Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Intensive Care

Fig. 2

From: Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial

Fig. 2

Radar chart showing pulmonary function tests at 6 months in our cohort. Both patients treated with Helmet NIV and high-flow had reduced performance at 6 months, but there was no difference between the two groups (upper panel). Patients that did not require endotracheal intubation had pulmonary function tests at 6 months more similar to physiological values, compared to patients that required endotracheal intubation (lower panel)

Back to article page