Skip to main content

Table 2 Evidence profile

From: Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administration in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Certainty assessment No. of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations TXA Placebo Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Mortality from any cause (low RoB)
4 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 883/4940 (17.9%) 936/4844 (19.3%) RR 0.93 (0.85 to 1.01) 14 fewer per 1000 (from 29 fewer to 2 more) High
Critical
Poor neurological outcome (low RoB)
3 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None 52/313 (16.6%) 67/306 (21.9%) RR 0.76 (0.55 to 1.06) 53 fewer per 1000 (from 99 fewer to 13 more) Moderate
Critical
Ischemic or thromboembolic complications (low RoB)
2 Randomized trials Not serious Seriousb Not serious Very seriousc None 69/4733 (1.5%) 63/4632 (1.4%) RR 0.68 (0.12 to 3.93) 4 fewer per 1000 (from 12 fewer to 40 more) Very low
〇〇〇
Critical
Hemorrhagic complications (bleeding, low RoB)
1 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very seriousc None 16/4613 (0.3%) 22/4514 (0.5%) RR 0.71 (0.37 to 1.35) 1 fewer per 1000 (from 3 fewer to 2 more) Low
〇〇
Critical
  1. CI confidence interval, RR risk ratio, RoB risk of bias
  2. Reasons of downgrade are as follows:
  3. aSample size is smaller than optimal information size. In addition, 95% CI is wide
  4. bI2 value is high
  5. cSample size is smaller than optimal information size. In addition, 95% CI is very wide