Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of Intensive Care

Fig. 3

From: Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial

Fig. 3

Radar chart showing health-related quality-of-life assessment in our cohort. For the SF-36 test the higher score represents a better subjective health experience. The top left panel shows no difference in subjective health experience at 6 months between the high-flow group and the helmet group; however, patients that required endotracheal intubation reported worse subjective health experience compared to those who avoided endotracheal intubation (top right panel). The lower panel shows the EuroQoL five dimension five levels (EQ-5D-5L). The radar chart shows the percentage of patients reporting problems in each of the five dimensions. There was no difference between the high-flow and the helmet group (bottom left panel); however, a higher percentage of patients that needed endotracheal intubation reported impairment in each of the five dimensions, compared to the patients that avoided endotracheal intubation (bottom right panel)

Back to article page