Skip to main content

From bedside to recovery: exercise therapy for prevention of post-intensive care syndrome

Abstract

Background

As advancements in critical care medicine continue to improve Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survival rates, clinical and research attention is urgently shifting toward improving the quality of survival. Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) is a complex constellation of physical, cognitive, and mental dysfunctions that severely impact patients’ lives after hospital discharge. This review provides a comprehensive and multi-dimensional summary of the current evidence and practice of exercise therapy (ET) during and after an ICU admission to prevent and manage the various domains of PICS. The review aims to elucidate the evidence of the mechanisms and effects of ET in ICU rehabilitation and highlight that suboptimal clinical and functional outcomes of ICU patients is a growing public health concern that needs to be urgently addressed.

Main body

This review commences with a brief overview of the current relationship between PICS and ET, describing the latest research on this topic. It subsequently summarises the use of ET in ICU, hospital wards, and post-hospital discharge, illuminating the problematic transition between these settings. The following chapters focus on the effects of ET on physical, cognitive, and mental function, detailing the multi-faceted biological and pathophysiological mechanisms of dysfunctions and the benefits of ET in all three domains. This is followed by a chapter focusing on co-interventions and how to maximise and enhance the effect of ET, outlining practical strategies for how to optimise the effectiveness of ET. The review next describes several emerging technologies that have been introduced/suggested to augment and support the provision of ET during and after ICU admission. Lastly, the review discusses future research directions.

Conclusion

PICS is a growing global healthcare concern. This review aims to guide clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and healthcare providers in utilising ET as a therapeutic and preventive measure for patients during and after an ICU admission to address this problem. An improved understanding of the effectiveness of ET and the clinical and research gaps that needs to be urgently addressed will greatly assist clinicians in their efforts to rehabilitate ICU survivors, improving patients’ quality of survival and helping them return to their normal lives after hospital discharge.

Introduction

Survival following a stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is an easily quantifiable measure of success; however, the subsequent negative impact that critical illness and ICU admission induces on survivors’ quality of life (QOL) should be seen as a medical emergency [1]. Studies have shown that 50–80% of ICU survivors experience a myriad of disabilities, extending long beyond their hospital discharge [2, 3]. Many of these problems are diagnosed years after ICU discharge or not at all. Patients and their families commonly struggle to cope with ongoing disabilities and associated impacts on their personal finances and relationships without receiving any support or timely intervention. Overall, awareness of these problems is still limited, amongst healthcare providers as well as in society, impeding effective management.

The term Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) was introduced in 2012 [3]. This is an umbrella term comprising physical, cognitive, and mental dysfunctions, reduced QOL, impaired activity of daily living (ADL), chronic pain, and various other symptoms commonly experienced after an ICU admission [1,2,3]. It is essential that all staff working in ICU, hospital wards, or community settings are aware of this ‘syndrome’ to provide appropriate support/interventions in a timely manner [4].

With increasing recognition of the pervasive nature of PICS, research and clinical focus have shifted from reactive provision of intervention after diagnosis, to proactively focusing on prevention. There are multiple complex factors contributing to the development of PICS. Prolonged immobilisation and the subsequent skeletal muscle deconditioning frequently observed in ICU patients is a major contributing factor, which severely impacts on physical function, cognition and mental health [5, 6]. This has led to the hypothesis that early exercise therapy (ET) and rehabilitation might offer protective benefits against these disabilities.

There are many terms used to describe exercise or rehabilitation interventions in the ICU setting. Rehabilitation is defined by the World Health Organization as “a set of interventions designed to optimise functioning and reduce disability in individuals with health conditions in interaction with their environment”. This includes physical exercise training but also covers other associated interventions (e.g. speech and language training, education, and psychological therapies and interventions). This review focuses specifically on physical ET.

ET encompasses a range of interventions designed to maintain and restore functional ability, prevent disability, and promote physical health. For this review, ET is defined as any physical activity or intervention that assists patients in maintaining and/or improving muscle strength and physical function. ET for patients in ICU can be passive (e.g. range of motion, tilt table, neuro-muscular electrical stimulation, or upright positioning), assisted (e.g. assisted upper and lower limb exercises), or active (e.g. inspiratory muscle training, sitting, standing, marching on the spot, functional activities, cycle ergometry, or mobilisation/walking) [7,8,9,10,11,12].

The potential of ET is not limited to counteracting the physiological consequences of critical illness on physical function and recovery, but also has positive effects on cognitive and mental function [13]. In this paper we summarise the current evidence supporting ET as a preventative strategy against PICS, elucidate the underlying mechanisms, and outline the challenges of delivery, gaps in current service delivery, and potential future research directions.

Latest research trends

ET has been proven to be safe and feasible during and after an ICU admission [14, 15]. Recent research trends have therefore moved toward exploring the optimal dosing and timing of ET delivery (e.g. intensity, duration, frequency) [7, 16, 17], augmentative/additional interventions (e.g. bundled care, nutrition, environmental optimisation) [18,19,20,21], and technology/tools that can deliver ET in alternative ways or support the delivery of ET to patients currently unable to participate in traditional rehabilitation activities (e.g. virtual reality, robotics) [22, 23]. Effects of ET on short-term outcomes (e.g. mortality, delirium, ICU length of stay, and weaning from mechanical ventilation) and long-term outcomes (e.g. PICS-related outcomes, healthcare resource usage, economic and social impacts) are being examined. Investigating the heterogenous effect of ET among different cohorts of ICU patients is also considered a high priority to optimise the delivered intervention to match patients’ individual backgrounds, presentations, and comorbidities [24, 25]. Recently, an artificial intelligence-based learning approach demonstrated the heterogenous effect of ET in different cohorts of ICU patients, suggesting the importance of an individualised and resource-optimised approach [24]. This approach will be also helpful to address the paradox that increased ET dose in ICU have no effects in the general ICU cohort or may even have deleterious effect [26, 27].

In addition to investigating the homogenous effect of ET, there is currently a growing trend to explore the effects of ET in specific ICU cohorts such as heart failure, stroke, sepsis, trauma, burn, post-cardiovascular surgery, and respiratory failure, as the safety considerations and recommendations for optimal delivery of ET varies significantly between these conditions. This will support the development of disease-specific guidelines to help optimise delivery of ET, ensuring information is available to guide clinicians in delivering ET proactively and safely to all ICU populations, assisting patients in returning to premorbid function and residency regardless of their ICU admission cause or illness severity.

Another important discussion is the environmental and structural changes in ICUs forced by the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic led to a regression of ET culture in ICU, losing progress gained over the past decade. In point prevalence studies, implementation of ET during the pandemic was significantly lower for ICU patients both with and without COVID-19 compared to before the pandemic [28, 29]. It is essential to investigate how implementation of ET in ICU is being restored and what is needed to re-establish or facilitate the ET culture in the post-pandemic era, and ensure plans are in place for maintaining safe ET during future pandemic outbreaks.

Exercise therapy and rehabilitation in ICU and hospital wards

ET is a key component of ICU respiratory and rehabilitation care. As described above, ET in an ICU setting can comprise many different passive and active interventions. Delivering safe and appropriate ET for ICU patients requires a strong multidisciplinary team, with everyone responsible for promoting this intervention. Management and prevention of ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW) via ET is considered a key part of best care [30], and should commence as soon as patients can tolerate it after ICU admission and continue beyond ICU and hospital discharge [19]. However, implementation of early ET remains a challenge in ICU, with reasons including the ICU culture, lack of funding for staff, insufficient training available, and lack of suitable equipment to enable safe delivery [31]. Establishing a culture of ET is important, but this requires appropriate education of all key stakeholders and the development of guiding resources such as procedures or protocols. Care needs to be individualised and based on thorough and holistic assessments. While this responsibility is shared among many different disciplines (including doctors, nurses, and allied health), physiotherapists are primarily responsible for this task in most settings [32].

All ICU patients should be assessed and screened daily for suitability for ET, and this should be proactively discussed among the multidisciplinary team during ward rounds or similar clinical forums. In many ICUs, an individualised mobilisation protocol is initiated after it has been ascertained that mobilisation is beneficial for their outcomes [14, 33]. There are published safety criteria and practical guides available to guide mobilisation decisions for mechanically ventilated ICU patients [34,35,36].

Patients’ ET requirements during and after their ICU admission vary greatly. For instance, patients following severe burns have very different needs to trauma patients or patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for severe cardiac failure. Also, patients commonly present with multiple unique pre-existing comorbidities and complications associated with their critical illness and ICU admission. Therefore, the interventions and follow-up required after leaving ICU can be complex and ET must be personalised. However, the ability of ward staff to provide the same quantity and quality of care depends on many factors, including staffing/resources, available equipment, senior staff availability, and patient:therapist ratios. To support ward staff in managing patients’ complex needs, critical care outreach services have been suggested. Unfortunately, studies have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in patient outcomes. However, it has been suggested that ward staff perceive outreach services to be helpful and that the support provided is beneficial, leading to improved care provision [37].

Information on the ability to deliver ET in ICU versus general wards after ICU discharge is limited. However, anecdotally, there is commonly a reduced ability to provide the same quantity of ET after ICU discharge, except in rehabilitation wards and other speciality wards such as spinal cord units with higher staffing ratios. Similarly, current evidence is insufficient to determine whether increased ET following ICU discharge leads to improved patient outcomes [38, 39]. Further studies are required to determine the short- and long-term effects of ET in hospital post-ICU discharge on outcomes.

Exercise therapy and rehabilitation at post-hospital discharge

The evidence of benefits from continued ET after hospital discharge is conflicting. Despite successfully discharging from hospital, patients frequently encounter persisting physical impairments such as muscular weakness, fatigue, decreased exercise tolerance, breathlessness, impaired pulmonary function, chronic long-term inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism [40, 41]. However, there are limited follow-up services available to address these impairments. Some patients are discharged with self-monitored exercise programs, and some may receive ongoing care at home by visiting community/domiciliary services. Notably, only a small proportion of ICU patients attend formal rehabilitation programs after hospital discharge, with attendance limited by barriers such as financial difficulties, residence outside of the hospital’s catchment area, lack of available travel/transport options, a lack of perceived individual benefits, and an inability to attend due to persistent physical, cognitive and/or psychological impairments [42,43,44]. Therefore, in contrast to consistent, guided ET in hospital, continued rehabilitation beyond hospital admission is often challenging and the responsibility of the patient and their family members.

Currently, outpatient services available for specific patient cohorts can range from one-to-one treatment sessions (in hospital or at home), to larger rehabilitation programs with circuit style training such as pulmonary or cardiac rehabilitation. The World Health Organization (WHO) regards rehabilitation programs as an essential component of integrated health services [45], having consistently demonstrated positive results in several patient domains, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (pulmonary rehabilitation) and coronary heart disease (cardiac rehabilitation) [46, 47].

Despite the success of other rehabilitation services, specific ICU rehabilitation programs or ICU follow-up clinics remain sparse, with many current models failing to consistently demonstrate improved patient outcomes [48, 49]. Whilst there is currently no post-ICU follow-up model of care that guarantees improved patient outcomes [50], promising trends have been demonstrated when grouped by treatment category (e.g. psychological therapy, medical management, or ET) [51]. Programs focusing on psychological or medical management have demonstrated fewer post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in patients across several randomised trials [51]. Furthermore, randomised trials focussing on ET were associated with fewer depressive symptoms and improved mental health in the short term [51]. Whilst results for improving physical function were inconsistent between studies [51], programs with an individualised approach have the potential to provide numerous benefits for patients with PICS, many of which may be vital to overcoming longer-term impairments. Unfortunately, there is a sparsity of research investigating the effectiveness of ET after ICU discharge, as well as insufficient understanding of the biological mechanisms causing or contributing to ongoing physical problems post-ICU discharge and how best to address these [52, 53].

Effect of exercise therapy on physical function

Physical impairment and effect of ET on physical function in ICU is summarised in Table 1. [52,53,54,55,56]. A rapid loss of muscle mass (around 2–4% per day and > 15% in the first week) and function occurs, impacting not only peripheral muscles, but also the respiratory muscles, with studies showing significant diaphragm atrophy and decrease in function (ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD)) after only a few days of muscle unloading via mechanical ventilation (MV) [57, 58]. Decreased diaphragm thickness has been shown to be associated with lower probability of liberation from MV and prolonged ICU admission [59].

Table 1 At a glance summary of physical impairment and effect of exercise therapy in ICU

Peripheral muscles

ICUAW, defined by a Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score < 48, is underpinned by muscle deconditioning, critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP), and critical illness myopathy (CIM) [52, 60]. Immobilisation and muscle disuse/unloading during prolonged ICU stays is one of the principal contributors to increased levels of proteolysis and catabolism, and consequential sarcopenia [61]. However, this does not fully explain the pathogenesis of the heterogenous and poor physical recovery, represented by ongoing and persistent muscle weakness and atrophy, that many patients experience well after their ICU discharge, recalcitrant to interventions.

Possible contributing factors to muscle atrophy and weakness during the acute phase in ICU includes systemic inflammation, extensive proteolysis, satellite cell depletion/dysfunction, and an anabolic–catabolic disbalance, leading to a preferential loss of myosin, sarcomere disorganisation, and altered muscle cell electrical excitability (Fig. 1) [26, 53, 56]. It has been suggested that reasons for sustained and ongoing muscle weakness after ICU discharge includes impaired muscle regeneration (caused by loss of satellite cells), persistent inflammation, ongoing mitochondrial dysfunction, and persistent muscle structure alterations [52, 53, 56]. Therefore, it is not only the quantity of muscle that is lost, but also the biomechanical muscle fibre quality [52].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Factors contributing to muscle atrophy and weakness of a critically illness. MV mechanical ventilation

Evidence on how ET impacts these multifactorial and complex biomechanical and cellular factors is still limited. Loading skeletal muscle fibres promotes myofibrillar protein synthesis that activates the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes [62]. This is a key mediator for anabolic signals in skeletal muscle, which is linked with cellular protein synthesis and protein degradation [63]. Unloading a muscle induces a shift of slow (Type I) to fast-twitch (Type II) fibres, resulting in reduction in ability to resist fatigue. Resistance exercise training can reverse this by remodelling the muscle phenotype, shifting fast-twitch to slow-twitch fibres by increasing the utilisation of the oxidative cycle [64, 65]. Exercise has also been demonstrated to reduce inflammation [66]. Possible mechanisms include the release of interleukin-6 (IL-6) into the circulation leading to subsequent increases in levels of IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonists, reduction in the circulating amount of pro-inflammatory monocytes, and inhibition of monocyte and/or macrophage infiltration, leading to modulation of the immune response in the body [67].

Inspiratory muscles

Diaphragmatic function is influenced by the relationship between cytosolic-free calcium, cross-bridge cycling rate, and sarcomere length [68]. Unloading and inactivity of the diaphragm (from MV) induces oxidative modification of the contractile proteins in the muscle, leading to depressed fibre sensitivity to calcium and protease (an enzyme that break down proteins) activation, subsequently resulting in proteolysis, sarcomere disruption, and loss of myosin heavy chain protein and thereby loss of muscle mass and decreased contractile function [69]. Other processes also contribute to the loss of diaphragmatic function. The administration of opiates and sedatives, sepsis, and malnutrition all contribute to diminishing the neural activation of respiratory muscles and augments disuse atrophy through increased mitochondrial oxidative stress (MOS). MOS induces proteolytic degradation of myosin, calcium desensitisation, and a decrease in protein synthesis which underpins VIDD [70]. Furthermore, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) associated with MV promotes protease activation, which in turn induces cytoskeletal protein degradation, proteolysis, and sarcomere disruption (Fig. 2) [71]. Collectively this biomechanical cellular disturbance contributes to weaning failure.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationship between mechanical ventilation and ventilation induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD)

VIDD can be addressed by early commencement of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) [72]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that IMT improved maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures and was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation and weaning [73]. A recent study of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 survivors showed that inspiratory muscle strength impairments persisted 6 months after ICU discharge, supporting the continued use of IMT after ICU discharge to optimise QOL, especially for patients requiring prolonged MV and experiencing ongoing inspiratory muscle weakness [74, 75]. External diaphragm pacing may increase diaphragmatic activity during MV and has the potential to increase the number of slow-twitch fibres, but its role in ICU patients requires further evaluation [69].

Impact on outcomes and challenges

Collectively and individually, these interventions have shown positive outcomes, including decreased muscle atrophy, reduced days on mechanical ventilation, decreased length of stay in ICU, improved functional capacity at time of hospital discharge, and reduced incidence of delirium and post-operative pulmonary complications [26, 76, 77]. However, studies have not found a long-term impact on outcomes, such as improved mortality or QOL at 6 or 12 months post-discharge [77, 78].

Effect of exercise therapy on cognitive function

Cognitive impairment is common after an ICU admission and summarised in Table 2 [79,80,81]. Post-ICU cognitive impairment is also complex and associated with multiple patient- and clinical risk factors (Fig. 3). A major risk factor for developing cognitive impairment is delirium during ICU admission [82]. Pre-existing cognitive impairment increases patients’ susceptibility to ICU delirium [83], and in patients who developed delirium, those with previous cognitive impairment demonstrated a significantly accelerated cognitive decline over the next 5 years [84]. A relationship between pre-existing depression and post-ICU memory impairment has also been reported [85]. Clinical factors associated with impaired cerebral perfusion such as hypoxia, hypotension, sepsis, systemic inflammatory reactions, toxic effects of drugs, and impaired glycaemic control, were reported to be related to poor cognitive outcomes [86, 87], delirium, and sleep disturbance [88]. It has been postulated that critical illness is associated with disruption of the blood brain barrier, increased intracranial pressure, brain oedema, and alterations in cerebral perfusion [89, 90]. Cerebral blood flow velocity has been shown to deviate by more than 20–30% in critically ill patients with respiratory failure [91].

Table 2 At a glance summary of cognitive impairment in ICU
Fig. 3
figure 3

Factors that influence post-ICU cognitive outcomes

ET in ICU has been demonstrated to be a successful intervention to modify post-ICU neuropsychiatric outcomes [92] and prevent delirium [93, 94]. The neuroprotective effects of exercise are well established [95]. ET protects cognition in ICU patients directly through promotion of cerebral perfusion, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and neuroplasticity, and by enabling increased social interaction, all of which have been implicated in reducing the risk of delirium [92, 96]. Acute aerobic exercise increases cerebral glucose metabolism and oxygenated haemoglobin [97, 98]. Regular exercise also provides a routine that can help maintain circadian rhythms while in ICU, with regularity and timing of exercise a known zeitgeber [99]. In addition to the effects in reducing insomnia [100], ET may assist with maintenance of circadian rhythms and further improve the quality and consistency of sleep during ICU stay, and subsequently minimise risk of delirium and cognitive problems.

Improved physical function through ET further enhance patients’ capacity for mobilisation and social engagement post-discharge. Immobility is closely connected to malnutrition [101], which predisposes the ICU patient to ongoing cognitive impairment [102]. Studies have shown that exercise post-ICU further improves cognitive function, however the mechanisms linking exercise and improved neuropsychological functioning are not yet fully elucidated and warrants further investigation [13]. Available evidence suggests that chronic aerobic exercise can alter levels of circulating growth factors (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin-like growth factor, and vessel endothelial growth factors) that promote gliogenesis, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and angiogenesis, all essential processes for neuroplasticity [103]. In short, exercise increases white matter volume through upregulation of gliogenic and neurogenic processes and increases grey matter volume through gliogenesis, neurogenesis, and synaptogenesis [104]. Through increased cerebral blood flow, exercise promotes angiogenesis and supports neuronal growth and synapse formation, thereby improving cognitive and motor function [104] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A brief summary of mechanisms of exercise effects on physical, cognitive, mental functions (BDNF brain-derived neurotrophic factor)

Effect of exercise therapy on mental function

Psychiatric disorders in ICU are summarised in Table 3 [2]. While some symptoms can improve as part of the natural recovery process, others can persist for years. Post-ICU psychiatric morbidity is often comorbid and complicates physical and cognitive recovery, with a recent study showing it was significantly associated with functional and physical impairment, pain, social functioning, and QOL [3, 40, 105].

Table 3 At a glance summary of psychiatric disorder in ICU

The causes of post-ICU psychiatric morbidity are complex. Many aspects of ICU care inevitably restrict personal autonomy [106]. Combined with physical discomfort and fear of dying, this can lead to intense feelings of helplessness and fear, which can contribute to a subsequent acute stress reaction or PTSD [107]. Patients with PTSD can develop a heightened startle response, nightmares, and flashbacks to traumatic experiences and memories, and avoid triggering stimuli which elicit strong emotional and physiological reactions [108]. This may include sounds that remind them of ICU alarms or ambulance sirens, smells associated with anaesthetic agents, or being restrained in a bed. Avoiding such stimuli can lead to increasing social isolation and reduced exercise and activity levels, thus impairing post-ICU recovery. The loss of personal autonomy in ICU can also contribute to anxiety, especially when the patient feels insufficiently informed on the progress of their care and what might happen next. Situations where the patient’s ability to communicate is impaired are particularly high risk for the patient to feel less informed in their care and less in control [109]. Anxiety can manifest as generalised anxiety disorder, health anxiety, or a panic disorder. Depression can present with low mood, loss of interest and hope, as well as reduced appetite and disturbed sleeping patterns [110]. This can impede recovery via reduced nutrition and mobilisation, as well as impeding effort and motivation during recovery-oriented activities such as ET.

There are direct and indirect physiological mechanisms through which ET in ICU and after discharge could improve psychiatric outcomes, with the association between exercise and improved mental health being well established (Fig. 4) [40, 111]. Studies on the effect of ET on mental health have demonstrated the relationship between depression, anxiety, and physical exercise associated with modulation of BDNF levels and oxidative stress [112,113,114]. ET provides the patient with opportunities to have regular interactions with another person and requires close dialogue between patient and staff. This provides a regular opportunity for interpersonal connection and thus reduces isolation. During ET, patients can obtain more information about their overall progress and thereby feel more in control over their own recovery. Further, patients need to have lower sedation levels to participate in ET, which increases alertness levels and communication. ET also provides an opportunity for the patient to express that they are experiencing psychiatric symptoms during their sessions, or for staff to identify an emerging psychiatric condition earlier in its trajectory through early warning signs of depression (such as reduced effort during exercises) or PTSD (such as signs of panic and aversion to certain stimuli).

How to maximise and enhance the effect of exercise therapy

To maximise and enhance the effects of ET, several essential co-interventions in ICU have been proposed. Nutrition therapy in critical illness should be optimised to meet the demands of patients. Optimised nutrition provision ensuring sufficient protein and energy delivery is essential to maximise the effects of ET and support muscle protein synthesis, muscle growth and repair, prevent ICUAW, and maintain muscle function/performance [115]. As energy restriction is common in the first week of ICU admission to avoid overfeeding [116], performing ET can dry out glycogen storage in organs if inadequate nutrition is delivered [117]. Providing adequate protein is important, aiming for ≥ 1.2 g/kg from ICU admission. A recent RCT demonstrated that high protein provision significantly decreased muscle volume loss even under low energy delivery, when combined with electrical muscle stimulation [118]. Although the optimal protein amount to be provided for critically ill patients is still under investigation, higher protein provision is proposed to have positive impacts on muscle maintenance and should be prioritised to maximise the effects of ET rather than aggressively increasing the energy intake in the acute phase of ICU admission [119, 120]. Swallowing training should also be incorporated if necessary to achieve adequate nutrition via several routes of nutrition intake.

Vitamins and minerals, such as selenium, vitamin C and D, arginine, glutamine, and omega-3 fatty acids, are also considered potential supplements for patients [20, 121]. These are essential for maintaining the homeostasis of the muscle environment, however, the role of these nutrients in combination with ET are not examined, and robust studies comprising adaptive design may be warranted. Similarly, specific agents aiming at improving muscle synthesis, such as beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl butyrate [122] or oxandrolone [123], have been investigated in critically ill patients to improve physical outcomes, with the evidence currently being inconclusive.

Implementation of the ABCDEF bundle has been recommended to optimise ICU care and outcomes. It has been reported that non-compliance of the ABCDEF bundle significantly inhibits the implementation of ET in ICU [124], directly resulting in poor outcomes [125]. Optimised sedation and pain control [126] and delirium management [127] are essential for the successful implementation of ET. Furthermore, family involvement in ET has potential benefits of emotional support and improved motivation for ICU patients [128]. Evidence is emerging that unrestricted visiting access improves patient outcomes [129]. Notably, the ABCDEF bundle is an integrated approach in which all components are mutually interactive with each other to maximise the effects. Staged implementation of the bundle has been shown to be effective and the positive effects were increased as more components of the bundle were in place [130]. Recently, it has been suggested that the bundle should be expanded to the ABCDEFGHI bundle, incorporating more holistic care and providing an improved ‘home-like’ and healing ICU environment [21].

In addition, the use of ICU diaries, access to natural light, optimisation of the sleep environment, and introduction of telehealth technology are also potential measures to efficiently facilitate ET in ICU and enhance its overall effects.

Emerging technologies

Whilst early ET in ICU has been shown to reduce incidences of ICUAW and improve short-term physical-related outcomes, these benefits are not retained longer term [131]. Also, many patients are currently unable or unwilling to participate in ET in ICU for multiple reasons. Therefore, the incorporation of new/emerging technologies such as virtual reality (VR), gaming consoles, modifications to the ICU environment, and the use of ‘apps’ and telehealth could be considered adjunct therapies to ET.

VR immerses a person into a completely simulated environment with 360 degree vision and simulated, active movements [132]. The implementation of VR in ICU has proven to be safe and feasible, whilst also demonstrating promising results in cognitive/psychological domains such as reduced anxiety, pain levels, and delirium [132,133,134,135]. VR was shown to be successful in promoting ET (via full gameplay in bed or chair) in small studies [136, 137]. ET has also been safely delivered in ICU via gaming platforms such as Nintendo Wii™ and Xbox Kinect Jintronix virtual therapy system, with studies reporting high patient engagement levels and no adverse events [138,139,140]. However, larger studies in adults are required for both VR and gaming platforms.

Other novel therapies to improve access to early ET in ICU may include interventions such as rehabilitation robotics and/or exoskeleton robots. Robots designed for assisting patient treatments in ICU are mostly either in development, or at present, only able to assist with manual handling tasks such as hoisting/lifting/turning patients in bed [141]. Exoskeletons are a wearable robotic device with in-built motors to assist in upper or lower limb movements, primarily used in neurological rehabilitation for conditions such as spinal cord injury [142]. They have been proposed as a strategy to facilitate out-of-bed mobilisation for ICU patients [143]. However, proposed exoskeleton devices remain in their infancy for the critically ill population, with limited studies investigating back-support exoskeletons worn by staff to reduce physical burden during patient handling [144], body weight supported robotic gait retraining (Lokomat) [145], robotic mobilisation devices such as the VEMOTION® that can be attached to a specific patient bed [146, 147], and upper limb robotic devices such as the Armeo©Spring [145]. Whilst currently proposed as useful adjunctive therapies for traditional ET, future research is required to determine feasibility, safety, and benefits of these devices.

There is a growing awareness and recognition of the link between the physical ICU environment and patient outcomes [148,149,150]. Patients and staff are reporting that small, cluttered, and suboptimal physical environments can impede delivery of best care (including ET) and contribute to staff injuries and poor outcomes [151, 152]. Recent projects have shown that optimisation of the ICU environment is possible, however there is no evidence to date regarding the impact on patient outcomes [153]. It is essential that future ICU designs consider the recent changing of models of care from sedated to awake patients and provide an environment where provision of ET is enabled (including sufficient space to store rehabilitation equipment).

In post-hospital discharge settings, delivery of ET via the application of apps and/or videoconference (telerehabilitation), can provide a seamless transition from ICU/hospital to home-based care [154]. These digital platforms can offer personalised exercise regimens tailored to individual patient needs, crucial for the complex and often varied symptomology associated with PICS. Recent studies have demonstrated the non-inferiority of telerehabilitation programs to usual centre/clinic-based follow-up programs [155, 156]. Features such as exercise reminders, individualised goal setting, and progress tracking enhance treatment adherence, while also reducing healthcare costs by minimising the need for frequent in-person consultations. By allowing remote access to specialised care, these platforms overcome geographical limitations, enabling particularly those in rural or remote areas to continue their recovery. Data analytics can further fine-tune treatment plans and provide valuable insights for ongoing research. Overall, the adoption of telehealth and app-based solutions in post-ICU rehabilitation has the potential to overcome current barriers associated with ICU follow-up services and improve both functional outcomes and QOL for survivors of critical illness [157, 158].

Future research direction

Historically, the PICS population has been treated as a homogenous group. However, it is becoming increasingly evident that this population is inherently heterogeneous. Distinct phenotypes or subtypes within PICS may exist, with patients displaying different patterns of symptoms and recovery trajectories [4, 159, 160]. Understanding these classifications can pave the way for tailored treatments, addressing the unique needs of each subgroup [161]. Future research should aim to identify these phenotypes, which would facilitate targeted and individualised ET interventions in ICU and after discharge.

Another pivotal area for investigation is the prediction of ICU survivors at risk of developing PICS [162]. Early prediction/identification can result in timely interventions, potentially preventing, halting, or attenuating the progression of PICS [163]. Combining biomarkers, genetic predispositions, and clinical indicators into the prediction tool might offer a more reliable model [164]. Integrating such predictors into clinical practice can serve as an early warning system, ensuring prompt actions for those deemed at risk.

In addition, future research is unlikely to focus on ET performed in isolation, instead, delivered as multi-dimension interventions incorporating intensive nutritional strategies, strategies to improve sleep and other environmental factors, and ET delivered as part of PICS prevention bundles (including the ABCDEF bundle) [21, 30, 165]. Collaborative trials integrating multiple preventative measures can illuminate the optimal combination of strategies to overcome all aspects of PICS, with evaluation of impact on cognitive and mental health as well as physical outcomes [21, 30, 166]. It is also essential that future studies explore the optimal dosing and timing of ET delivery (e.g. intensity, duration, frequency).

In line with optimising the multi-dimensional ET approaches in ICU, developing an improved follow-up pathway in post-ICU settings is another priority to advance our understanding of the long-term effects of ICU admission and facilitate the recovery from PICS [50, 167]. Consistent and evidence-based post-ICU programs with regular monitoring may not only address the existing PICS, but also prevent new onset of problems, facilitating functional independence and potentially accelerating the return to pre-illness function and QOL.

Conclusion

Despite the evolving understanding of the effects of ET on PICS, there are still multiple gaps in the current evidence, underscoring the necessity for further extensive research. By ensuring individualised assessments and interventions are delivered at the right time and continuing after hospital discharge, exploring the optimisation of ET dosing and methodology of evaluation on patient outcomes, whilst incorporating multi-faceted preventive measures and prediction models, we can usher in a new era of PICS management and prevention. This essential work should be prioritised to achieve the goal of ensuring ICU survivors do not merely survive but thrive in their post-ICU lives.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activity of daily living

BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CIM:

Critical illness myopathy

CIP:

Critical illness polyneuropathy

ET:

Exercise therapy

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

ICUAW:

ICU-acquired weakness

IMT:

Inspiratory muscle training

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IL:

Interleukin

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

mTOR:

Mechanistic target of rapamycin

MRC:

Medical Research Council

MOS:

Mitochondrial oxidative stress

PICS:

Post-intensive care syndrome

PTSD:

Post-traumatic stress disorder

QOL:

Quality of life

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

VIDD:

Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction

VR:

Virtual reality

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Desai SV, Law TJ, Needham DM. Long-term complications of critical care. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:371–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey MA, Davidson JE. Postintensive Care Syndrome: Right Care, Right Now…and Later. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:381–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:502–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hiser SL, Fatima A, Ali M, Needham DM. Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates. J Intensive Care Med. 2023;11:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clancy O, Edginton T, Casarin A, Vizcaychipi MP. The psychological and neurocognitive consequences of critical illness. A pragmatic review of current evidence. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:226–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kress JP, Hall JB. ICU-acquired weakness and recovery from critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1626–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas P, Baldwin C, Beach L, Bissett B, Boden I, Cruz SM, et al. Physiotherapy management for COVID-19 in the acute hospital setting and beyond: an update to clinical practice recommendations. J Physiother. 2022;68:8–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, Gong Y, Zhang C, Meng P, Gai Y, Han X, et al. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with early rehabilitation therapy on mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23:272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Berney S, Haines K, Denehy L. Physiotherapy in critical care in Australia. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012;23:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nickels MR, Aitken LM, Barnett AG, Walsham J, McPhail SM. Acceptability, safety, and feasibility of in-bed cycling with critically ill patients. Aust Crit Care. 2020;33:236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vollenweider R, Manettas AI, Häni N, de Bruin ED, Knols RH. Passive motion of the lower extremities in sedated and ventilated patients in the ICU - a systematic review of early effects and replicability of Interventions. PLoS ONE. 2022;17: e0267255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gan X-Y, Zhang J, Xu P, Liu S-J, Guo Z-L. Early passive orthostatic training prevents diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction in intensive care unit patients on mechanical ventilation: A retrospective case-control study. Heart Lung. 2023;59:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson JC, Ely EW, Morey MC, Anderson VM, Denne LB, Clune J, et al. Cognitive and physical rehabilitation of intensive care unit survivors: results of the RETURN randomized controlled pilot investigation. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1088–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu K, Ogura T, Takahashi K, Nakamura M, Ohtake H, Fujiduka K, et al. The safety of a novel early mobilization protocol conducted by ICU physicians: a prospective observational study. J Intensive Care Med. 2018;6:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nydahl P, Sricharoenchai T, Chandra S, Kundt FS, Huang M, Fischill M, et al. Safety of patient mobilization and rehabilitation in the intensive care unit. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:766–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kho ME, Berney S, Connolly B. Physical rehabilitation in the intensive care unit: past, present, and future. Intensive Care Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07099-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hodgson CL, Kho ME, da Silva VM. To mobilise or not to mobilise: is that the right question? Intensive Care Med. 2023;49:1000–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mion LC, Tan A, Brockman A, Tate JA, Vasilevskis EE, Pun BT, et al. An exploration of critical care professionals’ strategies to enhance daily implementation of the assess, prevent, and manage pain; both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; choice of analgesia and sedation; delirium assess, prevent, and manage; early mobility and exercise; and family engagement and empowerment: a group concept mapping study. Critical Care Explorations. 2023;5: e0872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Renner C, Jeitziner M-M, Albert M, Brinkmann S, Diserens K, Dzialowski I, et al. Guideline on multimodal rehabilitation for patients with post-intensive care syndrome. Crit Care. 2023;27:301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Calder PC, Casaer M, Hiesmayr M, et al. ESPEN practical and partially revised guideline: clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2023;42:1671–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotfis K, van Diem-Zaal I, Roberson SW, Sietnicki M, van den Boogaard M, Shehabi Y, et al. The future of intensive care: delirium should no longer be an issue. Crit Care. 2022;26:200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schrempf MC, Zanker J, Arndt TT, Vlasenko D, Anthuber M, Müller G, et al. Immersive virtual reality fitness games to improve recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized single blind controlled pilot trial. Games Health J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2023.0004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferre M, Batista E, Solanas A, Martínez-Ballesté A. Smart health-enhanced early mobilisation in intensive care units. Sensors. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuest KE, Ulm B, Daum N, Lindholz M, Lorenz M, Blobner K, et al. Clustering of critically ill patients using an individualized learning approach enables dose optimization of mobilization in the ICU. Crit Care. 2023;27:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Narváez-Martínez MA, Henao-Castaño ÁM. Severity classification and influencing variables of the Postintensive Care Syndrome. Enferm Intensiva. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2023.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. TEAM Study Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Hodgson CL, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Brickell K, Broadley T, et al. Early Active Mobilization during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2022. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2209083

  27. Paton Michelle, Chan Sarah, Tipping Claire J., Stratton Anne, Serpa Neto Ary, Lane Rebecca, et al. The effect of mobilization at 6 months after critical illness—meta-analysis. NEJM Evidence. 2023;2:EVIDoa2200234.

  28. Liu K, Nakamura K, Katsukawa H, Nydahl P, Ely EW, Kudchadkar SR, et al. Implementation of the ABCDEF bundle for critically Ill ICU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-national 1-day point prevalence study. Front Med. 2021;8:2016.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu K, Nakamura K, Katsukawa H, Elhadi M, Nydahl P, Ely EW, et al. ABCDEF bundle and supportive ICU practices for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection: an international point prevalence study. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3: e0353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ely EW. The ABCDEF bundle: science and philosophy of how ICU liberation serves patients and families. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:321–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dubb R, Nydahl P, Hermes C, Schwabbauer N, Toonstra A, Parker AM, et al. Barriers and strategies for early mobilization of patients in intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:724–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Patel MC. Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS): Physical Therapist Role in Recovery. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023;1–6.

  33. Liu K, Ogura T, Takahashi K, Nakamura M, Ohtake H, Fujiduka K, et al. A progressive early mobilization program is significantly associated with clinical and economic improvement: a single-center quality comparison study. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:e744–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hodgson CL, Stiller K, Needham DM, Tipping CJ, Harrold M, Baldwin CE, et al. Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2014;18:658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyd J, Paratz J, Tronstad O, Caruana L, McCormack P, Walsh J. When is it safe to exercise mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit? An evaluation of consensus recommendations in a cardiothoracic setting. Heart Lung. 2018;47:81–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Parry SM, Nydahl P, Needham DM. Implementing early physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the ICU: institutional, clinician, and patient considerations. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:470–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hyde-Wyatt J, Garside J. Critical care outreach: a valuable resource? Nurs Crit Care. 2020;25:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cuthbertson BH. The impact of critical care outreach: is there one? Crit Care. 2007;11:179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Taito S, Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto Y, Banno M, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y. Does enhanced physical rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge improve outcomes in patients who received mechanical ventilation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e026075.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive care syndrome: an overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017;5:90–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Inoue S, Hatakeyama J, Kondo Y, Hifumi T, Sakuramoto H, Kawasaki T, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome: its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directions. Acute Med Surg. 2019;6:233–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams TA, Leslie GD. Challenges and possible solutions for long-term follow-up of patients surviving critical illness. Aust Crit Care. 2011;24:175–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cox NS, Oliveira CC, Lahham A, Holland AE. Pulmonary rehabilitation referral and participation are commonly influenced by environment, knowledge, and beliefs about consequences: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework. J Physiother. 2017;63:84–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chindhy S, Taub PR, Lavie CJ, Shen J. Current challenges in cardiac rehabilitation: strategies to overcome social factors and attendance barriers. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020;18:777–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action: 6–7 February 2017, Executive Boardroom, WHO Headquarters, meeting report. World Health Organization; 2020.

  46. Puhan MA, Gimeno-Santos E, Cates CJ, Troosters T. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD005305.

  47. Mampuya WM. Cardiac rehabilitation past, present and future: an overview. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:38–49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Held N, Moss M. Optimizing Post-Intensive Care Unit Rehabilitation. Turk Thorac J. 2019;20:147–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Teixeira C, Rosa RG. Post-intensive care outpatient clinic: is it feasible and effective? A literature review. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018;30:98–111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Schofield-Robinson OJ, Lewis SR, Smith AF, McPeake J, Alderson P. Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:CD012701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rosa RG, Ferreira GE, Viola TW, Robinson CC, Kochhann R, Berto PP, et al. Effects of post-ICU follow-up on subject outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2019;52:115–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Voiriot G, Oualha M, Pierre A, Salmon-Gandonnière C, Gaudet A, Jouan Y, et al. Chronic critical illness and post-intensive care syndrome: from pathophysiology to clinical challenges. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Boelens YFN, Melchers M, van Zanten ARH. Poor physical recovery after critical illness: incidence, features, risk factors, pathophysiology, and evidence-based therapies. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000955.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Fazzini B, Märkl T, Costas C, Blobner M, Schaller SJ, Prowle J, et al. The rate and assessment of muscle wasting during critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2023;27:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013;310:1591–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lad H, Saumur TM, Herridge MS, Dos Santos CC, Mathur S, Batt J, et al. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: not just another muscle atrophying condition. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21217840.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Levine S, Nguyen T, Taylor N, Friscia ME, Budak MT, Rothenberg P, et al. Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1327–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jaber S, Petrof BJ, Jung B, Chanques G, Berthet J-P, Rabuel C, et al. Rapidly progressive diaphragmatic weakness and injury during mechanical ventilation in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:364–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Goligher EC, Dres M, Fan E, Rubenfeld GD, Scales DC, Herridge MS, et al. Mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragm atrophy strongly impacts clinical outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:204–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Judemann K, Lunz D, Zausig YA, Graf BM. Zink W [Intensive care unit-acquired weakness in the critically ill: critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy]. Anaesthesist. 2011;60:887–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sandri M. Protein breakdown in muscle wasting: role of autophagy-lysosome and ubiquitin-proteasome. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:2121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168:960–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Graham ZA, Lavin KM, O’Bryan SM, Thalacker-Mercer AE, Buford TW, Ford KM, et al. Mechanisms of exercise as a preventative measure to muscle wasting. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;321:C40-57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Talbot J, Maves L. Skeletal muscle fiber type: using insights from muscle developmental biology to dissect targets for susceptibility and resistance to muscle disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2016;5:518–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang Y, Pessin JE. Mechanisms for fiber-type specificity of skeletal muscle atrophy. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013;16:243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Ramírez-Vélez R, García-Hermoso A, Martínez-Velilla N, Zambom-Ferraresi F, L Sáez de Asteasu M, Recarey AE, et al. Effects of exercise interventions on inflammatory parameters in acutely hospitalized older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med Res 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020290

  67. Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:607–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tang H, Lee M, Budak MT, Pietras N, Hittinger S, Vu M, et al. Intrinsic apoptosis in mechanically ventilated human diaphragm: linkage to a novel Fos/FoxO1/Stat3-Bim axis. FASEB J. 2011;25:2921–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Peñuelas O, Keough E, López-Rodríguez L, Carriedo D, Gonçalves G, Barreiro E, et al. Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction: translational mechanisms lead to therapeutical alternatives in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019;7:48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Tang H, Lee M, Sharpe O, Salamone L, Noonan EJ, Hoang CD, et al. Oxidative stress-responsive microRNA-320 regulates glycolysis in diverse biological systems. FASEB J. 2012;26:4710–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Whidden MA, Smuder AJ, Wu M, Hudson MB, Nelson WB, Powers SK. Oxidative stress is required for mechanical ventilation-induced protease activation in the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:1376–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Ahmed S, Daniel Martin A, Smith BK. Inspiratory muscle training in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: narrative review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2019;30:44–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Vorona S, Sabatini U, Al-Maqbali S, Bertoni M, Dres M, Bissett B, et al. Inspiratory muscle rehabilitation in critically ill adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15:735–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Núñez-Seisdedos MN, Valcárcel-Linares D, Gómez-González MT, Lázaro-Navas I, López-González L, Pecos-Martín D, et al. Inspiratory muscle strength and function in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 survivors 3 and 6 months after intensive care unit discharge. ERJ Open Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00329-2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Bissett BM, Leditschke IA, Neeman T, Boots R, Paratz J. Inspiratory muscle training to enhance recovery from mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial. Thorax. 2016;71:812–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Baron MV, Silva PE, Koepp J, Urbanetto J de S, Santamaria AFM, Dos Santos MP, et al. Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12:53.

  77. Alaparthi GK, Gatty A, Samuel SR, Amaravadi SK. Effectiveness, safety, and barriers to early mobilization in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Res Pract. 2020;2020:7840743.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Hodgson CL, Capell E, Tipping CJ. Early mobilization of patients in intensive care: organization, communication and safety factors that influence translation into clinical practice. Crit Care. 2018;22:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Jha SR, Hannu MK, Gore K, Chang S, Newton P, Wilhelm K, et al. Cognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of physical frailty for mortality in patients with advanced heart failure referred for heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:1092–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Honarmand K, Lalli RS, Priestap F, Chen JL, McIntyre CW, Owen AM, et al. Natural history of cognitive impairment in critical illness survivors. A systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:193–201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Hopkins RO, Weaver LK, Collingridge D, Parkinson RB, Chan KJ, Orme JF Jr. Two-year cognitive, emotional, and quality-of-life outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:340–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Lee M, Kang J, Jeong YJ. Risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care. 2020;33:287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Zaal IJ, Devlin JW, Peelen LM, Slooter AJC. A systematic review of risk factors for delirium in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Gross AL, Jones RN, Habtemariam DA, Fong TG, Tommet D, Quach L, et al. Delirium and long-term cognitive trajectory among persons with dementia. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1324–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Adhikari NKJ, Tansey CM, McAndrews MP, Matté A, Pinto R, Cheung AM, et al. Self-reported depressive symptoms and memory complaints in survivors five years after ARDS. Chest. 2011;140:1484–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mikkelsen ME, Christie JD, Lanken PN, Biester RC, Thompson BT, Bellamy SL, et al. The adult respiratory distress syndrome cognitive outcomes study: long-term neuropsychological function in survivors of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:1307–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010;304:1787–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Lim ASP, Kowgier M, Yu L, Buchman AS, Bennett DA. Sleep fragmentation and the risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive decline in older persons. Sleep. 2013;36:1027–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Hughes CG, Pandharipande PP, Thompson JL, Chandrasekhar R, Ware LB, Ely EW, et al. Endothelial activation and blood-brain barrier injury as risk factors for delirium in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:e809–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Kinoshita K. Traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology for neurocritical care. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;4:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Slessarev M, Mahmoud O, McIntyre CW, Ellis CG. Cerebral blood flow deviations in critically ill patients: potential insult contributing to ischemic and hyperemic injury. Front Med. 2020;7: 615318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Hopkins RO, Suchyta MR, Farrer TJ, Needham D. Improving post-intensive care unit neuropsychiatric outcomes: understanding cognitive effects of physical activity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:1220–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Liang S, Chau JPC, Lo SHS, Zhao J, Choi KC. Effects of nonpharmacological delirium-prevention interventions on critically ill patients’ clinical, psychological, and family outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care. 2021;34:378–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e825–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Demurtas J, Schoene D, Torbahn G, Marengoni A, Grande G, Zou L, et al. Physical activity and exercise in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: an umbrella review of intervention and observational studies. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:1415-1422.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Nydahl P, Jeitziner M-M, Vater V, Sivarajah S, Howroyd F, McWilliams D, et al. Early mobilisation for prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022;103334.

  97. Brugniaux JV, Marley CJ, Hodson DA, New KJ, Bailey DM. Acute exercise stress reveals cerebrovascular benefits associated with moderate gains in cardiorespiratory fitness. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:1873–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Lefferts WK, Babcock MC, Tiss MJ, Ives SJ, White CN, Brutsaert TD, et al. Effect of hypoxia on cerebrovascular and cognitive function during moderate intensity exercise. Physiol Behav. 2016;165:108–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Gabriel BM, Zierath JR. Circadian rhythms and exercise—re-setting the clock in metabolic disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15:197–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Milne S, Elkins MR. Exercise as an alternative treatment for chronic insomnia (PEDro synthesis). Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:479–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Cederholm T, Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, Maggio M, Lauretani F, Ceda GP, et al. The role of malnutrition in older persons with mobility limitations. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:3173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Dominguez LJ, Veronese N, Vernuccio L, Catanese G, Inzerillo F, Salemi G, et al. Nutrition, physical activity, and other lifestyle factors in the prevention of cognitive decline and dementia. Nutrients. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13114080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Cheng A, Coksaygan T, Tang H, Khatri R, Balice-Gordon RJ, Rao MS, et al. Truncated tyrosine kinase B brain-derived neurotrophic factor receptor directs cortical neural stem cells to a glial cell fate by a novel signaling mechanism. J Neurochem. 2007;100:1515–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. El-Sayes J, Harasym D, Turco CV, Locke MB, Nelson AJ. Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity. Neuroscientist. 2019;25:65–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Ramnarain D, Pouwels S, Fernández-Gonzalo S, Navarra-Ventura G, Balanzá-Martinez V. Delirium-related psychiatric and neurocognitive impairment and the association with post intensive care syndrome- a narrative review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Flaws D, Patterson S, Bagshaw T, Boon K, Kenardy J, Sellers D, et al. Caring for critically ill patients with a mental illness: A discursive paper providing an overview and case exploration of the delivery of intensive care to people with psychiatric comorbidity. Nurs Open. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1935.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Karnatovskaia LV, Johnson MM, Benzo RP, Gajic O. The spectrum of psychocognitive morbidity in the critically ill: a review of the literature and call for improvement. J Crit Care. 2015;30:130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Davydow DS, Gifford JM, Desai SV, Needham DM, Bienvenu OJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30:421–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Stevenson JE, Colantuoni E, Bienvenu OJ, Sricharoenchai T, Wozniak A, Shanholtz C, et al. General anxiety symptoms after acute lung injury: predictors and correlates. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75:287–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Davydow DS, Gifford JM, Desai SV, Bienvenu OJ, Needham DM. Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:796–809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Smith PJ, Merwin RM. The role of exercise in management of mental health disorders: an integrative review. Annu Rev Med. 2021;72:45–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Mandolesi L, Polverino A, Montuori S, Foti F, Ferraioli G, Sorrentino P, et al. Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: biological and psychological benefits. Front Psychol. 2018;9:509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Coelho FG de M, Gobbi S, Andreatto CAA, Corazza DI, Pedroso RV, Santos-Galduróz RF. Physical exercise modulates peripheral levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF): a systematic review of experimental studies in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56:10–5.

  114. Thomson D, Turner A, Lauder S, Gigler ME, Berk L, Singh AB, et al. A brief review of exercise, bipolar disorder, and mechanistic pathways. Front Psychol. 2015;6:147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Jäger R, Kerksick CM, Campbell BI, Cribb PJ, Wells SD, Skwiat TM, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: protein and exercise. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Compher C, Bingham AL, McCall M, Patel J, Rice TW, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46:12–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Uehara M, Plank LD, Hill GL. Components of energy expenditure in patients with severe sepsis and major trauma: a basis for clinical care. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1295–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Nakamura K, Nakano H, Naraba H, Mochizuki M, Takahashi Y, Sonoo T, et al. High protein versus medium protein delivery under equal total energy delivery in critical care: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:796–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Nakanishi N, Matsushima S, Tatsuno J, Liu K, Tamura T, Yonekura H, et al. Impact of energy and protein delivery to critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224849.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Lee Z-Y, Yap CSL, Hasan MS, Engkasan JP, Barakatun-Nisak MY, Day AG, et al. The effect of higher versus lower protein delivery in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2021;25:260.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Hill A, Elke G, Weimann A. Nutrition in the intensive care unit-a narrative review. Nutrients. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Nakamura K, Kihata A, Naraba H, Kanda N, Takahashi Y, Sonoo T, et al. β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, arginine, and glutamine complex on muscle volume loss in critically ill patients: a randomized control trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44:205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Demling RH, DeSanti L. Oxandrolone induced lean mass gain during recovery from severe burns is maintained after discontinuation of the anabolic steroid. Burns. 2003;29:793–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Balas MC, Vasilevskis EE, Olsen KM, Schmid KK, Shostrom V, Cohen MZ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of the awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring/management, and early exercise/mobility bundle. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1024–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Pun BT, Balas MC, Barnes-Daly MA, Thompson JL, Aldrich JM, Barr J, et al. Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF bundle: results of the ICU liberation collaborative in over 15,000 adults. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:3–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Kanda N, Nakano H, Naraba H, Kawasaki A, Ohno N, Yoshikawa Y, et al. The efficacy and safety of nurse-initiated sedation management in an intensive care unit: A two-phase prospective study in Japan. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2022;19: e12486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Kresevic DM, Miller D, Fuseck CW, Wade M, Whitney L, Conley M, et al. Assessment and management of delirium in critically ill veterans. Crit Care Nurse. 2020;40:42–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Haines KJ. Engaging families in rehabilitation of people who are critically ill: an underutilized resource. Phys Ther. 2018;98:737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Wu Y, Wang G, Zhang Z, Fan L, Ma F, Yue W, et al. Efficacy and safety of unrestricted visiting policy for critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2022;26:267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Hsieh SJ, Otusanya O, Gershengorn HB, Hope AA, Dayton C, Levi D, et al. Staged implementation of awakening and breathing, coordination, delirium monitoring and management, and early mobilization bundle improves patient outcomes and reduces hospital costs. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:885–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Fuke R, Hifumi T, Kondo Y, Hatakeyama J, Takei T, Yamakawa K, et al. Early rehabilitation to prevent postintensive care syndrome in patients with critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8: e019998.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Oliveira I, Afonso A, Oliveira E, Coimbra J, Rodrigues NF. Design principles for cognitive and physical rehabilitation of ICU patients using Virtual Reality (VR). 2022 IEEE 10th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health(SeGAH). IEEE; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEGAH54908.2022.9978575

  133. Vlake JH, Van Bommel J, Wils E-J, Korevaar TIM, Bienvenu OJ, Klijn E, et al. Virtual reality to improve sequelae of the postintensive care syndrome: a multicenter, randomized controlled feasibility study. Crit Care Explor. 2021;3: e0538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Jawed YT, Golovyan D, Lopez D, Khan SH, Wang S, Freund C, et al. Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention in the intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 2021;50:748–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Merliot-Gailhoustet L, Raimbert C, Garnier O, Carr J, De Jong A, Molinari N, et al. Discomfort improvement for critically ill patients using electronic relaxation devices: results of the cross-over randomized controlled trial E-CHOISIR (Electronic-CHOIce of a System for Intensive care Relaxation). Crit Care. 2022;26:263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Hemphill S, Nguyen A, Kwong J, Rodriguez ST, Wang E, Caruso TJ. Virtual reality facilitates engagement in physical therapy in the pediatric CVICU. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2021;33:E7-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Lai B, Powell M, Clement AG, Davis D, Swanson-Kimani E, Hayes L. Examining the feasibility of early mobilization with virtual reality gaming using head-mounted display and adaptive software with adolescents in the pediatric intensive care unit: case report. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8: e28210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Gomes TT, Schujmann DS, Fu C. Rehabilitation through virtual reality: physical activity of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31:456–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Abdulsatar F, Walker RG, Timmons BW, Choong K. ‘Wii-Hab’ in critically ill children: a pilot trial. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2013;6:193–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Parke S, Hough CL, E Bunnell A. The Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Therapy Environments for Early ICU Mobilization. PMR. 2020;12:1214–21.

  141. Kosa G, Morozov O, Lehmann A, Pargger H, Marsch S, Hunziker P. Robots and Intelligent Medical Devices in the Intensive Care Unit: Vision, State of the Art, and Economic Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics. 2023;5:2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Plaza A, Hernandez M, Puyuelo G, Garces E, Garcia E. Wearable rehabilitation exoskeletons of the lower limb: analysis of versatility and adaptability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023;18:392–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Luetz A, Grunow JJ, Mörgeli R, Rosenthal M, Weber-Carstens S, Weiss B, et al. Innovative ICU solutions to prevent and reduce delirium and post-intensive care unit syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;40:673–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Settembre N, Maurice P, Paysant J, Theurel J, Claudon L, Kimmoun A, et al. The use of exoskeletons to help with prone positioning in the intensive care unit during COVID-19. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;63:379–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Chillura A, Bramanti A, Tartamella F, Pisano MF, Clemente E, Lo Scrudato M, et al. Advances in the rehabilitation of intensive care unit acquired weakness: A case report on the promising use of robotics and virtual reality coupled to physiotherapy. Medicine. 2020;99: e20939.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Huebner L, Schroeder I, Kraft E, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Klamt AC, et al. Early mobilization in the intensive care unit-Are robot-assisted systems the future? Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022;71:795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Peper KK, Aasmann A, Jensen ER, Haddadin S. Real-time-capable muscle force estimation for monitoring robotic rehabilitation therapy in the intensive care unit.

  148. Codinhoto R, Tzortzopoulos P, Kagioglou M, Aouad G, Cooper R. The impacts of the built environment on health outcomes. Facilities. 2009;27:138–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Huisman ERCM, Morales E, van Hoof J, Kort HSM. Healing environment: a review of the impact of physical environmental factors on users. Build Environ. 2012;58:70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Wenham T, Pittard A. Intensive care unit environment. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9:178–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Tronstad O, Flaws D, Lye I, Fraser JF, Patterson S. Doing time in an Australian ICU; the experience and environment from the perspective of patients and family members. Aust Crit Care. 2021;34:254–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Tronstad O, Flaws D, Lye I, Fraser JF, Patterson S. The intensive care unit environment from the perspective of medical, allied health and nursing clinicians: A qualitative study to inform design of the ‘ideal’ bedspace. Aust Crit Care. 2021;34:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Tronstad O, Flaws D, Patterson S, Holdsworth R, Fraser JF. Creating the ICU of the future: patient-centred design to optimise recovery. Crit Care. 2023;27:402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Piotrowicz E, Baranowski R, Bilinska M, Stepnowska M, Piotrowska M, Wójcik A, et al. A new model of home-based telemonitored cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure: effectiveness, quality of life, and adherence. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Hwang R, Bruning J, Morris NR, Mandrusiak A, Russell T. Home-based telerehabilitation is not inferior to a centre-based program in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017;63:101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Nelson M, Bourke M, Crossley K, Russell T. Telerehabilitation is non-inferior to usual care following total hip replacement - a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Physiotherapy. 2020;107:19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Muñoz-Tomás MT, Burillo-Lafuente M, Vicente-Parra A, Sanz-Rubio MC, Suarez-Serrano C, Marcén-Román Y, et al. Telerehabilitation as a therapeutic exercise tool versus face-to-face physiotherapy: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Uzzaman MN, Agarwal D, Chan SC, Patrick Engkasan J, Habib GMM, Hanafi NS, et al. Effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Puthucheary ZA, Gensichen JS, Cakiroglu AS, Cashmore R, Edbrooke L, Heintze C, et al. Implications for post critical illness trial design: sub-phenotyping trajectories of functional recovery among sepsis survivors. Crit Care. 2020;24:577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Fernández-Gonzalo S, Navarra-Ventura G, Bacardit N, Gomà Fernández G, de Haro C, Subirà C, et al. Cognitive phenotypes 1 month after ICU discharge in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2020;24:618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. Vicente AM, Ballensiefen W, Jönsson J-I. How personalised medicine will transform healthcare by 2030: the ICPerMed vision. J Transl Med. 2020;18:180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Ohbe H, Goto T, Nakamura K, Matsui H, Yasunaga H. Development and validation of early prediction models for new-onset functional impairment at hospital discharge of ICU admission. Intensive Care Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06688-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. Liu K, Shibata J, Fukuchi K, Takahashi K, Sonoo T, Ogura T, et al. Optimal timing of introducing mobilization therapy for ICU patients with sepsis. J Intensive Care. 2022;10:22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Ziegler A, Koch A, Krockenberger K, Grosshennig A. Personalized medicine using DNA biomarkers: a review. Hum Genet. 2012;131:1627–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. Sosnowski K, Lin F, Chaboyer W, Ranse K, Heffernan A, Mitchell M. The effect of the ABCDE/ABCDEF bundle on delirium, functional outcomes, and quality of life in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;138: 104410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Long JC, Sarkies MN, Francis-Auton E, Roberts N, Hardwick R, Nguyen HM, et al. Guiding principles for effective collaborative implementation strategies for multisite hospital improvement initiatives: a mixed-method realist evaluation of collaborative strategies used in four multisite initiatives at public hospitals in New South Wales. Australia BMJ Open. 2023;13: e070799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Modrykamien AM. The ICU follow-up clinic: a new paradigm for intensivists. Respir Care. 2012;57:764–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No specific funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: KL and OT. Statistical analysis, or interpretation of data: no statistical analysis was performed. Drafting the manuscript: KL, OT, DF, LC, AJ, KN, and JF. Critical review and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual insight: KL, OT, DF, LC, AJ, KN, and JF. Study supervision: KL, OT, and JF. Figures 1, 2 and 4 produced by AJ. Figure 3 produced by DF. All authors drafted the manuscript with relevant intellectual content, contributed to revision of the final version of the manuscript, approved the final version submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. KL and JF are the guarantors of the study. The corresponding author confirmed that all authors meet authorship criteria according to ICMJE.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keibun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval and consent of the patients are waived because of the paper nature.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests for the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, K., Tronstad, O., Flaws, D. et al. From bedside to recovery: exercise therapy for prevention of post-intensive care syndrome. j intensive care 12, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00724-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00724-4

Keywords