- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Landiolol reduces hemodynamic responses to bronchoscopy-assisted suctioning in intubated ICU patients
Journal of Intensive Care volume 2, Article number: 6 (2014)
Landiolol is an ultra-short-acting β1-selective antagonist developed in Japan that was recently approved for the treatment of tachycardia in intensive care units (ICUs). This study investigated the protective effects of landiolol against the cardiovascular responses during bronchoscopic endotracheal suctioning. This study enrolled 15 patients requiring orotracheal intubation in an ICU. All of the patients required endotracheal suctioning using fiber bronchoscopy while sedated at a Ramsay Scale of 2–3. All subsequent suctioning procedures were assigned randomly to three groups using a cross-over design: saline as a placebo (group C) or 20 or 40 μg kg-1 min-1 landiolol, respectively (groups L20 and L40). The infusion was started 3 min before bronchoscopy and continued for 6 min. The central venous pressure (CVP) heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (BP) were recorded. Fourteen patients completed the investigation, and 30 procedures (n = 10/group) were analyzed. The suctioning significantly increased the CVP, HR, and BP in groups C and L20, although the changes in BP were of shorter duration in group L20. No significant increase in the hemodynamic parameters was observed in group L40. The administration of landiolol 40 μg kg-1 min-1 prevented a harmful hyperdynamic circulatory response to bronchoscopic endotracheal suctioning, without obvious decreases in HR or BP after the intervention.
In patients with orotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation at intensive care unit, the supplemental administration of landiolol effectively diminished harmful hemodynamic changes during bronchoscopic endotracheal suctioning.
Landiolol is an ultra-short-acting, β1-selective adrenergic antagonist developed in Japan [1, 2]. The reported half-life is approximately 4 min. Recently, landiolol became available for controlling the heart rate in intensive care units (ICUs) in Japan . The results of a large, prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of controlling rapid heart rate were published as the J-Land Study .
Patients who have undergone tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation often require endotracheal suctioning to remove sputum and secretions from the lungs, and this stimulus induces unpleasant cardiovascular sympathetic responses . A rising heart rate increases the risk of myocardial ischemia . This study investigated the effects of short-term pre-administration of landiolol on the hemodynamic responses during endotracheal bronchoscopic suctioning in ICU patients.
A prospective double-blind control study using a cross-over design was conducted after obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (registration number 18–164, Ethics Committee of Medicine). All interventional procedures, including written informed consent from the participants, conformed to accepted study protocols.
The study enrolled 15 patients requiring orotracheal intubation for more than 96 h in the ICU. All patients were sedated to maintain their comfort using fentanyl, propofol, and dexmedetomidine, and intensivists usually tried to interrupt the sedatives each morning and restarted the administration of sedatives in the evening. The participants required endotracheal suctioning using a fiber bronchoscope while sedated at a Ramsay sedative score of 2–3 from the evening to the next morning. The drugs being administered were unchanged for 1 h before the bronchoscopic suctioning and maintained until the termination of the intervention. During the study period, the subsequent suctioning procedures were assigned to three regimens: saline as a placebo (group C) or 20 or 40 μg kg-1 min-1 landiolol (groups L20 and L40). The infusion was started 3 min before bronchoscopy and continued for 6 min. The heart rate (HR), invasive arterial blood pressure (BP), and central venous pressure (CVP) were recorded.
The patients' demographics and changes in cardiovascular parameters were compared among the groups using analysis of variance. A probability of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and the differences were subsequently analyzed using the Newman-Keuls post hoc multiple comparisons test.
Fourteen patients completed the investigation, and 30 procedures (n = 10/group) were analyzed. Only two patients received three regimens, and the others experienced two. The patients' demographic data and a study flow diagram are shown in Table 1. Throughout the study period, no adverse unexpected complication was observed.
Bronchoscopic suctioning significantly increased the CVP immediately after the event in all groups, and this increase lasted for up to 3 min after the stimulus (Figure 1). In groups C and L20, the HR and BP increased significantly immediately after suctioning. A few minutes after suctioning, the values of the cardiovascular parameters were lower in group L20 than in group C. In group L40, the HR and BP were significantly lower than those in group C throughout the period. There were no significant differences in the measured parameters among the three groups 20 min after suctioning.
Supplemental administration of landiolol reduced the cardiovascular responses to noxious stimuli of bronchoscopic suctioning. The larger dose of landiolol was more effective than the smaller dose. The increase in CVP immediately after suctioning was identical in all three groups; therefore, the effect of the noxious stimulus on the patients was considered comparable. Increasing intrathoracic or intra-abdominal pressure induced by physiological responses was observed in all patients.
The main effect of a β1-selective adrenergic antagonist on hemodynamic parameters is a decrease in heart rate. Nevertheless, this investigation showed that landiolol effectively reduced the increasing BP following a noxious stimulus. The larger dose (40 μg kg-1 min-1) completely abolished the hypertensive reaction. The major advantage of a β-blocker for controlled hypotension is the lack of both responsive tachycardia to the hypotension and responsive hypertension against bradycardia.
In this study, the administration of landiolol was effective in preventing tachycardia and hypertension without unfavorable circulatory depression after the termination of bronchoscopic suctioning. Even with the larger dose, all the measured parameters recovered within 20 min after the infusion. The ICU patients sometimes receive continuous infusions of vasopressors to maintain a normal HR and BP. Upon a sudden decrease in HR and BP, intensivists usually increase the rate of catecholamine infusion. However, frequent changes in the infusion require more intensive monitoring and human resources. Therefore, prolonged circulatory depression resulting from prophylaxis to the response to invasive stimuli might have more detrimental consequences.
The limitations of this study should be addressed. First, the participants were already receiving sedatives and analgesics, so we could not evaluate the precise effect of landiolol itself. Second, the results for each patient were consistent and comparable; however, the sample size was small. The adverse effect of landiolol should be appraised. Therefore, further studies are required. The study showed clinical advantages of landiolol for controlling hemodynamic changes against noxious stimuli.
JT is an intensivist and surgeon of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine. YUA worked in the Intensive Care Unit of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, from August 2005 to January 2010. SS is the concurrent Director of the Intensive Care Unit of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine. TE and AN are intensivist and ER physicians at the Nagoya University Hospital. NM is the chairman of the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine. NS is a chairman and director of the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.
Iguchi S, Iwamura H, Nishizaki M, Hayashi A, Senokuchi K, Kobayashi K, Sakaki K, Hachiya K, Ichioka Y, Kawamura M: Development of a highly cardioselective ultra short-acting beta-blocker, ONO-1101. Chem Pharm Bull 1992, 40: 1462-1469. 10.1248/cpb.40.1462
Muraki K, Nakagawa H, Nagano N, Henmi S, Kawasumi H, Nakanishi T, Imaizumi K, Tokuno T, Atsuki K, Imaizumi Y, Watanabe M: Effects of ONO-1101, a novel beta-antagonist, on action potential and membrane currents in cardiac muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996, 278: 555-563.
Yoshida Y, Terajima K, Sato C, Akada S, Miyagi Y, Hongo T, Takeda S, Tanaka K, Sakamoto A: Clinical role and efficacy of landiolol in the intensive care unit. J Anesth 2008, 22: 64-69. 10.1007/s00540-007-0573-3
Nagai R, Kinugawa K, Inoue H, Atarashi H, Seino Y, Yamashita T, Shimizu W, Aiba T, Kitakaze M, Sakamoto A, Ikeda T, Imai Y, Daimon T, Fujino K, Nagano T, Okamura T, Hori M, J-Land Investigators: Urgent management of rapid heart rate in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison of the ultra-short-acting β1-selective blocker landiolol with digoxin (J-Land Study). Circ J 2013, 77: 908-916. 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-1618
Jongerden IP, Kesecioglu J, Speelberg B, Buiting AG, Leverstein-van Hall MA, Bonten MJ: Changes in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation after open and closed endotracheal suctioning: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care 2012, 27: 647-654. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.02.016
Paulissian R, Salem MR, Joseph NJ, Braverman B, Cohen HC, Crystal GJ, Heyman HJ: Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 1991, 73: 10-15.
All authors have no conflict of interest for the current investigation. The part of results was presented in the 37th Critical Care Congress of Society of Critical Care Medicine, in 2008 at Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. The presentations of the results including the current manuscript were accordance with the study protocol approved by Institutional Review Board, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine. The investigational data sets have no connections to the participants by unidentified recording procedures in the institute.
JT is an investigator of the study as a surgeon and intensivist. YUA is the principal investigator of the study, receiving the approval from IRB as a principal responsible physician, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. TE and AN are investigators of the study and helped in revising the manuscript. NM supervised the whole study as a Chairman. SS also supervised the study and acted as a co-responsible staff of the study. NS as well supervised and conducted the study, providing the aid for investigators in obtaining informed consent with post-surgical patients as an intensivist. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.