Skip to main content

Table 1 The impact of the intensivist on patient outcome and cost in the adult intensive care unit

From: The impact of changes in intensive care organization on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness—a narrative review

Reference

Country

Design

Population

Year

Reduction in ICU LOS

Reduction in hospital LOS

Reduction in hospital mortality

Reduction in cost

Multz [1]

USA

Prospective

Medical

1998

Yes, <0.0001

Yes, <0.01

No

n/a

Dimick [2]

USA

Retrospective

Surgical

1994–1998

n/a

Yes, <0.05a

Yes, <0.001

Yes, 61%

Carson [3]

USA

Prospective

Medical

1996

No

No

No

n/a

Li [4]

USA

Retrospective

Mixed

1984

No

n/a

Yes, 0.01a

n/a

Reynolds [5]

USA

Retrospective

Medical

1986–1988

No

No

Yes, <0.01a

n/a

Brown [6]

Canada

Retrospective

Mixed

1984–1986

n/a

n/a

Yes, <0.01a

n/a

Manthous [7]

USA

Retrospective

Medical

1992–1994

Yes, <0.05

Yes, <0.05

Yes, 0.002a

n/a

Pronovost [8]

USA

Retrospective

Surgical

1994–1996

Yes, <0.05a

Yes, <0.05a

Yes, 0.05a

n/a

Baldock [9]

UK

Prospective

Mixed

1995–1998

n/a

n/a

Yes, 0.001

n/a

Rosenfeld [10]

USA

Prospective

Surgical

1996–1997

Yes, <0.01

No

Yes, 0.008a

Yes, 36%

Diringer [11]

USA

Retrospective

Neuro

1996–1999

Yes, <0.05

Yes, <0.05

Yes, 0.001

n/a

Blunt [12]

UK

Retrospective

Medical

2000

No

No

Yes, 0.001a

n/a

Hanson [13]

USA

Retrospective

Surgical

1994–1995

Yes, <0.05

Yes, <0.05

No

Yes, not quantified

Ghorra [14]

USA

Retrospective

Surgical

1996

No

n/a

n/a

n/a

Tai [15]

Singapore

Prospective

Medical

1993–1994

Yes, 0.01

No

n/a

n/a

  1. ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay, USA United States of America, n/a not applicable
  2. aRemains significant after adjustment for baseline disease severity