Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included trials

From: Neuromuscular blockade in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Trial author or trial name

Gainnier et al. [10]

Forel et al. [9]

ACURASYS trial [11]

Guervilly et al. [27]

ROSE trial [19]

Year

2004

2006

2010

2017

2019

Country

France

France

France

France

USA

NBMA vs control (patients)

28 vs 28

18 vs 18

177 vs 162

13 vs 11

501 vs 505

PaO2/FIO2 ratio and PEEP for inclusion (cm H2O)

< 150

> 5

< 200

< 150

> 5

100–150

> 5

< 150

> 8

Important exclusion criteria

NMBA use within 2 weeks

NMBA and steroids use within 2 weeks

Current continuous infusion of NMBA

Current continuous infusion of NMBA

Current continuous infusion of NMBA

Ventilator management strategy

Lung protective ARDS net protocol

Lung protective ARDS net protocol

Lung protective ARDS net protocol

Lung protective ARDS net protocol

Lung protective high PEEP strategy

Cisatracurium dose

Bolus of 50 mg, 5 μg/kg/min

Bolus 0.2 mg/kg, 5 μg/kg/min

Bolus of 15 mg, 37.5 mg/hour

Bolus of 15 mg, 37.5 mg/hour

Bolus 15 mg, 37.5 mg/hour

Assessment for an extra dose

Train-of-four

Train-of-four

Plateau pressure > 32

Train-of-four

No adjustment

Sedation goal

Ramsay 6

Ramsay 6b

Ramsay 6

Ramsay 6

RASS − 4, − 5 in the intervention group

RASS 0 to − 1 in the control group)c

Risk of bias

 Sequence generation

Low

low

Low

Low

Low

 Allocation concealment

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

 Blinding

Higha

Higha

Low

Higha

Higha

 Withdrawal

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

 Selective outcome

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

 Free of other bias

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

 Overall

High

High

Low

High

High

  1. aRisk was high because nurses are not blinded to the intervention group
  2. bRamsay scale (1–6) 6 no response [28]
  3. cRASS score (+ 4 to − 4) 0 to − 1: alert and calm, drowsy [29]