Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of reporting scores. Scores reported as median proportion (first, third quartiles)

From: Physical rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit: a scoping review of 117 studies

(i) Study design reporting (N = 117)

 

NMES (n = 17)

Passive/active (n = 18)

Cycling (n = 8)

Progressive mobility (n = 38)

Multi-component (n = 35)

Overall (n = 117)

CONSORT (n = 48)

64.59 (53.99, 81.36)

75.86 (65.52, 80.00)

80.00 (75.76, 87.88)

75.81 (48.39, 96.97)

79.07 (54.70, 87.10)

74.98 (54.84, 87.10)

STROBE (n = 55)*

83.33

64.24 (59.26, 77.78)

85.19 (70.00, 89.29)

77.99 (73.22, 86.44)

73.24 (64.29, 76.92)

75.00 (64.29, 86.21)*

SQUIRE (n = 14)

–

90.00

–

82.50 (70.00, 87.34)

85.00

82.50 (75.00, 87.5)

Overall (n = 117)*

66.67 (54.84, 83.33)

73.76 (62.07, 80.00)

82.60 (72.88, 88.58)

79.31 (70.37, 87.18)

74.19 (55.56, 86.67)

75.86 (62.50, 86.67)*

(ii) Overall CERT reporting (N = 87)

 

NMES (n = 17)

Passive/active (n = 16)

Cycling (n = 8)

Progressive mobility (n = 22)

Multi-component (n = 24)

Overall (n = 87)

CONSORT (n = 48)

47.98 (39.38, 61.53)

70.59 (57.14, 75.00)

58.54 (48.01, 65.79)

53.95 (45.24, 62.50)

48.69 (36.12, 55.26)

51.99 (41.57, 64.56)

STROBE (n = 30)

94.44

63.75 (54.79, 74.38)

87.5 (86.67, 100)

57.89 (52.63, 81.25)

58.82 (42.86, 77.78)

68.59 (55.56, 83.33)a

SQUIRE (n = 9)

–

90.00

–

47.37 (37.5, 60.53)

42.86

47.37 (42.86, 60.53)

Overall (n = 87)

50.00 (39.47, 70.27)

66.88 (56.70, 77.50)b

85.00 (62.16, 93.75)c, d, e

54.10 (47.37, 65.00)

50.00 (41.79, 59.17)

55.56 (44.74, 75.00)

(iii) Intervention and control group reporting with CERT (N = 57)

 

NMES (n = 16)

Passive/active (n = 8)

Cycling (n = 3)

Progressive mobility (n = 13)

Multi-component (n = 17)

Overall (n = 57)

Intervention (n = 57)

65.48 (61.11, 72.95)f

72.80 (68.34, 80.10)

68.42 (46.32, 76.19)

73.68 (57.89, 80.00)g

63.16 (47.37, 80.95)h

68.42 (55.56, 80.00)i

Control (n = 57)

26.90 (12.70, 63.16)

69.51 (59.41, 78.13)

42.11 (40.00, 63.16)

30.00 (10.53, 47.37)

36.84 (26.32, 47.37)

38.89 (21.05, 55.00)

  1. Summary of reporting scores by (i) study reporting by reporting guideline and intervention categories, (ii) intervention reporting by reporting guideline and intervention categories, (iii) intervention and control group reporting by intervention categories. *One cohort study could not be classified into an intervention category; its reporting data is included in the overall STROBE reporting and overall study reporting scores, respectively
  2. aStudies assessed with STROBE had significantly better CERT reporting compared to those assessed with CONSORT, p = 0.014
  3. bSitting/passive/active interventions reported significantly better than multicomponent interventions, p = 0.009
  4. c, d, eCycling interventions reported significantly better than NMES interventions, progressive mobility interventions, and multicomponent interventions, p = 0.012, p = 0.010, p = 0.002, respectively
  5. fNMES intervention groups reported significantly better than control groups, p < 0.001
  6. gProgressive mobility intervention groups reported significantly better than control groups, p < 0.001
  7. hMulticomponent intervention groups reported significantly better than control groups, p < 0.001
  8. iAcross all intervention categories, intervention groups reported significantly better than control groups (p < 0.001)
Back to article page

Journal of Intensive Care

ISSN: 2052-0492