Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: The practice of tracheostomy decannulation—a systematic review

Author

Country

Year of publication

Type of study

Category of patients

Number of patients

Age (years)

Duration of MV (days) prior to decannulation

Surgical/PCT

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Graves A et al. [11]

USA

1995

Prospective single centre

Chronic neurological illness

20

58

44–54

NA

1. Ventilation for 4 weeks

2. Successfully weaned off for 48 h

3. Minute ventilation <10 L/min

4. RR <12

5. SaO2 >90% (0.4 FiO2)

NA

Bach et al. [12]

USA

1996

Prospective single centre

Chronic neurological illness

49

24–62

287–2224

NA

Medically stable

Afebrile

N WBC counts

Not receiving IV antibiotics

Cognitively intact Not on narcotics/sedation

Peak cough flow (PCF)

PaO2 >60 mmHg

SaO2 >92%

N PaCO2 ± ventilation and use of manually/mechanically assisted coughing

NA

Ceriana et al. [8]

Italy

2003

Prospective single centre

Non-respiratory, 58%

Chronic respiratory failure, 40%

72

59–77

8–72

Mainly surgical

Clinical stability

Absence of psychiatric disorders

Effective cough (MEP ≥40 cmH2O)

PaCO2 <60 mmHg

Adequate swallowing (evaluated by gag reflex or blue dye test)

No tracheal stenosis endoscopically

Spontaneous breathing ≥5 days.

NA

Leung et al. [19]

Australia

2003

Retrospective single centre

Respiratory, 35%

Neurological, 35%

Trauma, 17%

100

65

25

Surgical, 47

PCT, 53

Not mentioned

NA

Tobin et al. [13]

Australia

2008

Prospective single centre

Medical, 40%

Surgical, 14%

Cardiothoracic, 25%

Neurosurgical, 23%

280

61.8

NA

However, 58 pts on prolonged MV

Surgical, 15

PCT, 85

Tolerate capping >24 h

Cough effective

(No need of suctioning).

Speech (with Passey–Muir valve).

NA

Stelfox et al. [24]

USA

2008

Questionnaire-based study

Multicentre

(118 centres)

Stroke, 166(24)

Respiratory failure, 159(23)

Trauma, 168(24)

Abdominal aortic aneurysm, 182(27)

675 case scenarios

NA

NA

However, majority physicians were from acute care.

NA

NA

NA

Choate et al. [14]

Australia

2009

Prospective single centre

Medical, 190

Surgical, 362

Trauma, 429

981

35–77

9–25

Surgical, 77%

PCT, 23%

Weaned from ventilator

Normal gag reflex

Effective cough

Reason for TT resolved

Ability to swallow own secretions

SaO2 >90%

Tracheotomies by ENT surgeons were excluded

O Connor et al. [4]

USA

2009

Retrospective

single centre

Pneumonia, 25

Aspiration pneumonia or pneumonitis, 25 AECOPD, 25

Septic shock, 25

135

74(36–91)

45

NA

NA

NA

Chan LYY et al. [15]

Hong Kong

2010

Prospective single centre

Neurosurgical patients

32

49–80

13.32

NA

Hemodynamically stable

Body temp <38 °C

Inspired O2 ≤4 L/min

SpO2 >90%

Inability to produce voluntary cough on command

Full ventilator support

Upper airway obstruction confirmed by FOB

Fully alert and producing voluntary cough on command

Fenestrated TT in place

Marchese et al. [25]

Italy

2010

Retrospective questionnaire based Multicentre study

(22 centres)

Acute respiratory failure, 24

COPD, 34

Neuromuscular diseases, 28

Surgical, 11

Thoracic dysmorphism, 4

OSAS, 2

719

50–78

Not mentioned.

Majority patients with chronic diseases

Surgical, 34%

PCT, 66%

NA

NA

Budviewser et al. [20]

Germany

2011

Retrospective single centre

AECOPD, 63

Pneumonia, 38

Cardiac failure, 18

Sepsis, 8

ARDS, 7

384

60–74

38

PCT, 100%

Tolerates TT capping >24–48 h

Tracheostomy retainer (TR) successfully inserted ≥1h

NA

Shrestha KK et al. [9]

India

2012

Prospective single centre

Severe head trauma (GCS <8)

118

 

NA

NA

NA.

Gradual vs. abrupt decannulation compared

NA

Warnecke T et al. [16]

Germany

2013

Prospective single centre

Neurologically ill patients, like stroke, ICH, GBS, meningoencephalitis

100

 

7–33

NA

Weaned off ventilator

Assessment by CSE which includes:

Patient’s vigilance and compliance, cough, swallowing assessed by fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation (FESS) with FEES protocol steps. Each step to be passed for decannulation to be considered, like secretions, spontaneous swallows, cough, puree consistency and fluids.

NA

Kenneth B et al. [21]

USA

2014

Retrospective single centre

Critically ill obese BMI 41.9 ± 14.3

102

 

NA

Surgical, 74%

PCT, 26%

Data missing—2

NA

Malignancy or tracheostomies performed outside

Pandain V et al. [17]

USA

2014

Prospective single centre

NA

57

 

21

NA

1.TT size ≤4 preferably cuffless

2. Breathes comfortably with continuous finger occlusion of TT >1 min without trapping air, tolerate speaking valve during waking hours without distress, mobilize secretions

3. Suction frequency less than every 4 h

4. No sedation during capping

Not satisfying inclusion criteria

Guerlain J et al. [18]

France

2015

Prospective single centre

Postoperative head and neck cancer patients

56

 

Short-term (<3 days)

Surgical, 100%

NA

NA

Pasqua et al. [22]

Italy

2015

Retrospective single centre

Respiratory (COPD, ILD, OSAS), 33

Cardiac, 10

Abdominal surgery, 4

Orthopaedic, 1

48

 

91.61–215.5

NA

Clinical and hemodynamic stability

No evidence of sepsis

Expiratory muscle strength (MEP >50 cm H2O)

Absence of tracheal stenosis/granuloma

Normal deglutition

PaCO2 <50 mm Hg

PaO2/FiO2 >200

Absence of nocturnal oxyhemoglobin desaturation

Patient consent

NA

Cohen et al. [23]

Israel

2016

Retrospective single centre

Patients with ≥3 co-morbidities, 35%

49

 

10

PCT, 100%

Maturation of TT stoma

Normal vital signs

Effective coughing

Normal swallowing

Positive leak test

Age <18 years

Complications during initial TT placement

Decannulation process completed outside institute