gaps in literature will also be highlighted (Table 1).
Table 1

Perfusion indices: evidence and disadvantages

Measure

Evidence

Disadvantages

Lactate

Meta-analysis

Needs blood sampling

Laboratory time

Could be elevated in other conditions than shock

ScvO2

RCT

Needs central catheter

Less useful under anesthesia

P (v-a) CO2

Cohort

Needs central catheter

Needs blood sampling

Laboratory time

Temperature gradients

Cohort

T c-toe is affected by hypothermia and room temperature

LV strain

Cohort

Needs expert operator

Skin mottling

Cohort

Limited value in burns, amputations, and in dark skin

Capillary refill time

Cohort

Index CRT: inter-rater variability

Knee CRT: limited value in dark skin

PPI

Cohort

Needs an expensive device and electrodes

StO2

Cohort

Needs NRIS and electrodes

Less accurate in septic shock

Less accurate in early shock stages

Ptco2

Cohort

Needs special monitor and electrodes

No definitive cutoff value

OCT

RCT

Needs special monitor and electrodes

Restricted to intubated patients

Sublingual microcirculation

Cohort

Needs special device

CRT capillary refill time, LV left ventricular, NRIS near-infrared spectroscopy, OCT oxygen challenge test, Ptco 2 subcutaneous partial oxygen pressure, PPI peripheral perfusion index, P (v-a) CO 2 central-venous-arterial oxygen gradient, RCT randomized controlled trial, ScvO 2 central venous oxygen saturation, StO 2 tissue oxygen saturation, T c-toe central-to-toe temperature gradient, T skin-diff temperature gradient between fingertip and forearm

Cardiac output as a determinant of tissue perfusion

The balance between oxygen delivery (DO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) considered the mainstay of understanding the concept of tissue perfusion and the development of organ dysfunction. In a steady state, the VO2 constitutes only 25% of DO2. In a shock state, the VO2 increased out of proportion of DO2 to the point that DO2 falls below a critical threshold where the VO2 is dependent on DO2. Below that point, organ perfusion will be critically impaired and transition to anerobic metabolism will occur [2].

Because the main determinant of DO2 is the cardiac output (CO), most patients’ evaluation and resuscitation strategies depend on evaluating and optimizing this parameter. Assessing CO is performed by invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive methods [3]. More recently, surviving sepsis campaign recommended the routine use of echocardiography during initial assessment of patients with septic shock [4].

Markers of global perfusion

Lactate

Background

Lactate is the end product of anerobic glycolysis [5]. Serum lactate level increases in states of cellular hypoxia or low peripheral perfusion; thus, serum lactate level is considered a surrogate of cellular perfusion [5].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

Lactate is the most frequently used marker of tissue perfusion [6]. Lactic acidosis is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in septic shock [7, 8]. Increased lactate clearance during resuscitation of septic shock was associated with improved outcomes [9].

Usefulness in other settings

Lactic acidosis is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in trauma [10] and cardiac arrest [11].

Degree of invasiveness

It is minimally invasive but needs available blood gas analysis.

Mixed and central venous oxygen saturation

Background

Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) is an indicator for adequate oxygen delivery (DO2) [1]; thus, the change in SvO2 reflects the change in cardiac output as long as other determinants of DO2 are stable [1]. In healthy individuals, SvO2 value is 75% while in critically ill patients, its value is 70% [1]. Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is another indicator for oxygen delivery; however, the evidence on the correlation between ScvO2 and SvO2 is not clear [12, 13]. ScvO2 reflects perfusion status in the upper body and is not affected by blood coming from the lower body nor coronary sinus [14]. In healthy individuals, ScvO2 is lower than SvO2 [15]; however, in shocked patients, ScvO2 may exceed SvO2 by up to 20% due to redistribution of blood to the upper body [16, 17].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

Although ScvO2 and SvO2 are not interchangeable, ScvO2 is still useful as a predictor of outcome in septic shock. Persistently low ScvO2 during resuscitation is associated with poor outcomes in septic shock patients [18, 19]. Despite its clinical value, maintenance of ScvO2 is no longer a resuscitation goal in the new surviving sepsis campaign guidelines [4].

Usefulness in other settings

Despite the limited value of ScvO2 under general anesthesia, it was reported as a valuable measure in cardiac surgery patients where lower ScvO2 values were associated with more complications [20]; moreover, in a randomized controlled trial, maintenance of ScvO2 of at least 70% was associated with lower complications in cardiac surgery patients [21].

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

In addition to the need to central venous catheter, ScvO2 is usually less informative under general anesthesia because the use of neuromuscular blockers decreases oxygen consumption; moreover, the use of high fraction of inspired oxygen usually (FiO2) corrects hypoxemia and increases DO2 [22].

CO2 gap (P (v-a) CO2)

Background

The difference between PCO2 in central venous blood and PCO2 in arterial blood is known as central-venous-arterial CO2 gap (P (v-a) CO2). P (v-a) CO2 has been considered as an indicator of the adequacy of venous blood flow to wash out CO2 in peripheral tissues [23]. Elevated P (v-a) CO2 (above 6 mmHg) occurs in cases of decreased systemic blood flow. Normalization of P (v-a) CO2 during resuscitation was associated with normalization of serum lactate [24].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

P (v-a) CO2 is negatively correlated with cardiac output in septic shock patients [25]; thus, P (v-a) CO2 is a useful parameter to assess the adequacy of tissue perfusion during resuscitation of patients in septic shock [24]. Persistence of high P (v-a) CO2 during early resuscitation of septic shock is associated with poor outcomes [26].

In cases with decreased ScvO2, a high P (v-a) CO2 denotes that tissue hypoperfusion is due to inadequate cardiac output, whereas normal P (v-a) CO2 denotes that improving cardiac output is unlikely to improve the oxygen delivery to the tissues [23]. In cases of normal ScvO2 and P (v-a) CO2 with evidence of anerobic metabolism (i.e., elevated serum lactate), manipulation of macrocirculation would be not effective to improve the condition because this denotes mitochondrial or microcirculatory disturbances [23].

Usefulness in other settings

In addition to its value in septic shock patients, P (v-a) CO2 is also negatively correlated with cardiac output in cardiogenic shock patients [27] and patients with severe isovolemic anemia [28].

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

Assessment of P (v-a) CO2 needs the presence of both arterial and central venous lines.

Left ventricular strain

Background

Left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVS) is defined as “the percentage distance shortening of the endocardium along its length” [29]. The traditional parameter for assessment of left ventricular function is ejection fraction; however, this parameter could be confounded by cardiac preload and heart rate; moreover, it is highly operator dependent; thus, LVS appears as a novel method for evaluation of systolic function that could help in early detection of myocardial ischemia [30].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

In a prospective observational study [31], the ability of LVS as a measure for oxygen delivery was evaluated. LVS was associated with elevated serum lactate and low ScvO2 in patients with septic shock. The findings of the aforementioned study suggest that LVS could be a non-invasive surrogate for assessment of tissue perfusion.

Usefulness in other settings

There is no available evidence.

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

This parameter is limited by the need of an expert echocardiography operator [31]. A summary for global and local indices is provided in Table 1.

Markers of local perfusion

Temperature values and gradients

Background

Skin temperature is a traditional sign of peripheral vasoconstriction. Critically ill patients with cold skin temperature have lower cardiac index, lower Svo2, and higher serum lactate compared to patients with warm skin temperature [32]. Temperature gradients are better subjective methods for assessment of peripheral perfusion [33, 34].

Central-to-toe temperature (T c-toe) is the difference between central temperature measured at the tympanic membrane and temperature at the ventral surface of the big toe measured by a skin probe. T c-toe gradient has been used as a measure of peripheral vasoconstriction; however, it has the disadvantage of being affected hypothermia as well as room temperature [34].

The temperature gradient between fingertip and forearm (T skin-diff) has also been reported as a marker of peripheral vasoconstriction. T skin-diff is the difference between the temperatures at the index and at the radial side of the forearm measured using two skin probes. T skin-diff has the advantage of not being affected by the ambient temperature because the change in ambient temperature affects both fingertip and forearm equally [34, 35].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

T c-toe more than 7 °C and T skin-diff more than 0 °C are indicators for vasoconstriction [34]. T skin-diff more than 2 and 4 °C indicates the presence of intermediate and severe vasoconstriction respectively [35]. There is an association between T skin-diff and poor outcomes in abdominal surgery patients [35] and in patients with acute circulatory failure.

Usefulness in other settings

The persistence of peripheral perfusion alterations after reversal of therapeutic hypothermia are associated with poor outcomes in cases of out-of-hospital arrest [36]. In cardiac surgery patients, the transition from peripheral vasoconstriction to vasodilatation (measured by skin surface gradient) is associated with shorter time to extubation after both normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass [37].

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

It is a non-invasive parameter. T c-toe is affected by hypothermia and room temperature.

Skin mottling

Background

Skin mottling is defined as “patchy skin discoloration.” Skin mottling usually manifests around the knees and might extend to other sites of peripheral circulation such as fingers and ears [33]. Skin mottling is a result of heterogeneous small vessel vasoconstriction [38]. Skin mottling is an easily assessed sign of peripheral hypoperfusion [38].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

A six-grade scoring system (ranging from 0 to 5) has been introduced by Ait-Oufella and colleagues depending on the extent of skin mottling around the knee [39]. Skin mottling score (SMS) ranges from 0: no mottling, 1: a coin sized mottling area at the knee center, 2: a mottling area that does not extend above the upper margin of knee cap, 3: a mottling area localized to the lower thigh, 4: a mottling area reaching the upper thigh below the groin fold, to 5: extensive mottling reaching above the groin fold [39]. SMS could be subjective estimate of the severity of peripheral hypoperfusion [39]. Higher SMS (scoring 4 to 5) was associated with poor patient outcome in general ICU population [40] and in patients with septic shock [41]. A good correlation was reported between changes in both mottling score and skin perfusion (assessed by laser Doppler) during resuscitation of septic shock patients [42]. Prolonged skin mottling more than 6 h was associated with ICU mortality independently from severity scoring systems [40].

Usefulness in other settings

There is no available evidence.

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

It is a non-invasive parameter. It has a limited value in burns, amputations, and in dark skin.

Capillary refill time (CRT)

Background

CRT is defined as “the time needed for skin’s color to return to baseline on a finger’s tip after application of blanching pressure” [33]. CRT can be clinically measured over the fingertip [35, 43] or over the knee area [43]. CRT is a measure of peripheral capillary blood flow [33].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

CRT showed a good correlation with urinary output and serum lactate levels [43]. Prolonged CRT has been associated with poor outcomes in septic shock patients [43] and in non-selected critically ill patients [34] with a cutoff value that ranged between 2.5 and 5 s. Normalization of CRT was associated with improved survival rate in septic shock patients [44].

Usefulness in other settings

Prolonged CRT has also been associated with poor outcomes in patients following abdominal surgery [35].

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

It is a non-invasive parameter. Index CRT has the disadvantage of inter-rater variability. Knee CRT has a limited value in dark skin.

Peripheral perfusion index (PPI)

Background

PPI represents “the ratio between the pulsatile and non-pulsatile component of the light reaching the pulse oximeter” [45]. As the pulsatile (arterial) flow is the only portion affected with vasoconstriction and vasodilatation, PPI has been considered as a numerical non-invasive measure for peripheral perfusion. PPI decreases in states of hypoperfusion due to decreased pulsatile component with a constant non-pulsatile component of blood flow [45].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

The change in PPI reflects the change in other measures of hypoperfusion such as temperature gradients [45], lactate, and P (v-a) CO2 [46]. In critically ill patients, PPI less than 1.4 is a marker of hypoperfusion [45]; also, PPI less than 0.6 is an independent factor for 30-day mortality [46]. In septic shock patients, PPI less than 0.3 predicted vasopressor therapy [47] and below 0.2 predicted mortality [48].

Usefulness in other settings

Persistent decrease in PPI is associated with poor outcome after therapeutic hypothermia for out-of-hospital arrest [36] and in major abdominal surgery patients [35].

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

PPI is a non-invasive measure; however, it needs a special pulse oximeter. PPI is characterized by high skewness [45] and high inter-individual variability [49]; thus, it is more useful in trend monitoring for follow-up rather than being used as a single measure [49].

Tissue oxygen saturation (StO2)

Background

StO2 is measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) [6]. Measurement by StO2 is based on the difference in light absorption between oxy- and deoxyhemoglobins [50]. StO2 represents the hemoglobin oxygen saturation in the tissues [6]. The normal value for StO2 is 87% which represents the sum of arterial, venous, and capillary blood oxygen saturation [51]. The most common sites for measurement of StO2 are thenar and frontal. StO2 decreases in states of hypoperfusion and hypoxia [50].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

Thenar StO2 decreases in situations of hypoperfusion according to shock severity [51, 52]. In trauma patients, thenar StO2 could discriminate patients in severe shock [51]. Low thenar StO2 during initial resuscitation of multiple trauma patients correlate with future development of multiple organ dysfunction [53].

Usefulness in other settings

StO2 could predict the need of blood transfusion in trauma patients [54]. In cardiac surgery, cerebral oxygenation below 50% predicted poor postoperative cognitive dysfunction [55]; moreover, cerebral oxygenation showed good correlation with jugular venous saturation [56].

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

StO2 is a non-invasive parameter; however, it has some limitations: firstly, StO2 showed high variability among healthy volunteers, patients with mild and moderate shock; thus, its value is restricted to patients with severe shock [51]; secondly, this high variability makes StO2 a useful parameter for trend monitoring rather than a single measure value [49]. Thirdly, StO2 is of low value in patients with septic shock [6, 57].

Continuous transcutaneous oxygen measurement

Background

Subcutaneous partial oxygen pressure (Ptco2) was previously measured using invasive subcutaneous probes [58]; however, newer technology facilitated Ptco2 measurement using non-invasive transcutaneous probes [59, 60]. Ptco2 has been more popular in neonates than adults [61]. The limited use of Ptco2 in adults is because of the lack of agreement between its value and arterial oxygen tension due to the thicker epidermis in adults compared to neonates [61].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

Despite its low accuracy in adults, Ptco2 has been reported as a useful predictor for outcomes in critically ill emergency patients [59, 60]. A newer parameter, the oxygen challenge test (OCT), was reported as a tool for early diagnosis of poor peripheral perfusion [48, 62, 63]. OCT the Ptco2 response to increasing Fio2 to 1 for a 5-min duration. The Ptco2 increased with increasing FiO2 in non-shocked patients, whereas Ptco2 poorly responded to increasing FiO2 in shocked patients. An increase of 21 mmHg in Ptco2 after OCT was associated with better patient outcome [62]. Poor response to OCT was a predictor of mortality when reported before [62, 63] or after [48] resuscitation. In a randomized controlled trial, Hu et al. [64] investigated the use of OCT as a resuscitation target in patients with severe sepsis; they reported that a response of 25 mmHg or more to OCT would improve the patient outcome.

Usefulness in other settings

There is no available evidence.

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

Although it is a non-invasive measure, Ptco2 has some limitations. Ptco2 needs special monitor and electrodes. Moreover, there is no definitive cutoff value. The value of OCT is restricted to intubated patients only.

Sublingual microcirculation

Background

Visualization of sublingual microcirculation using handheld microscopes has recently gained widespread attention. Direct visualization of microcirculation focuses on vascular density, flow, and proportion of perfused vessels [65]. Assessment of microcirculation has been a research tool not applicable in the clinical bedside assessment. With the introduction of more advanced microscopes (CytoCam), bedside real-time assessment of microcirculation has been available with adequate agreement with the conventional image analysis [66].

In a cross-sectional multicenter observational study, Lima et al. [67] investigated the inter-rater reliability for 45 physicians and 16 nurses in subjective assessment of sublingual microcirculation; participants were asked to categorize the videos into good, bad, and very bad microcirculation. Results of the aforementioned study showed good agreement between the participant assessment and the conventional analysis [67]. A recent protocol for real-time assessment of microcirculation was recently introduced by Naumann et al. [68]. Point of care microcirculation (POEM) is a 5-point scoring system that could be used for assessment of flow and heterogeneity with accepted inter-rater agreement [68].

Selectivity and sensitivity in clinical settings

It is still under research.

Usefulness in other settings

There is no available evidence.

Limitations and degree of invasiveness

Assessment of sublingual microcirculation is a non-invasive procedure. However, it has the disadvantage of the need of an expensive device.

Perfusion-guided resuscitation

Although normalization of central indices of tissue perfusion (such as lactate and ScvO2) has been an essential target of resuscitation of patients with septic shock [69], studies validating the value of targeting an improved peripheral perfusion markers are sparse. In an observational study, Hernandez and colleagues reported that early recovery of peripheral perfusion indices (such CRT, T c-toe, and P (v-a) CO2) is a marker of successful resuscitation of septic shock patients. In an animal study, Van Genderen et al. [70] reported a relationship between central and peripheral markers of perfusion during resuscitation of experimental shock; however, the rate of normalization of perfusion markers was dependent on the underlying type of shock. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the perfusion-based approach during resuscitation of 30 septic shock patients was conducted by the same group of authors [71]. The aforementioned study reported that the perfusion-based approach resulted in lower fluid replacement, less organ dysfunction, and shorter length of stay [71]. Larger RCTs are recommended to validate the perfusion-based approach and to set more clear steps of resuscitation.

Conclusions

Monitoring of tissue perfusion includes biomarkers of global tissue perfusion, measures for assessment of perfusion in non-vital organs, and direct visualization of sublingual microcirculation.

Three main clinical implications for perfusion indices were reported. First, the presence of poor tissue perfusion in a shocked patient is usually associated with worse outcome. Second, persistently impaired perfusion despite adequate resuscitation is associated with worse outcome. Third, normalization of some perfusion indices (lactate and central venous oxygen saturation) has become one of the resuscitation targets in patients with septic shock.

Direct visualization of sublingual circulation represents a promising tool for evaluation of peripheral perfusion. Simple and user-friendly protocols are being introduced to facilitate the use of sublingual circulation as a bedside tool for assessment of shocked patients.

Although the collective evidence shows the clear relation between impaired peripheral perfusion and mortality, the use of different perfusion indices as a resuscitation target was not adequately investigated. Most of the data concerning the perfusion indices are extracted from observational trials with a few number of randomized controlled trials.

Abbreviations

CRT: 

Capillary refill time

DO2

Oxygen delivery

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

LVS: 

Left ventricular strain

NIRS: 

Near-infrared spectroscopy

OCT: 

Oxygen challenge test

P (v-a) CO2

Central-venous-arterial CO2 gap

POEM: 

Point of care microcirculation

PPI: 

Peripheral perfusion index

Ptco2

Subcutaneous partial oxygen pressure

RCT: 

Randomized controlled trial

ScvO2

Central venous oxygen saturation

SMS: 

Skin mottling score

StO2

Tissue oxygen saturation

SvO2

Mixed venous oxygen saturation

T c-toe

Central-to-toe temperature

T skin-diff

The temperature gradient between fingertip and forearm

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Ahmed Shash professor and head of Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University for his continuous support.

Funding

This work was funded by Cairo University.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

AH was responsible for writing the manuscript and collection of the data. AM was responsible for conception of the topic and revision of the manuscript. HN helped in writing and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University
(2)
Critical Care Department, El-Ameen Hospital

References

  1. Vincent J-L, Pelosi P, Pearse R, Payen D, Perel A, Hoeft A, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):224.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Lighthall GK, Singh S. Perioperative maintenance of tissue perfusion and cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;18(2):117–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jozwiak M, Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Monitoring: from cardiac output monitoring to echocardiography. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(5):395–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fuller BM, Dellinger RP. Lactate as a hemodynamic marker in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18(3):267–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mayer K, Trzeciak S, Puri NK. Assessment of the adequacy of oxygen delivery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22:437–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mikkelsen ME, Miltiades AN, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, Fuchs BD, Shah CV, et al. Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1670–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Chansky ME, Arnold RC, Schorr C, Milcarek B, et al. Serum lactate as a predictor of mortality in patients with infection. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(6):970–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, Ressler JA, et al. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(8):1637–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Abramson D, Scalea TM, Hitchcock R, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, Greenspan J. Lactate clearance and survival following injury. J Trauma. 1993;35(4):584–8. discussion 588–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kliegel A, Losert H, Sterz F, Holzer M, Zeiner A, Havel C, et al. Serial lactate determinations for prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest. Medicine (Baltimore). 2004;83(5):274–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chawla LS, Zia H, Gutierrez G, Katz NM, Seneff MG, Shah M. Lack of equivalence between central and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Chest. 2004;126(6):1891–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dueck MH, Klimek M, Appenrodt S, Weigand C, Boerner U. Trends but not individual values of central venous oxygen saturation agree with mixed venous oxygen saturation during varying hemodynamic conditions. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):249–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Glamann DB, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Incidence and significance of a "step-down" in oxygen saturation from superior vena cava to pulmonary artery. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(6):695–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. BARRATT-BOYES BG, WOOD EH. The oxygen saturation of blood in the venae cavae, right-heart chambers, and pulmonary vessels of healthy subjects. J Lab Clin Med. 1957;50(1):93–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee J, Wright F, Barber R, Stanley L. Central venous oxygen saturation in shock: a study in man. Anesthesiology. 1972;36(5):472–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reinhart K, Rudolph T, Bredle DL, Hannemann L, Cain SM. Comparison of central-venous to mixed-venous oxygen saturation during changes in oxygen supply/demand. Chest. 1989;95(6):1216–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pope JV, Jones AE, Gaieski DF, Arnold RC, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, et al. Multicenter study of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2)) as a predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(1):40–6. e1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Boulain T, Garot D, Vignon P, Lascarrou J-B, Desachy A, Botoc V, et al. Prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):609.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Collaborative Study Group on Perioperative ScvO2 Monitoring. Multicentre study on peri- and postoperative central venous oxygen saturation in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R158.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Pölönen P, Ruokonen E, Hippeläinen M, Pöyhönen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(5):1052–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Van der Linden P, Schmartz D, Gilbart E, Engelman E, Vincent JL. Effects of propofol, etomidate, and pentobarbital on critical oxygen delivery. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(7):2492–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mallat J, Lemyze M, Tronchon L, Vallet B, Thevenin D. Use of venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference to guide resuscitation therapy in septic shock. World J Crit care Med. 2016;5(1):47–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Mallat J, Pepy F, Lemyze M, Gasan G, Vangrunderbeeck N, Tronchon L, et al. Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference in early resuscitation from septic shock: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31(7):371–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bakker J, Vincent JL, Gris P, Leon M, Coffernils M, Kahn RJ. Veno-arterial carbon dioxide gradient in human septic shock. Chest. 1992;101(2):509–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ospina-Tascón GA, Bautista-Rincón DF, Umaña M, Tafur JD, Gutiérrez A, García AF, et al. Persistently high venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide differences during early resuscitation are associated with poor outcomes in septic shock. Crit Care. 2013;17(6):R294.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Teboul JL, Mercat A, Lenique F, Berton C. Value of the venous-arterial PCO2 gradient to reflect the oxygen supply to demand in humans: effects of dobutamine. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(6):1007–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kocsi S, Demeter G, Érces D, Kaszaki J, Molnár Z. Central venous-to-arterial CO2-gap may increase in severe isovolemic anemia. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105148.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Voigt J-U, Exner B, Schmiedehausen K, Huchzermeyer C, Reulbach U, Nixdorff U, et al. Strain-rate imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography provides objective evidence of inducible ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107(16):2120–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoit BD. Strain and strain rate echocardiography and coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(2):179–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lanspa MJ, Pittman JE, Hirshberg EL, Wilson EL, Olsen T, Brown SM, et al. Association of left ventricular longitudinal strain with central venous oxygen saturation and serum lactate in patients with early severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care. 2015;19:304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan LJ, McPartland K, Santora TA, Trooskin SZ. Start with a subjective assessment of skin temperature to identify hypoperfusion in intensive care unit patients. J Trauma. 2001;50(4):620–7. discussion 627–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ait-Oufella H, Bakker J. Understanding clinical signs of poor tissue perfusion during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):2070-2072.Google Scholar
  34. Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Ince C, Bakker J. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):934–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. van Genderen ME, Paauwe J, de Jonge J, van der Valk RJP, Lima A, Bakker J, et al. Clinical assessment of peripheral perfusion to predict postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery early: a prospective observational study in adults. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):R114.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. van Genderen ME, Lima A, Akkerhuis M, Bakker J, van Bommel J. Persistent peripheral and microcirculatory perfusion alterations after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are associated with poor survival. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2287–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pezawas T, Rajek A, Plöchl W. Core and skin surface temperature course after normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and its impact on extubation time. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24(1):20–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lima A, Takala J. Clinical significance of monitoring perfusion in non-vital organs. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(7):1052–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, Galbois A, Baudel JL, Lemant J, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(5):801–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Coudroy R, Jamet A, Frat JP, Veinstein A, Chatellier D, Goudet V, et al. Incidence and impact of skin mottling over the knee and its duration on outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(3):452–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. de Moura EB, Amorim FF, da Cruz Santana AN, Kanhouche G, de Souza Godoy LG, de Jesus AL, et al. Skin mottling score as a predictor of 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(3):479–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ait-Oufella H, Bourcier S, Alves M, Galbois A, Baudel J-L, Margetis D, et al. Alteration of skin perfusion in mottling area during septic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, Pichereau C, Alves M, Bertinchamp R, et al. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(7):958–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hernandez G, Luengo C, Bruhn A, Kattan E, Friedman G, Ospina-Tascon G, et al. When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring. Ann Intensive Care. 2014;4:30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Lima AP, Beelen P, Bakker J. Use of a peripheral perfusion index derived from the pulse oximetry signal as a noninvasive indicator of perfusion. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(6):1210–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. He H, Long Y, Liu D, Wang X, Zhou X. Clinical classification of tissue perfusion based on the central venous oxygen saturation and the peripheral perfusion index. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):330.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Rasmy I, Mohamed H, Nabil N, Abdalah S, Hasanin A, Eladawy A, et al. Evaluation of perfusion index as a predictor of vasopressor requirement in patients with severe sepsis. Shock. 2015;44(6):554–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. He HW, Liu DW, Long Y, Wang XT. The peripheral perfusion index and transcutaneous oxygen challenge test are predictive of mortality in septic patients after resuscitation. Crit Care. 2013;17(3):R116.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Høiseth LØ, Hisdal J, Hoff IE, Hagen OA, Landsverk SA, Kirkebøen KA. Tissue oxygen saturation and finger perfusion index in central hypovolemia: influence of pain. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):747–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Landesberg G, Shamir M, Avidan A. Early noninvasive detection of hypovolemia in trauma patients—are we there Yet?*. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):907–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Crookes BA, Cohn SM, Bloch S, Amortegui J, Manning R, Li P, et al. Can near-infrared spectroscopy identify the severity of shock in trauma patients? J Trauma. 2005;58(4):806–13. discussion 813–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mancini DM, Bolinger L, Li H, Kendrick K, Chance B, Wilson JR. Validation of near-infrared spectroscopy in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1994;77(6):2740–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nicks BA, Campons KM, Bozeman WP. Association of low non-invasive near-infrared spectroscopic measurements during initial trauma resuscitation with future development of multiple organ dysfunction. World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(2):105–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith J, Bricker S, Putnam B. Tissue oxygen saturation predicts the need for early blood transfusion in trauma patients. Am Surg. 2008;74(10):1006–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Slater JP, Guarino T, Stack J, Vinod K, Bustami RT, Brown 3rd JM, Rodriguez AL, Magovern CJ, Zaubler T, Freundlich KPG. Cerebral oxygen desaturation predicts cognitive decline and longer hospital stay after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(1):36–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Daubeney PE, Pilkington SN, Janke E, Charlton GA, Smith DCWS. Cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy: comparison with jugular bulb oximetry. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(3):930–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Macdonald SPJ, Brown SGA. Near-infrared spectroscopy in the assessment of suspected sepsis in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2015;32(5):404–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Waxman K, Annas C, Daughters K, Tominaga GT, Scannell G. A method to determine the adequacy of resuscitation using tissue oxygen monitoring. J Trauma. 1994;36(6):852–6. discussion 856–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Chan L, Ramicone E, Kamel ES, Velmahos GC, et al. Outcome prediction of emergency patients by noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. Chest. 2001;120(2):528–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tatevossian RG, Wo CC, Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Shoemaker WC. Transcutaneous oxygen and CO2 as early warning of tissue hypoxia and hemodynamic shock in critically ill emergency patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(7):2248–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Huch R, Huch A, Lübbers DW. Transcutaneous measurement of blood Po2 (tcPo2)—method and application in perinatal medicine. J Perinat Med. 1973;1(3):183–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu M, Morita SY, Daniel SR, Chapital A, Waxman K, Severino R. Transcutaneous pressure of oxygen: a noninvasive and early detector of peripheral shock and outcome. Shock. 2006;26(5):450–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. He H-W, Liu D-W, Long Y, Wang X-T, Chai W-Z, Zhou X. The transcutaneous oxygen challenge test: a noninvasive method for detecting low cardiac output in septic patients. Shock. 2012;37(2):152–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu M, Chapital A, Ho HC, Wang J, Takanishi D. A prospective randomized trial comparing oxygen delivery versus transcutaneous pressure of oxygen values as resuscitative goals. Shock. 2007;27(6):615–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lima A. Current status of tissue monitoring in the management of shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22(3):274–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Tanaka S, Harrois A, Nicolaï C, Flores M, Hamada S, Vicaut E, et al. Qualitative real-time analysis by nurses of sublingual microcirculation in intensive care unit: the MICRONURSE study. Crit Care. 2015;19:388.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Lima A, López A, van Genderen ME, Hurtado FJ, Angulo M, Grignola JC, et al. Interrater reliability and diagnostic performance of subjective evaluation of sublingual microcirculation images by physicians and nurses: a multicenter observational study. Shock. 2015;44(3):239–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Naumann DN, Mellis C, Husheer SLG, Hopkins P, Bishop J, Midwinter MJ, et al. Real-time point of care microcirculatory assessment of shock: design, rationale and application of the point of care microcirculation (POEM) tool. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):310.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. van Genderen ME, Klijn E, Lima A, de Jonge J, Sleeswijk Visser S, Voorbeijtel J, et al. Microvascular perfusion as a target for fluid resuscitation in experimental circulatory shock. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(2):e96–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Pe M, Goad A, Thompson C, Taylor K, Harry B, Passmore L, et al. Early peripheral perfusion–guided fluid therapy in patients with septic Shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(4):477–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017