Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of international in-hospital cardiac arrest cohorts

From: Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial

Region

Reference

Sample size

Witnessed (%)a

Location: ICU, CCU, OR (%)

Mean age (years)a

Female (%)a

VF/VT (%)a

ROSC (%)a

Survival to hospital discharge (%) a

Current study

 Total

900

100

100

57

61

18

55

42

 CFA

450

100

100

57

61

18

67

54

 Control

450

100

100

58

60

21

42

28

ANZ b

[51]

1733

80

NR

NR

36

31

46

25

Austria

[44]

1041

NR

96

64

37

39

NR

36c

Brazil

[38]

89

100

100

59

48

15

71

9

China

[49]

2712

NR

7

62

32

57

36

9

Hong Kong

[50]

431

60

17

71-74d

38

6

38

5

India

[56]

105

100

100

51

25

5

38

1

Iran

[7]

        

 Total

80

100

100

61

61

58

54

NR

 CFA

40

100

100

60

55

58

73

 Control

40

100

100

63

66

58

35

Iran

[36]

80

100

NR

67

52

NR

56

 

Iran

[37]

600

NR

26

NR

42

NR

45

3

Iran

[35]

206

NR

31

54

41

NR

20

5

Ireland

[41]

741

75

42

66

32

NR

56

18

Ireland

[42]

63

87

11

74

37

NR

73

27

Japan

[46]

491

77

25

71

38

28

65

28e

Norway

[43]

302

85

1

70

36

NR

54

25

Taiwan

[47]

110

NR

NR

67

29

14

67

18

Taiwan

[48]

702

50

21

67

39

88

58

6

Turkey

[45]

134

NR

32

67

51

18

49

13

UAE

[66]

685

NR

46

57

34

9

38

8

USA

[54]

14,720

86

51

68

43

25

44

17

USA

[39]

16,245

88

NR

NR

NR

NR

52

23

USA

[59]

25,006

72

37

NR

42

17

50

15

USA

[53]

84,625

100

100

66

42

21

43

17

USA

[60]

471,962

NR

NR

NR

48

NR

NR

18

USA

[40]

235,959

NR

NR

51

42

NR

NR

30

  1. IHCA in-hospital cardiac arrest, ICU intensive care unit, CCU cardiac care unit, OR operating room, VF ventricular fibrillation, VT ventricular tachycardia, CFA Cardio First Angelâ„¢, NR not reported, ANZ Australia and New Zealand, UAE United Arab Emirates, USA United States of America
  2. aNumbers rounded to nearest whole number
  3. bMeta-analysis of studies from Australia and New Zealand
  4. cDuration of survival not specified. Additionally, survival only reported for those with good neurological outcome defined as Glasgow–Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC) 1 and 2. CPC 1 indicates good capability, CPC 2 indicates slight disability, CPC 3 indicates severe disability, CPC 4 indicates coma or vegetative state, CPC 5 indicates cerebral death. CPC score of 1 or 2 was considered favorable, while a score of 3, 4, or 5 indicated an unfavorable functional neurological outcome
  5. dOnly range reported
  6. e30-day survival. Survival to hospital discharge not reported