Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Outcomes of patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation

From: Epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill: a systematic review

Author, year [ref] ICU LOS (days, mean) Hospital LOS (days, mean) Stroke (%)
Seguin P, 2004 [50] 16 vs. 7 (p = 0.0001) 34 vs. 22 (p = 0.009) NA
Seguin P, 2006 [51] 22 vs. 10 (p < 0.001) 32 vs. 25 (p = 0.259) NA
Arora S, 2007 [52] 10 vs. 4a (NS) 47 vs. 22a (NS) NA
Christian SA, 2008 [26] 17.7 vs. 8.3 (p = 0.003) 32.1 vs. 28.5 (p = 0.68) NA
Meierhenrich R, 2010 [53] 30 vs. 17ab (p = 0.017) NA NA
Walkey AJ, 2011 [54] NA NA 2.6 vs. 0.7 (p < 0.0001)
Kanji S, 2012 [55] 10ac 24ac 0
Tongyaoo S, 2013 [56] NA NA 5.9 vs. 2.0d
  1. Atrial fibrillation vs. no atrial fibrillation.
  2. AF atrial fibrillation, LOS length of stay, NA not available, NS not significant.
  3. aMedian.
  4. bData focusing on septic shock patients.
  5. cData with new-onset AF alone.
  6. d p value not provided.