Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences of clinical question or recommendation between J-SSCG2020 and SSCG2021

From: New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020

J-SSCG2020

SSCG2021

qSOFA score

 

 Introduce as one of the screening tools

Recommend against using qSOFA as a single screening tool

Adrenaline in patients with sepsis/septic shock

 

 Suggest against using adrenaline as a second-line vasopressor

Suggest adding adrenaline as the third line agent of vasopressor

Guiding resuscitation

 

 Suggest using lactate levels as an indicator for initial resuscitation

Suggest guiding resuscitation to decrease serum lactate and capillary refilling time

Renal replacement therapy for hemodynamically unstable patients

 Continuous RRT should be used

No recommendation

Initiation of enteral nutrition

 

 Suggest initiating at an early period of acute phase (within 24–48 h)

Suggest early (within 72 h) initiation

Vitamin C in septic patients

 

 Suggest providing vitamin C

Suggest against using IV vitamin C

Mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

 

 Suggest using mechanical prophylaxis

Suggest against using mechanical VTE prophylaxis in addition to pharmacological prophylaxis

  1. J-SSCG Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock, SSCG Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guideline, qSOFA quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment