Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotics intravenous infusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials

No.

First author, year

Country

Design

Double blinding

Number of study participants, total (P vs I)

Age, P vs I, median

APACHEII, P vs I, median

Sepsis definition or type of infection

Organism

Antibiotics

Prolonged infusion

Intermittent infusion

1

Angus, 2000

Thailand

RCT

NR

21 (10 vs 11)

43 vs 48

21 vs 15

Septic melioidosis

Only Gram-negative

β-Lactam (unknown in detail)

12 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 4 mg/kg/h by constant rate infusion

40 mg/kg every 8 h, intermittent bolus injection

2

Nicolau, 2001

USA

RCT

No

35 (17 vs 18)

46 vs 56 (mean)

13.9 vs 15.5 (mean)

Nosocomial pneumonia

Mostly Gram-negative

β-Lactam (ceftazidime) plus tobramycin

Ceftazidime, 3 g/day, continuously; tobramycin, 7 mg/kg/day

Ceftazidime: 2 g, over 30 min, every 8 h; tobramycin, 7 mg/kg/day

3

Georges, 2005

France

RCT

No

50 (26 vs 24)

50 vs 46 (mean)

a45 vs 44 (aSAPS II, median)

Nosocomial pneumonia or bacteremia

Mostly Gram-negative

β-Lactam (cefepime) plus amikacin

Cefepime, 4 g/day, continuously; amikacin, 20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 15 mg/kg/day

Cefepime, 2 g, over 30 min, twice daily; amikacin: 20 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 15 mg/kg/day

4

Rafati, 2006

Iran

RCT

NR

40 (20 vs 20)

50.1 vs 48.0 (mean)

16.4 vs 14.2 (mean)

Septic patients with SIRS (Sepsis-2)

Only Gram-negative

β-Lactam (piperacillin) plus amikacin

Piperacillin, 2 g loading dose, followed by 8 g/day, continuously; amikacin, 15 mg/kg/day

Piperacillin, 3 g, over 30 min, every 6 h; amikacin, 15 mg/kg/day

5

Lau, 2006

USA

RCT

No

258 (128 vs 130)

51.5 vs 48.0

7 vs 7

Complicated intra-abdominal infections

Gram-negative and Gram-positive

β-Lactam (piperacillin–tazobactam)

2.25 g loading dose, followed by 13.5 g/day, continuously

3.375 g, over 30 min, every 6 h

6

Roberts, 2007

Australia

RCT

No

57 (29 vs 28)

41 vs 56

20 vs 17

Sepsis (SIRS criteria)

Mixed

β-Lactam (ceftriaxone)

Continuous infusion, 2 g/day

Intermittent bolus, 2 g every 24 h

7

Roberts and Kirkpatrick, 2009

Australia

RCT

No

10 (5 vs 5)

57 vs 55

a5 vs 3 (aSOFA, median)

Sepsis (SIRS criteria)

Only Gram-negative

β-Lactam (meropenem)

Continuous infusion, 3 g/day

Intermittent bolus, 1 g every 8 h

8

Chytra, 2012

Czech Republic

RCT

No

214 (106 vs 108)

44.9 vs 47.2 (mean)

21.4 vs 22.1 (mean)

Sepsis (Sepsis-2)

Mostly Gram-negative

β-Lactam (meropenem)

Continuous infusion, loading dose 2 g; 4 g every 24 h

30 min; 2 g every 8 h

9

Dulhunty, 2013

Australia, Hong Kong

RCT

Yes

60 (30 vs 30)

54 vs 60 (mean)

21 vs 23 (mean)

Severe sepsis (Sepsis-2)

Mixed

β-Lactam (piperacillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, or meropenem)

Continuous infusion, clinician chosen from piperacillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, or meropenem

Intermittent bolus, clinician chosen from piperacillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, or meropenem

10

Dulhunty, 2015

Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong

RCT

Yes

432 (212 vs 220)

64 vs 65

21 vs 20

Severe sepsis (Sepsis-2)

Mixed

β-Lactam (piperacillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, or meropenem)

Continuous infusion clinician chosen from piperacillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, or meropenem

Intermittent bolus clinician chosen from piperacillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, or meropenem

11

Laterre, 2015

Belgium

RCT

NR

28 (14 vs 14)

68 vs 65

17 vs 16

Pulmonary or abdominal infection in ICU

Mostly Gram-negative

β-Lactam (temocillin)

Loading dose (2 g) administered over 30 min in 50 mL of water for injection followed by infusion (6 g in 48 mL of water for injection infused at a rate of 2 mL/h)

2 g of temocillin (in 50 mL of water for injection) every 8 h injected over a 30 min period

12

Abdul, 2016

Malaysia

RCT

No

140 (70 vs 70)

54vs 56

21 vs 21

Severe sepsis (Sepsis-2)

Mostly Gram-negative

β-Lactam (cefepime, meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam)

aContinuous infusion

bIntermittent bolus

13

Zhao, 2017

China

RCT

No

50 (25 vs 25)

68 vs 67

19.4 vs 19.7

Severe sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-2)

Only Gram-negative

β-Lactam (meropenem)

Loading dose of 0.5 g of meropenem followed by a continuous infusion of 3 g/day

Initial dose of 1.5 g followed by 1 g for every 8 h

  1. P prolonged, I intermittent, RCT randomized control trial, NR not reported, SAPS II Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ICU intensive care unit
  2. aContinuous infusion: Cefepime: day 1—2 g intravenous (IV) loading dose (infused over 30 min) followed by 2 g IV (infused over 480 min) every 8 h; day 2 onwards—2 g IV (infused over 480 min) every 8 h. Meropenem: day 1—1 g IV loading dose (infused over 30 min) followed by 1 g IV (infused over 480 min) every 8 h; day 2 onwards—1 g IV (infused over 480 min) every 8 h. Piperacillin/tazobactam: day 1—4 g/0.5 g IV loading dose (infused over 30 min) followed by 4 g/0.5 g IV (infused over 360 min) every 6 h; day 2 onwards—4 g/0.5 g IV (infused over 360 min) every 6 h
  3. bIntermittent bolus: cefepime—2 g intravenous (IV) (infused over 30 min) every 8 h; meropenem—1 g IV (infused over 30 min) every 8 h; piperacillin/tazobactam—4 g/0.5 g IV (infused over 30 min) every 6 h