Skip to main content

Update in acute respiratory distress syndrome


Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by permeability pulmonary edema and refractory hypoxemia. Recently, the new definition of ARDS has been published, and this definition suggested severity-oriented respiratory treatment by introducing three levels of severity according to PaO2/FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure. Lung-protective ventilation is still the key of better outcome in ARDS. Through randomized trials, short-term use of neuromuscular blockade at initial stage of mechanical ventilation, prone ventilation in severe ARDS, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in ARDS with influenza pneumonia showed beneficial efficacy. However, ARDS mortality still remains high. Therefore, early recognition of ARDS modified risk factors and the avoidance of aggravating factors during the patient's hospital stay can help decrease its development. In addition, efficient antifibrotic strategies in late-stage ARDS should be developed to improve the outcome.


Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a permeability pulmonary edema characterized by increased permeability of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells and alveolar epithelial cells, leading to hypoxemia that is refractory to usual oxygen therapy. In a national study in Iceland, the incidence of ARDS almost doubled, but hospital mortality decreased during the 23 years of observation [1]. In a prospective study in Spain, despite use of lung-protective ventilation, overall ICU and hospital mortality of ARDS patients is still higher than 40% [2]. The aim of this review is to provide an update on ARDS.


The evolution of the definition of ARDS

The first definition of ARDS dates to Ashbaugh and colleagues in 1967 [3], followed by the American-European Consensus Conference's definition in 1994. The American-European Consensus Conference's definition in 1994, which has been challenged over the years in several studies since the assessment of oxygenation defect, does not require standardized ventilatory support [4]. Recently, a new consensus definition of ARDS, the Berlin definition, has been published [5]. The new definition of ARDS maintains a link to the 1994 definition with diagnostic criteria of timing, chest imaging, origin of edema, and hypoxemia. According to the revised definition of ARDS, a minimum level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and mutually exclusive PaO2/FiO2 thresholds was chosen to differentiate between three levels of severity (mild, moderate, and severe) of ARDS. The revised definition appears to have improved predictive validity for mortality of its spectrum of severity [5]. The revised definition presents a severity-oriented method for respiratory management of ARDS [6]. Histopathological findings have been correlated to severity and duration of ARDS [7]. Using clinical criteria, the revised definition for ARDS allowed for the identification of severe ARDS of more than 72 h as a homogeneous group of patients characterized by a high proportion of diffuse alveolar damage [7].

Pathogenesis of ARDS

In addition to the classical views of ARDS including the role of cellular and humoral mediators, the role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been highlighted. The RAS is thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of ARDS by increasing vascular permeability. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a key enzyme of the RAS that converts inactive angiotensin I to the vasoactive and aldosterone-stimulating peptide angiotensin II and also metabolizes kinins along with many other biologically active peptides. ACE is found in varying levels on the surface of lung epithelial and endothelial cells [8]. Angiotensin II induces apoptosis of lung epithelial and endothelial cells and is a potent fibrogenic factor [9]. Based on these biological properties of ACE, there is considerable interest in its potential involvement in acute lung injury (ALI)/ARDS [10, 11].

Cor pulmonale in ARDS

Since the first publication demonstrating the presence of pulmonary hypertension and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with severe acute respiratory failure [12], the development of acute cor pulmonale in ARDS has been considered a poor prognostic factor. In two recent prospective observational studies, cor pulmonale occurrence was not negligible (up to one fourth) in ARDS patients ventilated with airway pressure limitations, was associated with sepsis, and was a risk factor for 28-day mortality [13, 14]. Considering these findings together with the association of high PEEP levels and elevated plateau pressure with pulmonary artery pressure [15], careful monitoring of acute cor pulmonale is recommended in ARDS.

Diagnosis and early intervention

Differential diagnosis between cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) and ARDS is sometimes not easy. The accuracy of the portable chest radiograph to detect pulmonary abnormalities consistent with ARDS is significantly limited [16]. In a study using chest computed tomography, upper-lobe-predominant ground-glass attenuation, central-predominant ground-glass attenuation, and central airspace consolidation were associated with high positive predictive values (95.2%, 92.3%, and 92.0%, respectively) and moderate negative predictive values (47.5%, 51.4%, and 50.0%, respectively) to diagnose CPE [17]. Measurement of the extravascular lung water index and the pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI) [18] using a transpulmonary thermodilution method seemed to be a useful quantitative diagnostic tool for ARDS in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and radiologic infiltrates. In one study, A PVPI value of 2.6–2.85 provided a definitive diagnosis of ALI/ARDS (specificity, 0.90–0.95), and a value <1.7 ruled out an ALI/ARDS diagnosis (specificity, 0.95) [18].

Clinical trials of anti-inflammatory therapy

Although ARDS is an acute lung inflammation in which diverse inflammatory cells and mediators are involved, multiple anti-inflammatory interventions have not shown improved survival. Clinical trials using corticosteroids, prostaglandins, nitric oxide, prostacyclin, surfactant, lisofylline, ketoconazole, N-acetylcysteine, and fish oil have been unable to show a statistically significant improvement in patient mortality. The use of corticosteroids to attenuate inflammation remains controversial. Moreover, the ARDSnet study of steroid treatment [19] revealed that administration after 14 days of disease onset could be harmful. Up to now, the efficacy of low-dose corticosteroids [20] for the alleviation of inflammation, to reduce organ dysfunction and to improve survival, especially in sepsis associated ARDS, has not been fully elucidated.

Mechanical ventilation

Numerous lines of evidence have demonstrated that inappropriate mechanical ventilatory settings can produce further lung damage to patients with ARDS. Ventilator-induced lung injury seems to be attributed to end-inspiratory overdistension and a low end-expiratory lung volume, allowing repeated collapse and re-expansion with each respiratory cycle (tidal recruitment). Tidal recruitment results in high shear force on alveolar walls and small airways during inflation, especially at the interfaces between collapsed and aerated alveoli. Therefore, low tidal volume (6 mL/kg of predicted body weight), limitation of plateau pressure (less than 28–30 cm H2O), and appropriate PEEP is a key component of a lung-protective ventilatory strategy (LPVS) [21]. Since then, the lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategy has been the standard practice for the management of ARDS. In a retrospective observational study of 104 patients with ARDS caused by pandemic influenza A/H1N1 infection admitted to 28 ICUs in South Korea, low-tidal volume (TV) mechanical ventilation still benefited patients with ARDS caused by viral pneumonia. Patients with TV less than or equal to 7 mL/kg required ventilation, ICU admission, and hospitalization for fewer days than those with TV greater than 7 mL/kg (11.4 vs. 6.1 days for 28-day ventilator-free days, 9.7 vs. 4.9 days for 28-day ICU-free days, and 5.2 vs. 2.4 days for 28-day hospital-free days, respectively). A tidal volume greater than 9 mL/kg (hazard ratio, 2.459; P = 0.003) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (hazard rate, 1.158; P = 0.014) were significant predictors of 28-day ICU mortality [22].

The lung-protective ventilation strategy is both safe and potentially beneficial in patients who do not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. In mechanically ventilated patients without ARDS at the time of endotracheal intubation, the majority of data favors lower tidal volume to reduce progression to ARDS [23]. Septic patients without ARDS who were ventilated with a protective strategy using a plateau pressure <30 cmH2O showed better outcomes and a lower incidence of ARDS than those ventilated without this limit on plateau pressure [24]. A recent meta-analysis also showed that protective ventilation with low tidal volumes was associated better clinical outcomes even in patients without ARDS [25]. The use of very low TV combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal has the potential to further reduce ventilator-associated lung injury. Whether this strategy will improve survival in ARDS patients remains to be determined [26].

To select the optimal PEEP level to prevent the undesirable tidal recruitment together with the minimization of alveolar overdistension is not easy. Traditionally, the level of PEEP has been set according to the required level of FiO2. Simple elevation of the PEEP level which is more than that of the ARDSnet clinical trial group of low TV was shown to not improve clinical outcome [27]. Another way to set the PEEP level is to employ a decremental PEEP trial after alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM). An ARM has the advantage of standardizing the history of lung volume and to let the lung remain more open at the end of expiration. However, the application of early ARM with low tidal volume has not been proved efficacious for the reduction of mortality [28, 29]. The PEEP level could be set according to a level of transpulmonary pressure during expiration. One study demonstrated the efficacy of esophageal pressure-guided PEEP on the improvement of oxygenation and lung compliance in ALI [30]. The researchers set the PEEP at a level to guarantee that transpulmonary pressure during end-expiratory occlusion would stay between 0 and 10 cm H2O as well as keep transpulmonary pressure during end-inspiratory occlusion at less than 25 cm H2O [30]. A problem with setting the PEEP according to the transpulmonary pressure is the technical difficulty in achieving accurate esophageal pressure using an esophageal balloon catheter [31]. Recently, electrical impedance tomography has been introduced as a true bedside technique, which provides information on regional ventilation distribution [32].

Prone ventilation

Prone position reduces the transpulmonary pressure gradient, recruiting collapsed regions of the lung without increasing airway pressure or hyperinflation. Prone ventilation showed improved oxygenation and improved outcomes in severe hypoxemic patients with ARDS [33]. Prone ventilation was more effective in obese patients with ARDS than in non-obese ARDS patients [34]. In a study investigating whether there is any interdependence between the effects of PEEP and prone positioning, prone positioning further decreased non-aerated tissue (322 ± 132 to 290 ± 141 g, P = 0.028) and reduced tidal hyperinflation observed at PEEP 15 in the supine position (0.57% ± 0.30% to 0.41% ± 0.22%) [35]. Cyclic recruitment/de-recruitment only decreased when high PEEP and prone positioning were applied together (4.1% ± 1.9% to 2.9% ± 0.9%, P = 0.003), especially in patients with high lung recruitability [35]. These results showed that prone ventilation decreases alveolar instability and hyperinflation observed at high PEEP in ARDS patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for ARDS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a therapy that has been used in severe cases of ARDS when patients fail to improve with traditional management. Major technological improvements in ECMO machines and the positive results of the conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR) trial [36] have reignited interest in veno-venous ECMO in patients with severe ARDS. Recent literature shows varying mortality rates for the use of ECMO for ARDS. Although transfer of patients to an ECMO center for treatment using specific criteria and indications may improve outcomes, credible evidence supporting a mortality benefit of ECMO is lacking. Further research is needed regarding the timing of the initiation of ECMO, the standardization of therapy and monitoring, and understanding which type of ECMO reduces morbidity and mortality rates in patients with ARDS.

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) seems ideal for lung protection in acute respiratory distress syndrome. HFOV was effective in improving oxygenation in adults with ARDS, particularly when instituted early [37]. Changes in PaO2/FiO2 during the first 3 h of HFOV helped identify patients that are more likely to survive [37] and showed a promising outcome compared with ARDS patients without current LPVS [38]. In adults with moderate-to-severe ARDS, early application of HFOV compared with an employment of a ventilation strategy of low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure, does not reduce, and may increase, in-hospital mortality [39].

Neuromuscular blockade and sedation

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are commonly used in ARDS, but the benefits and the risks of using these agents are controversial. In a recent randomized trial [40], the use of NMBAs in ARDS patients showed a beneficial outcome. In addition, short-term infusion of cisatracurium besylate reduced hospital mortality and barotrauma and did not appear to increase ICU-acquired weakness for critically ill adults with ARDS [40]. The use of alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (e.g., dexmedetomidine) could be used in a non-invasive positive pressure ventilation trial in a select group of ARDS patients, as this class of drugs preserve respiratory drive [41], lower oxygen consumption, and pulmonary hypertension and increase diuresis.

Fluid management and a bronchodilator use

Because vascular and epithelial permeability is increased in ARDS, fluid management is one of the most difficult measures to manage in septic shock patients with ARDS. A conservative fluid management strategy maintaining a relatively low central venous pressure is associated with the need for fewer days of mechanical ventilation compared with a liberal fluid management strategy in ARDS [42]. However, conservative fluid management is highly recommended after hemodynamic stabilization in ARDS patients. In hemodynamically unstable patients, dynamic monitoring of lung fluid balance needs to be implemented to guide the administration of fluids in ARDS patients [43]. Despite a putative beneficial role in the resolution of alveolar edema seen in preliminary studies, recent evidence has indicated significant detrimental effects associated with beta-2 agonist use in ARDS patients [44].

Experimental trials

In experimental models of ARDS mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), transplantation improved the regeneration of lung tissue [45, 46]. The benefits of these MSCs are derived not only from the incorporation of these cells in the damaged lung, but also from their interaction with damaged lung cells and immunologic modulation [47]. MSCs can also control oxidative stress, transfer functional mitochondria to the damaged cells, and control bacterial infection by secreting antibacterial peptides [48]. Most of these studies administered MSCs as a pretreatment, and the use of MSCs is still highly experimental as a treatment or prevention strategy of ARDS.

Prognosis and quality of life of survivors from ARDS

In a meta-analysis, an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the ACE gene was not associated with susceptibility to ALI/ARDS for any genetic model. However, the ACE I/D polymorphism was associated with an increased mortality risk of ALI/ARDS in Asian subjects [49]. After correcting for multiple comparisons, this finding remained significant, and it was shown that the genotype of the I/D polymorphism in ACE may be a predictor of ALI/ARDS mortality in Asian populations [49].

Along with high mortality risks, survivors suffer significant decrements in their quality of life [50]. In survivors of acute lung injury, there was no difference in physical function, survival, or multiple secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months follow-up after initial trophic or full enteral feeding [51].


Currently, in spite of the remarkable advancements in the understanding of its pathogenesis, the only effective therapeutic measure to decrease mortality is low-tidal volume mechanical ventilation and prone ventilation for severe ARDS cases. In extreme, life-threatening cases, ECMO seems to serve as a bridge to recovery and enables lung-protective ventilation. Most ARDS patients die of multi-organ failure rather than irreversible respiratory failure, indicating that ARDS is closely associated with other organs by neurological, biochemical, metabolic, and inflammatory reactions. Moreover, the lungs may play an important role in the development of non-pulmonary organ failure in ARDS. Thus, early recognition of ARDS modified risk factors and the avoidance of aggravating factors during the patient's hospital stay (e.g., non-protective mechanical ventilation, multiple blood product transfusions, positive fluid balance, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and gastric aspiration) can help decrease its incidence. In addition, efficient antifibrotic strategies are still lacking for patients with late-stage ARDS. Therefore, new therapies that address the underlying pathophysiology are needed to reduce the mortality of patients with ARDS.


  1. 1.

    Sigurdsson MI, Sigvaldason K, Gunnarsson TS, Moller A, Sigurdsson GH: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: nationwide changes in incidence, treatment and mortality over 23 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013, 57: 37-45. 10.1111/aas.12001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Villar J, Blanco J, Anon JM, Santos-Bouza A, Blanch L, Ambrós A, Gandía F, Carriedo D, Mosteiro F, Basaldúa S, Fernández RL, Kacmarek RM, ALIEN Network: The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37: 1932-1941. 10.1007/s00134-011-2380-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, Levine BE: Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet. 1967, 2: 319-323.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Villar J, Kacmarek RM: The American-European consensus conference definition of the acute respiratory distress syndrome is dead, long live positive end-expiratory pressure!. Med Intensiva. 2012, 36: 571-575. 10.1016/j.medin.2012.08.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Definition Task Force ARDS, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012, 307: 2526-2533.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, Antonelli M, Anzueto A, Beale R, Brochard L, Brower R, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, Rhodes A, Slutsky AS, Vincent JL, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ranieri VM: The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med. 2012, 38: 1573-1582. 10.1007/s00134-012-2682-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Thille AW, Esteban A, Fernandez-Segoviano P, Rodriguez JM, Aramburu JA, Peñuelas O, Cortés-Puch I, Cardinal-Fernández P, Lorente JA, Frutos-Vivar F: Comparison of the Berlin definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome with autopsy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 187: 761-767. 10.1164/rccm.201211-1981OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Igic R, Behnia R: Properties and distribution of angiotensin I converting enzyme. Curr Pharm Des. 2003, 9: 697-706. 10.2174/1381612033455459.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang R, Alam G, Zagariya A, Gidea C, Pinillos H, Lalude O, Choudhary G, Oezatalay D, Uhal BD: Apoptosis of lung epithelial cells in response to TNF-alpha requires angiotensin II generation de novo. J Cell Physiol. 2000, 185: 253-259. 10.1002/1097-4652(200011)185:2<253::AID-JCP10>3.0.CO;2-#.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, Crackower MA, Fukamizu A, Hui CC, Hein L, Uhlig S, Slutsky AS, Jiang C, Penninger JM: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005, 436: 112-116. 10.1038/nature03712.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lambert DW, Clarke NE, Turner AJ: Not just angiotensinases: new roles for the angiotensin-converting enzymes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010, 67: 89-98. 10.1007/s00018-009-0152-x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zapol WM, Snider MT: Pulmonary hypertension in severe acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 1977, 296: 476-480. 10.1056/NEJM197703032960903.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Boissier F, Katsahian S, Razazi K, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Leon R, Vivier E, Brochard L, Vieillard-Baron A, Brun-Buisson C, MekontsoDessap A: Prevalence and prognosis of cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39: 1725-1733. 10.1007/s00134-013-2941-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lheritier G, Legras A, Caille A, Lherm T, Mathonnet A, Frat JP, Courte A, Martin-Lefèvre L, Gouëllo JP, Amiel JB, Garot D, Vignon P: Prevalence and prognostic value of acute cor pulmonale and patent foramen ovale in ventilated patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39: 1734-1742. 10.1007/s00134-013-3017-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Repesse X, Charron C, Vieillard-Baron A: Right ventricular failure in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012, 78: 941-948.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Figueroa-Casas JB, Brunner N, Dwivedi AK, Ayyappan AP: Accuracy of the chest radiograph to identify bilateral pulmonary infiltrates consistent with the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome using computed tomography as reference standard. J Crit Care. 2013, 28: 352-357. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Komiya K, Ishii H, Murakami J, Yamamoto H, Okada F, Satoh K, Takahashi O, Tobino K, Ichikado K, Johkoh T, Kadota J: Comparison of chest computed tomography features in the acute phase of cardiogenic pulmonary edema and acute respiratory distress syndrome on arrival at the emergency department. J Thorac Imaging. 2013, 28: 322-328. 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31828d40b2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kushimoto S, Taira Y, Kitazawa Y, Okuchi K, Sakamoto T, Ishikura H, Endo T, Yamanouchi S, Tagami T, Yamaguchi J, Yoshikawa K, Sugita M, Kase Y, Kanemura T, Takahashi H, Kuroki Y, Izumino H, Rinka H, Seo R, Takatori M, Kaneko T, Nakamura T, Irahara T, Saito N, Watanabe A, The PiCCO Pulmonary Edema Study: The clinical usefulness of extravascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability index to diagnose and characterize pulmonary edema: a prospective multicenter study on the quantitative differential diagnostic definition for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2012, 16: R232-10.1186/cc11898.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman RB, Hough CL, Lanken PN, Hyzy R, Thompson BT, Ancukiewicz M, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network: Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 1671-1684.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Meduri GU, Headley AS, Golden E, Carson SJ, Umberger RA, Kelso T, Tolley EA: Effect of prolonged methylprednisolone therapy in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998, 280: 159-165. 10.1001/jama.280.2.159.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 1301-1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Oh DK, Lee MG, Choi EY, Lim J, Lee HK, Kim SC, Lim CM, Koh Y, Hong SB, Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine H1N1 collaborative: Low-tidal volume mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by pandemic influenza A/H1N1 infection. J Crit Care. 2013, 28: 358-364. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fuller BM, Mohr NM, Drewry AM, Carpenter CR: Lower tidal volume at initiation of mechanical ventilation may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2013, 17: R11-10.1186/cc11936.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Martin-Loeches I, de Haro C, Dellinger RP, Ferrer R, Phillips GS, Levy MM, Artigas A: Effectiveness of an inspiratory pressure-limited approach to mechanical ventilation in septic patients. Eur Respir J. 2013, 41: 157-164. 10.1183/09031936.00221611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Neto AS, Pereira VG, Esposito DC, Damasceno MC, Schultz MJ: Neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a summary of the current evidence from three randomized controlled trials. Ann Intensive Care. 2012, 2: 33-10.1186/2110-5820-2-33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Goldmann A, Müller T, Staudinger T, Brederlau J, Muellenbach R, Dembinski R, Graf BM, Wewalka M, Philipp A, Wernecke KD, Lubnow M, Slutsky AS: Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional’ protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS : the prospective randomized Xtravent-study. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39: 847-856. 10.1007/s00134-012-2787-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, Matthay MA, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network: Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 327-336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Huh JW, Jung H, Choi HS, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y: Efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure titration after the alveolar recruitment manoeuvre in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2009, 13: R22-10.1186/cc7725.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Slutsky AS, Arabi YM, Cooper DJ, Davies AR, Hand LE, Zhou Q, Thabane L, Austin P, Lapinsky S, Baxter A, Russell J, Skrobik Y, Ronco JJ, Stewart TE, Lung Open Ventilation Study Investigators: Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008, 299: 637-645. 10.1001/jama.299.6.637.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH: Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 2095-2104. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Benditt JO: Esophageal and gastric pressure measurements. Respir Care. 2005, 50: 68-75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Moerer O, Hahn G, Quintel M: Lung impedance measurements to monitor alveolar ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011, 17: 260-267. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283463c9c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L, PROSEVA Study Group: Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013, 368: 2159-2168. 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    De Jong A, Molinari N, Sebbane M, Prades A, Futier E, Jung B, Chanques G, Jaber S: Feasibility and effectiveness of prone position in morbidly obese ARDS patients: a case–control clinical study. Chest. 2013, 163: 1554-1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cornejo RA, Diaz JC, Tobar EA, Bruhn AR, Ramos CA, González RA, Repetto CA, Romero CM, Gálvez LR, Llanos O, Arellano DH, Neira WR, Díaz GA, Zamorano AJ, Pereira GL: Effects of prone positioning on lung protection in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 188: 440-448. 10.1164/rccm.201207-1279OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, Hibbert CL, Truesdale A, Clemens F, Cooper N, Firmin RK, Elbourne D, CESAR trial collaboration: Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009, 374: 1351-1363. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61069-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Camporota L, Sherry T, Smith J, Lei K, McLuckie A, Richard B: Physiological predictors of survival during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2013, 17: R40-10.1186/cc12550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sud S, Sud M, Friedrich JO, Wunsch H, Meade MO, Ferguson ND, Adhikari NK: High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, 2: CD004085

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Mehta S, Hand L, Austin P, Zhou Q, Matte A, Walter SD, Lamontagne F, Granton JT, Arabi YM, Arroliga AC, Stewart TE, Slutsky AS, Meade MO, OSCILLATE Trial Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013, 368: 795-805. 10.1056/NEJMoa1215554.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Alhazzani W, Alshahrani M, Jaeschke R, Forel JM, Papazian L, Sevransky J, O Meade M: Neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2013, 17: R43-10.1186/cc12557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG, SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group: Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009, 301: 489-499. 10.1001/jama.2009.56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Schoenfeld D, Wiedemann HP, de Boisblanc B, Connors AF, Hite RD, Harabin AL, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network: Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 2213-2224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Huh JW, Koh Y: Ventilation parameters used to guide cardiopulmonary function during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013, 19: 215-220. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283609288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gao Smith F, Perkins GD, Gates S, Young D, McAuley DF, Tunnicliffe W, Khan Z, Lamb SE, BALTI-2 study investigators: Effect of intravenous β-2 agonist treatment on clinical outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (BALTI-2): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012, 379: 229-235. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61623-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Curley GF, Hayes M, Ansari B, Shaw G, Ryan A, Barry F, O'Brien T, O'Toole D, Laffey JG: Mesenchymal stem cells enhance recovery and repair following ventilator-induced lung injury in the rat. Thorax. 2012, 67: 496-501. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chimenti L, Luque T, Bonsignore MR, Ramirez J, Navajas D, Farre R: Pre-treatment with mesenchymal stem cells reduces ventilator-induced lung injury. Eur Respir J. 2012, 40: 939-948. 10.1183/09031936.00153211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gotts JE, Matthay MA: Mesenchymal stem cells and acute lung injury. Crit Care Clin. 2011, 27: 719-733. 10.1016/j.ccc.2011.04.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cardenes N, Caceres E, Romagnoli M, Rojas M: Mesenchymal stem cells: a promising therapy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiration. 2013, 85: 267-278. 10.1159/000347072.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Matsuda A, Kishi T, Jacob A, Aziz M, Wang P: Association between insertion/deletion polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Genet. 2012, 13: 76-10.1186/1471-2350-13-76.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 683-693. 10.1056/NEJMoa022450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Needham DM, Dinglas VD, Bienvenu OJ, Colantuoni E, Wozniak AW, Rice TW, Hopkins RO, NIH NHLBIARDS Network: One year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial. BMJ. 2013, 346: f1532-10.1136/bmj.f1532.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Younsuck Koh.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interest.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koh, Y. Update in acute respiratory distress syndrome. j intensive care 2, 2 (2014).

Download citation


  • ARDS
  • The Berlin definition
  • Treatment
  • Prone
  • ECMO
  • Review