Skip to main content

Table 2 Evidence profile

From: Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid administration in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Certainty assessment

No. of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

No. of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

TXA

Placebo

Relative (95% CI)

Absolute (95% CI)

Mortality from any cause (low RoB)

4

Randomized trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

883/4940 (17.9%)

936/4844 (19.3%)

RR 0.93 (0.85 to 1.01)

14 fewer per 1000 (from 29 fewer to 2 more)

High

Critical

Poor neurological outcome (low RoB)

3

Randomized trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Seriousa

None

52/313 (16.6%)

67/306 (21.9%)

RR 0.76 (0.55 to 1.06)

53 fewer per 1000 (from 99 fewer to 13 more)

Moderate

Critical

Ischemic or thromboembolic complications (low RoB)

2

Randomized trials

Not serious

Seriousb

Not serious

Very seriousc

None

69/4733 (1.5%)

63/4632 (1.4%)

RR 0.68 (0.12 to 3.93)

4 fewer per 1000 (from 12 fewer to 40 more)

Very low

〇〇〇

Critical

Hemorrhagic complications (bleeding, low RoB)

1

Randomized trials

Not serious

Not serious

Not serious

Very seriousc

None

16/4613 (0.3%)

22/4514 (0.5%)

RR 0.71 (0.37 to 1.35)

1 fewer per 1000 (from 3 fewer to 2 more)

Low

〇〇

Critical

  1. CI confidence interval, RR risk ratio, RoB risk of bias
  2. Reasons of downgrade are as follows:
  3. aSample size is smaller than optimal information size. In addition, 95% CI is wide
  4. bI2 value is high
  5. cSample size is smaller than optimal information size. In addition, 95% CI is very wide