Skip to main content

Table 1 PICS assessment instruments

From: Post-intensive care syndrome follow-up system after hospital discharge: a narrative review

Assessment instruments

Items

Score range

Methods

Interview style

Frequency useda

Features

Physical functions

 6-min walk test (6MWT)

1

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

49

The value depends on age, sex, body weight, and height

 2-min walk test (2MWT)

1

 ≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

3

Short version of 6MWT. The results of 2MWT correlate with those of 6MWT

 Medical Research Council score (MRC score)

12

0–60

Interview

Face-to-face

34

Sum of the score of muscle strength by manual muscle strength (0–5) at 12 points

 Grip strength

1

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

34

Testing requires a grip dynamometer

 Timed Up-and-Go (TUG)

1

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

5

Simple evaluation of mobility that measures how long it takes to stand up, walk a distance of 3 m, walk back, and sit down again

 Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

3

0–12

Interview

Face-to-face

14

Evaluation of balance, walking, and sit-to-stand

 30-s sit-to-stand (30STS)

1

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

15

Evaluation of lower extremity strength that measures the number of times a patient fully stands up from and sits down a chair without arm muscles in 30 s

 Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS)

1

1–9 (ordinal)

Interview

Face-to-face/Telephone

16

Evaluation of the degree of disability from frailty

Cognitive functions

 Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

8

0–30

Interview

Face-to-face/Telephone

37

Evaluation of visuospatial/executive, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. Telephone MoCA (T-MoCA) omits items about visuospatial/executive and naming

 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

11

0–30

Interview

Face-to-face/Telephone

36

Evaluation of registration, attention, calculation, recall, language, ability to follow simple commands, and orientation. Several modified versions of MMSE are available for evaluation via telephone

 Short Memory Questionnaire (SMQ)

14

4–46

Self-report

–

7

Evaluation of short-term memory, remote memory, cognition, orientation, and calculation. SMQ may also be evaluated by family caregivers

 Mini-Cog

2

0–5

Interview

Face-to-face

1

Simple screening by the 3-item recall test and clock drawing test

 Animal Naming

1

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face/Telephone

0

Simple screening by naming as many animals as possible within one minute

 Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)

12 (subtests)

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

21

License fee required. Evaluation of immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional, attention, language, and delayed memory. It takes 30–45 min. RBANS has a mean (standard deviation) population age-adjusted score of 100 ± 15

 Trail-Making Test A and B (TMT A and B)

2 (subtests)

≥ 0

Interview

Face-to-face

15

Evaluation of working memory, visual processing, visuospatial skills, selective and divided attention, processing speed, and psychomotor coordination. Measuring how long it takes to draw a line from the first circle to the 25th circle in a fixed order in each part

Mental health

 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

14

0–21

Self-report

–

155

Anxiety/depression

 Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)

22

0–4 (average)

Self-report

–

76

PTSD

 Impact of Event Scale 6 (IES-6)

6

0–4 (average)

Self-report

–

8

Short version of IES-R

 Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)

4

0–12

Self-report

–

3

Screening for anxiety and depression

 Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

9

0–27

Self-report

–

26

Depression. PHQ-8 is also available that omits one item on suicidal ideation from PHQ-9

 Generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7)

7

0–28

Self-report

–

13

Anxiety

Activities of daily living (ADL)

 Barthel Index

10

0–100

Self-report

–

47

Basic ADL including feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowels, bladder, toilet, transfer, mobility, and stairs. The Barthel Index may also be evaluated by family caregivers

 Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

8

0–8

Self-report

–

25

Instrumental ADL including telephone, shopping, preparing food, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, medication, and finance. IADL may also be evaluated by family caregivers

 Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

13

13–91

Interview

Face-to-face/Telephone

12

Evaluating not only basic ADL, but also communication and social problems. FIM may also be evaluated by family caregivers

Quality of life (QOL)

 Short Form-36 (SF-36)

36

0–100

Self-report

–

153

Usage fee required. SF-36 includes eight domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health) and two component scores (physical component score [PCS] and mental component score]). The PCS score may be used for the assessment of physical problems. SF-36 may also be evaluated by family caregivers

 European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level, 3 Level, Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-5L, 3L, VAS)

5

0–1

Self-report

–

155

Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression components included. Components of mobility, self-care, and usual activities may be used for the screening of physical problems. The component of pain/discomfort may be used for the screening of pain. EQ-5D may also be evaluated by family caregivers using the proxy version

 Short Form-12 (SF-12)

12

0–100

Self-report

–

26

Short form of SF-36, which also includes eight domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health) and two component scores (physical component score [PCS] and mental component score]). Usage fee required. SF-12 may also be evaluated by family caregivers

 12-item World Health Organization’s Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)

12

0–48

Self-report

 

11

Evaluation of disability about mobility, self-care, life activities, and participation. WHODAS 2.0 may also be evaluated by family caregivers

Nutritional status

 Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria

(GLIM criteria)

3 (phenotype)

2 (etiology)

None

Moderate

Severe (malnutrition)

Interview

Face-to-face

–

Assessment to diagnose malnutrition among patients at risk. Phenotypic criteria include weight loss, a low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass. Etiological criteria include reduced food intake or assimilation and inflammation. To diagnose malnutrition, at least 1 phenotypic criterion and 1 etiological criterion need to be present. The severity of malnutrition is classified as moderate and severe

 Body composition

–

–

Interview

Face-to-face

–

Evaluation of body composition including muscle mass by validated methods (e.g., dual-energy absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance, ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging)

Sleep

 Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

19

0–21

Self-report

–

9

Sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbance, medication, and daytime sleep dysfunction

Pain

 Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)

4 (severity)

7 (interference)

1–10

Self-report

–

13

Including two main scores: the pain severity score and pain interference score. BPI short form and long form are both available

Family

 SF-36

36

0–100

Self-report

–

47

QOL

 HADS

14

0–14

Self-report

–

34

Anxiety/depression

 IES-R

22

0–4 (average)

Self-report

–

19

PTSD

  1. aWe showed the frequency of articles on PICS conducted between 2014 and 2022, indicating the usage of each instrument [35]