Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariable comparisons of cases with favorable and unfavorable neurological outcomes

From: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with temperature management could improve the neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide multicenter observational study in Japan

Variables

Favorable outcomes (CPC 1–2; n = 125)

Unfavorable outcomes (CPC 3–5; n = 852)

Univariate P value

Multivariable P value

OR (95% CI)

Age (years)

54 (45–65)

60 (49–70)

 < 0.001

0.001

0.978 (0.965–0.991)

Male (%)

102 (82%)

726 (85%)

0.288

0.215

0.723 (0.432–1.208)

BCPR (%)

62 (50%)

412 (48%)

0.848

0.541

0.885 (0.597–1.311)

SR (%)

96 (77%)

550 (65%)

0.006

0.013

1.828 (1.138–2.937)

ICPS (min)

46 (36–56)

55 (45–66)

 < 0.001

0.946

1.000 (0.998–1.002)

Cardiogenic cause (%)

113 (90%)

751 (88%)

0.550

0.836

0.928 (0.460–1.873)

TTM (%)

75 (60%)

396 (46%)

0.005

0.021

1.588 (1.072–2.354)

  1. P values < 0.05 were bolded
  2. Values are median (interquartile range) or n (%) of cases
  3. CPC Glasgow–Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BCPR bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, SR shockable rhythm, ICPS interval from collapse to pump start, TTM target temperature management