Open Access

Complement, thrombotic microangiopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation

Journal of Intensive Care20142:61

DOI: 10.1186/s40560-014-0061-4

Received: 18 September 2014

Accepted: 17 October 2014

Published: 31 December 2014

Abstract

In the blurring boundaries between clinical practice and scientific observations, it is increasingly attractive to propose shared disease mechanisms that could explain clinical experience. With the advent of available therapeutic options for complement inhibition, there is a push for more widespread application in patients, despite a lack of clinically relevant research. Patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) frequently exhibit complement activation and share the clinical consequences of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and microvascular thrombosis. However, they arise from very different molecular etiologies giving rise to cautious questions about inclusive treatment approaches because most clinical observations are associative and not cause-and-effect. Complement inhibition is successful in many cases of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, greatly reducing morbidity and mortality of patients by minimizing thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and microvascular thrombosis. But is this success due to targeting disease etiology or because complement is a sufficiently systemic target or both? These questions are important because complement activation and similar clinical features also are observed in many DIC patients, and there are mounting calls for systemic inhibition of complement mediators despite the enormous differences in the primary diseases complicated by DIC. We are in great need of thoughtful and standardized assessment with respect to both beneficial and potentially harmful consequences of complement activation in these patient populations. In this review, we discuss about what needs to be done in terms of establishing the strategy for complement inhibition in TMA and DIC, based on the current knowledge.

Keywords

Complement Blood coagulation Thrombotic microangiopathy Disseminated intravascular coagulation Hemolytic uremic syndrome Thrombocytopenia Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia Acute kidney injury

Introduction

The complement and coagulation systems are considered to be descended from a common ancestral system, more than 400 million years ago [1],[2]. The common feature of these two cascade systems is that both systems are activated by common activators or host conditions [3]. Both systems contain a series of serine protease-mediated reactions, and there is evidence for networking crosstalk with shared activators and inhibitors. Members of each cascade interact either directly or indirectly. Upon bacterial infection, acute blood loss, trauma with tissue injury, malignancy, and many other underlining diseases, both the coagulation and complement systems are activated in patients and animal models. If these processes escape from their tight and localized control, it may lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ failure, which is a major contributor to high mortality.

Review

Cross talk between complement and coagulation systems

The interplay between the two systems has been studied for decades [4]-[7], and this review will highlight the more current literature (Figure 1). Multiple components of the complement cascade have the capacity to alter the phospholipid composition of the outer membranes of cells. The terminal complement complex (TCC or C5b-9 complex) can flip phosphatidylserine from the internal leaflet to the cell exterior surface, thereby providing a negatively charged surface necessary to support the coagulation cascade. Complement C3a induces platelet activation and aggregation [8]. Before activation, the outer leaflets of cell and platelet membranes normally do not contain negatively charged phospholipids, whereas abundant phosphatidylserine becomes available after activation and these surfaces support coagulation. Cell activation will also release granular contents, which generally enhance pro-coagulant responses, and release of microparticles will provide extra surfaces for clot formation.
Figure 1

Crosstalks between coagulation, fibrinolysis and complement systems. The coagulation cascade is roughly divided into TF pathway and contact activation. The TF pathway is well known to get activated by TCC, trauma, and some cytokines. Both pathways will merge at FXa level, which will generate thrombin. Thrombin is one of the most potent activator of platelets. Upon platelet activation, medium-size polyphosphate in the platelet granules will be released, which can induce contact activation. FXIIa can activate the classical complement pathway. FXIIa can activate plasma kallikrein, which in turn can activate both C3 and C5. Other members of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, such as FSAP, thrombin and plasmin can independently activate both C3 and C5. DAMPs, immune complex and PAMPs are known to activate the classical complement pathway. PAMPs and apoptotic cells will activate lectin pathway. PAMPs will trigger alternative pathway activation, all leading to C3 activation, which will activate C5. C3a and C5a will recruit and activate leukocytes, as well as induce platelet activation and aggregation, inducing thrombosis and inflammation, which are known to further enhance coagulation. C5b will lead to TCC formation, which not only lyse microorganisms but also lyse host cells, which will release DAMPs. TCC will induce TF pathway, induce platelet activation, and enhance coagulation by negatively charged phospholipid surfaces.

Binding of C1q to platelets induces the expression of integrins and P-selectin [9]. The platelet and C1q interaction seemed to be more complicated than just moderate and transient upregulation of P-selectin. Pre-incubation of platelets with C1q, on the other hand, will diminish collagen-induced upregulation of P-selectin, but the pre-incubation is reported to potentiate the collagen-provoked production of reactive oxygen species. This paradoxical C1q modulation of platelet that is observed in vitro may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of many complement diseases, given that the role of platelet not only resides in hemostasis but platelet also interact with white blood cells and modulate immune and inflammatory reactions.

On endothelial cells, complement effectors will change the cell properties from anti-coagulant to pro-coagulant. Complement C5a can induce/increase tissue factor expression in various cell types, including endothelial cells [10], and TCC or C1q will upregulate several adhesion molecules.

Thrombin, the end-product of the coagulation cascade, has considerable capacity to accelerate activation of both pathways by forming positive feedback loops. Thrombin generates C5a, a powerful anaphylatoxin, in C3 null mice lacking C3 convertase [11], and C5a induces tissue factor activity on human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Similarly, immunoblockade of C5 activation reduces microparticle-associated tissue factor activity and antigen as a consequence of Neisseria meningitides, the cause of bacterial meningitis [12]. Activation of complement was shown to decrypt encrypted tissue factor [13]. Activation of platelets will induce its granular release. One of the most abundant substances is polyphosphate. Platelet polyphosphate is much shorter than microbial long-chain polyphosphate, and platelet polyphosphate is demonstrated to exert contact activation of blood coagulation [14].

Kallikrein and factor XIIa can cleave complement components. Plasmin, the most powerful serine protease of the fibrinolytic system, was also shown to be capable of cleaving both C3 and C5, and the cleavage products are biologically active [15].

Factor VII-activating protease (FSAP), also known as plasma hyaluronan binding protein, is a circulating serine protease believed to activate blood coagulation factor VII and single-chain pro-urokinase [16], although activation of factor VII is questioned [17]. FSAP zymogen is notoriously unstable and can be activated by histones and nucleosomes arising from necrotic or apoptotic cells. Trauma patients have high levels of these circulating damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMPs) molecules, and FSAP is activated in patients with multiple traumas [18]. Complement proteins form complexes with FSAP and FSAP can cleave C3 and C5 to generate the C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins [15].

In addition to the direct molecular links between the coagulation and complement systems, both systems are intimately linked to inflammation. Activation of the complement and coagulation systems is capable of independently augmenting inflammatory responses, which in turn can potentiate both complement and coagulation activation. Endothelial cells play major roles in inflammation, including endothelial cell activation and injury/dysfunction. Given the abundant cross talk between coagulation and complement systems, it seems unlikely that one will be activated without the other. The expectation is that complement will be activated in almost all thrombotic disorders, including DIC and TMA, both of which can develop with thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and microvascular thrombosis. Thus, some groups of experts in the field place DIC in the list of TMA in a broader sense. However, in this article, DIC will be considered to be distinct from the TMAs and will be included in the list of differential diagnoses because most cases are distinguishable based on clinical presentation and laboratory findings (Figure 2). However, as occurs many times in clinical practice, these grouping designations still present a challenge in a small number of patients, especially in the presence of overlapping clinical features.
Figure 2

Venn diagram of thrombotic microangiopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation. As described in the text, the authors used the term “TMA”, which excludes DIC. The most popular thrombotic microangiopathy is HUS, which involves Shiga toxin. Atypical HUS is caused by chronic, uncontrolled, and excessive activation of complement-inducing platelet activation, endothelial injury, white cell recruitment, and activation, leading to TMA. Most cases of TTP arise from inhibition of the enzyme ADAMTS13, a metalloprotease responsible for cleaving large multimers of von Willebrand factor. A rare form of TTP is caused by genetically inherited dysfunction of ADAMTS13. This form is called Upshaw-Schülman syndrome. DIC is not a distinct disease entity. It occurs as a secondary complication of many different disorders, including sepsis, trauma, cancer, obstetric complications, and others.

Thrombotic microangiopathy

TMA involves several distinct etiologic pathological processes, but with shared clinical features that include thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and microvascular thrombosis, leading to end-organ ischemia, infarction, and dysfunction. The most common TMA is due to hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), caused by Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC). Infection with this toxigenic intestinal pathogen is a leading cause of acute renal failure in otherwise healthy children. EHEC can produce two Shiga-like exotoxins, Stx1 and Stx2, which are primary virulence factors causing organ injury [19]. These are ribosome-inactivating toxins, named after Dr. Kiyoshi Shiga, a pioneering clinical microbiologist born in Sendai, who made the landmark discovery at the turn of the 20th century that “toxic factors” from Shigella dysenteriae cause the clinical manifestations of bacillary dysentery (sekiri) [20]. Shiga toxin from S. dysenteriae is the prototype of this family of toxins, and Stx1 from EHEC differs by only one amino acid. Stx2 shares 56% amino acid sequence identity with Stx1, and the toxins are antigenically distinct [21]. Many clinical and animal studies have shown that Stx is necessary and sufficient for causing HUS, and for reasons that are not well understood, Stx2 is associated with more severe clinical consequences. Other, more rare, causes of TMA-associated HUS include invasive pneumococcal infection in pediatric patients [22],[23], atypical HUS, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), and others.

HUS

HUS arising during EHEC infection is a global public health problem. The massive EHEC outbreak due to contaminated school lunches in over 12,000 symptomatic adults and children in Sakai City, Osaka, Japan, in 1996 is one of the largest outbreaks known [24]. During the spring and summer of 2011, there was an outbreak of hemorrhagic colitis and HUS in Europe, originating in Germany, involving more than 4,000 cases, 852 patients with HUS and 54 deaths. It was caused by bean sprouts contaminated with an enteroaggregative E. coli strain that had acquired the ability to produce Stx2 [25]. Argentina has arguably the highest incidence of EHEC infection and pediatric HUS [26],[27] and contaminated ground beef, water, fresh produce, and other foods that causes recurrent global public health problems. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the human burden is approximately 110,000 infections annually in the United States alone [28] and is estimated at approximately 1.5 million cases globally with 3%–5% mortality and significant morbidity, including impaired renal function, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, pre-eclampsia, and other complications.

Clinically, HUS from any etiology includes a thrombotic component and is considered to be a TMA and distinct from DIC. However, DIC and TMA share extensive features, including thrombocytopenia, microvascular thrombosis, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and organ dysfunction, such as acute kidney injury. This is why some groups prefer to include DIC in the list of TMAs. In order to dissect the differences and similarities between DIC and TMA, the simplest approach is to examine animal models of TMA and DIC. Although there are multiple DIC animal models, animal models of TMA have significant challenges when the goal is to recapitulate human responses.

Injection of Stx into mice results in acute kidney injury but, unlike humans, the Stx challenge does not cause thrombocytopenia or TMA. This is thought to be due to the fact that murine glomerular endothelial cells do not express globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) glycolipid, the receptor for Shiga toxin [29]. As a result, glomerulopathy is not the main pathology in mice Stx model. Instead, mouse renal tubular cells express the receptor, leading to direct tubular lesions and kidney dysfunction. The mouse Stx model is a very good model for screening compounds that will neutralize Stx, for example. However, the mouse Stx model is not a good model for studying TMA because Stx does not cause TMA in mice. In order to circumvent this shortcoming, a murine Stx + LPS model was proposed, in which LPS is co-administered together with Stx [30]. This model does show complement activation, thrombocytopenia, and glomerulopathy, which are missing in the mouse Stx model, and there has been inferences that LPS must be a critical component in humans because it is true in mice. Unfortunately, most researchers in the field of EHEC-HUS have limited clinical or research experience with DIC. It has been well established for decades that LPS activates complement and causes DIC in animals and humans [31] and is clinically distinct from HUS.

Complement is activated in the LPS + Stx murine model and that coupled with evidence of complement in some EHEC patients [32] further suggested that complement must be driving the TMA in HUS.

Atypical HUS

Atypical HUS is a very rare progressive and life-threatening disease. Most patients have genetic abnormalities in the complement system, with most of the mutations found in the regulatory molecules of complement activation. It is thought that chronic, uncontrolled, and excessive activation of complement causes platelet activation, endothelial injury, white cell recruitment, and activation, all of which lead to TMA.

The role of complement activation in atypical HUS is very well established. The end results produce essentially the same clinical features, including consumptive thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, microvascular thrombosis, and TMA, with the exception of the time course. There is a treatment available, and it is very effective. The drug is called Eculizumab™, a humanized monoclonal antibody to complement 5 (C5). By binding to C5 and inhibiting its activation, the antibody ultimately prevents terminal complement complex (TCC) formation, providing the needed regulation of the complement pathway.

Is Stx-HUS driven by complement activation?

Since both HUS and aHUS present with reasonably similar clinical parameters, except for time course, in combination with the observation that complement is activated in the murine Stx + LPS co-injection model, there is thinking that complement activation is the common driver of coagulopathy in HUS, atypical HUS, and DIC [32]. This approach is intended to explain why HUS and atypical HUS have overlapping clinical presentations with consumptive thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, microvascular thrombosis, and TMA. Moreover, some patients with EHEC infection and HUS show evidence of complement activation. However, while there is no doubt that complement regulation is the villain in atypical HUS, the actual evidence for complement as a primary mediator of HUS or TTP is weak.

Eculizumab™ was approved for off-label use on a compassionate basis for use in a sub-group of patients with particularly refractory HUS during the 2011 EHEC outbreak in Europe (University Hospital of Bordeaux Regional Ethics Committee, and AFSSAPS). The results were mixed. While it is clear that the drug can be safely used in patients with HUS, it was not clear whether the treatment was effective or not [33]. This was a study done under remarkable conditions, performed in the middle of a public health emergency in several countries, so control groups were not possible and efficacy was difficult to conclude.

The question of complement involvement in HUS continues in part because there is no specific treatment available, other than general intensive supportive care, including dialysis and administration of intravenous fluids [34]. If complement activation plays a major role in HUS, then Eculizumab™ has the potential to become the first drug for the treatment of HUS associated with EHEC. Since EHEC-HUS is the most frequent among TMAs, specific treatment will be well received by patients, families, and physicians. Proof of efficacy would require randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials which will be very expensive and need a substantial commitment, given that most patients will be children and will present with acute and emergency courses. Even though the incidence of EHEC infection is estimated to be about 110,000 annually in the US, or 1.5 million globally, these are usually small outbreaks and the expected number of patients per one health care facility is typically small. A clinical trial will require many centers and a long period of time, further adding more costs. To make the matters even worse, HUS occurs in only about approximately 8% of EHEC cases, increasing the necessary enrollment number exponentially to the point that investors will be reluctant due to the limited market share and a limited return on a necessary substantial investment.

Non-human primate model of Stx-HUS

To help relieve this bottleneck, our laboratory asked the question of whether complement activation is required for the development of HUS. We used our non-human primate (NHP) model of Stx-induced HUS. The baboons receive a single intravenous bolus injection of Stx1 or Stx2, and development of pathophysiology is monitored over time [35]. The initial dose response study revealed that Stx1 at 10 ng/kg elicited mild transient changes; 50 ng/kg was severe (4/5 euthanized), and 100 ng/kg was lethal (5/5 euthanized). The dose-response for Stx2 could also be titrated, but the concentration range differed with a lethal dose at 50 ng/kg Stx2 (6/6 euthanized). Subsequent studies revealed that there are significant differences between the toxins in timing, inflammation responses, and kidney pathology, but they share the ability to induce HUS [36]-[38].

Thrombocytopenia is one of the hallmarks of HUS, monitored closely in patients, and we also find platelet levels to be a good marker of disease onset and severity in the baboon models. In our model, both Stx1 and Stx 2 induced thrombocytopenia in a dose-dependent manner in all subjects. The levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) also increased dose dependently. Microscopic examination of the kidneys revealed microthrombi in the glomerular capillary, mostly made up of platelets or platelets and RBC [36]. Glomerular endothelial cells were lost or markedly swollen, with frequent fibrin deposition on the luminal side of basement membrane in the renal glomerular capillaries. D-dimer levels increase indicating that both coagulation and fibrinolysis takes place. In plasma and urine, we measured two damage-associated molecular patterns markers of cell injury, HMGB1 and histones, and found that both are elevated in our model of Stx-HUS, yet complement was not activated [38]. We measured plasma TCC levels and found no increase despite development of HUS and renal injury, indicating that there is no substantial complement activation throughout the entire course of developing HUS pathophysiology. This demonstrates that complement activation is not required for the development of HUS. The lack of complement activation in the Citrobacter rodentium-Stx2 murine model, which has an intestinal bacteria secreting Stx2 [39], is supportive of this notion, but again, the mice do not develop TMA. The baboon studies are limited by the fact that the baboons receive a single Stx challenge, rather than prolonged exposure to toxin from an enteric bacterial infection, and humans might just simply differ in response.

Complement activation in DIC

In contrast to the baboon HUS model, plasma TCC levels elevate rapidly after intravenous challenge of baboons with Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria [38]. These bacteremia sepsis models are also consistent and reproducible models of DIC [40]. D-dimer increases, fibrinogen is consumed, and clotting times prolong. Similar to bacteremia, multiple trauma injuries are known to induce rapid activation of complement in humans [41],[42]. Since we know that uncontrolled activation of complement can induce atypical HUS, and that there is substantial complement activation in DIC models [43] as well as patients, it is conceivable that DIC patients may suffer the same pathology as that observed in patients with atypical HUS, in addition to DIC-specific pathology. Also, the extent of complement involvement may differ between each DIC patient. Since atypical HUS involves thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and acute kidney injury, there is a real possibility that Eculizmab™ may provide at least partial relief in certain sub-groups of DIC patients, including maybe burn injury patients [44].

It has been well over 100 years since complement was discovered. Complement activation in patients with DIC is well known, as is the crosstalk between the complement and coagulation systems. Given this networking, complement is activated in most patients with DIC, in which coagulation is most always activated. Due to the fact that complement is an immutable part of innate immunity involved in pathogen sensing, opsonization, and clearance, patients with infections may not be a good target population for a complement inhibiting strategy because we do not want to compromise innate immune response while the patients are trying to fight off the infections. However, the literature is conflicting, and whether C5b-9 is protective or detrimental remains to be determined [45]. Complement activation seemed less pronounced in isolated models of ischemia and reperfusion, whereas the responses are stronger in hemorrhagic trauma shock and multiple trauma injury models. The combination of traumatic brain injury and shock results in an immediate activation of coagulation and complement systems [46]. In humans, a number of reports indicate that the pathogenesis of spinal cord injury involves not only by primary mechanical trauma but also by secondary response, including complement activation [47]. Complement activation has been associated with acute neuroinflammation and secondary brain injury after severe trauma [48]. Mice lacking the receptors CR2/CD21 and CR1/CD35 are protected from adverse sequelae of experimental closed head injury [49].

Complement inhibitors, current and future

Eculizmab™ is already in the market and several clinical trials for a variety of complement-driven diseases are ongoing [50]. Anti-C5a was shown to ameliorate coagulation and fibrinolytic changes in a rat model of sepsis [51]. C1 inhibitor may have a beneficial effect in a primate sepsis model [52]. Several other complement inhibitors are under development. TT30 is a novel therapeutic fusion protein linking the C3 fragment-binding domain of human complement receptor type 2 (CR2/CD21) with the complement alternative pathway inhibitory domain of human factor H [53]. TT30 is designed to deliver cell surface-targeted regulation of the alternative pathway activity. It blocks ex vivo hemolysis of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria erythrocytes, while at the same time retaining the normal ability of the complement system to efficiently activate C3 through the classical and lectin pathways. The murine analog of TT30 was able to attenuate collagen-induced arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and tissue injury [54]. Finally, anti-C3b/iC3b monoclonal antibody 3E7 can block both complement-mediated hemolysis and C3 deposition in an in vitro model of alternative pathway-mediated hemolysis [55].

The urgent question is: can complement activation in DIC be a target for treatment or not? Given that Eculizmab™ is already in the market, and many other complement inhibitors are in the short pipeline, the question needs to be answered rather quickly. We would like to come to the correct answer, preferably with ample evidences using pre-clinical DIC models, before application to humans. The problem is that we do not have ample evidences available at this point. It is highly unlikely that it will be a simple yes/no answer that will apply to all DIC patients. Our prediction is that it probably depends on cases, timing, and everything else. So the question will most likely become “which subcategory of patients with DIC will benefit, and which will not?” These types of questions will demand an enormous amount of data to make successful translation.

Conclusions

Complement activation is observed in certain groups of TMA patients, as well as many patients with DIC. As the therapeutic options are expanding, more questions arise as to which patients may benefit from complement-targeted treatments. Since the complement pathway constitutes one of the most important innate immune effectors, it becomes critical to assess the role and the extent of complement activation in each patient. In order to get there, we need to study the extent of complement involvement in HUS, DIC, and TMA in pre-clinical animal models, as well as developing diagnostic methods for the assessment of patients.

Authors’ information

SK is a trained hematologist and research investigator. As a hematology consultant, he spent substantial efforts in providing expert advice in the field of blood coagulation, thrombosis, and hemostasis in critically ill. SK has been serving as a co-chair for the DIC subcommittee in Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. DSK and SK spent many years in both basic and translational medical research, involving thrombosis, hemostasis, sepsis, infections, and inflammation.

Abbreviations

DIC: 

disseminated intravascular coagulation

TMA: 

thrombotic microangiopathy

SIRS: 

systemic inflammatory response syndrome

TCC: 

terminal complement complex

C1q: 

complement component 1 q subcomponent

C3: 

complement component 3

C5: 

complement component 5

FSAP: 

factor seven activating protease

Stx: 

Shiga toxin

EHEC: 

enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

HUS: 

hemolytic uremic syndrome

p-HUS: 

HUS associated with invasive pneumococcal disease

TTP: 

thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

TF: 

tissue factor

Gb3: 

globotriaosylceramide (CD77)

BUN: 

blood urea nitrogen

DAMPs: 

damage-associated molecular patterns

CR2/CD21: 

complement receptor type 2

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the U.S. National Institute of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants R01AI102931, U19 AI062629, and R42 AI062095.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Boston University School of Medicine

References

  1. Krem MM, Di Cera E: Evolution of enzyme cascades from embryonic development to blood coagulation. Trends Biochem Sci 2002, 27: 67-74. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02007-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Loof TG, Morgelin M, Johansson L, Oehmcke S, Olin AI, Dickneite G, Norrby-Teglund A, Theopold U, Herwald H: Coagulation, an ancestral serine protease cascade, exerts a novel function in early immune defense. Blood 2011, 118: 2589-2598. 10.1182/blood-2011-02-337568View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rittirsch D, Flierl MA, Ward PA: Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol 2008, 8: 776-787. 10.1038/nri2402View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Amara U, Rittirsch D, Flierl M, Bruckner U, Klos A, Gebhard F, Lambris JD, Huber-Lang M: Interaction between the coagulation and complement system. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008, 632: 71-79.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Oikonomopoulou K, Ricklin D, Ward PA, Lambris JD: Interactions between coagulation and complement–their role in inflammation. Semin Immunopathol 2012, 34: 151-165. 10.1007/s00281-011-0280-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Liszewski MK, Atkinson JP: Too much of a good thing at the site of tissue injury: the instructive example of the complement system predisposing to thrombotic microangiopathy. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Progr 2011, 2011: 9-14. 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.9Google Scholar
  7. Markiewski MM, Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN, Mollnes TE, Lambris JD: Complement and coagulation: strangers or partners in crime? Trends Immunol 2007, 28: 184-192. 10.1016/j.it.2007.02.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamad OA, Back J, Nilsson PH, Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN: Platelets, complement, and contact activation: partners in inflammation and thrombosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012, 946: 185-205. 10.1007/978-1-4614-0106-3_11View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Skoglund C, Wettero J, Tengvall P, Bengtsson T: C1q induces a rapid up-regulation of P-selectin and modulates collagen- and collagen-related peptide-triggered activation in human platelets. Immunobiology 2010, 215: 987-995. 10.1016/j.imbio.2009.11.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ikeda K, Nagasawa K, Horiuchi T, Tsuru T, Nishizaka H, Niho Y: C5a induces tissue factor activity on endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost 1997, 77: 394-398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Huber-Lang M, Sarma JV, Zetoune FS, Rittirsch D, Neff TA, McGuire SR, Lambris JD, Warner RL, Flierl MA, Hoesel LM, Gebhard F, Younger JG, Drouin SM, Wetsel RA, Ward PA: Generation of C5a in the absence of C3: a new complement activation pathway. Nat Med 2006, 12: 682-687. 10.1038/nm1419View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ovstebo R, Hellum M, Aass HC, Troseid AM, Brandtzaeg P, Mollnes TE, Henriksson CE: Microparticle-associated tissue factor activity is reduced by inhibition of the complement protein 5 in Neisseria meningitidis-exposed whole blood. Innate Immun 2013, 20: 552-560. 10.1177/1753425913502099View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen VM, Hogg PJ: Encryption and decryption of tissue factor. J Thromb Haemost 2013,11(Suppl 1):277-284. 10.1111/jth.12228View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morrissey JH, Choi SH, Smith SA: Polyphosphate: an ancient molecule that links platelets, coagulation, and inflammation. Blood 2012, 119: 5972-5979. 10.1182/blood-2012-03-306605View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Amara U, Flierl MA, Rittirsch D, Klos A, Chen H, Acker B, Bruckner UB, Nilsson B, Gebhard F, Lambris JD, Huber-Lang M: Molecular intercommunication between the complement and coagulation systems. J Immunol 2010, 185: 5628-5636. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903678View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanse SM, Gallenmueller A, Zeerleder S, Stephan F, Rannou O, Denk S, Etscheid M, Lochnit G, Krueger M, Huber-Lang M: Factor VII-activating protease is activated in multiple trauma patients and generates anaphylatoxin C5a. J Immunol 2012, 188: 2858-2865. 10.4049/jimmunol.1103029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stavenuiter F, Dienava-Verdoold I, Boon-Spijker MG, Brinkman HJ, Meijer AB, Mertens K: Factor seven activating protease (FSAP): does it activate factor VII? J Thromb Haemost 2012, 10: 859-866. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04619.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stephan F, Hazelzet JA, Bulder I, Boermeester MA, van Till JO, van der Poll T, Wuillemin WA, Aarden LA, Zeerleder S: Activation of factor VII-activating protease in human inflammation: a sensor for cell death. Crit Care 2011, 15: R110. 10.1186/cc10131View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayer CL, Leibowitz CS, Kurosawa S, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ: Shiga toxins and the pathophysiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans and animals. Toxins, 4(11), 1261–128, 2012. doi:10.3390/toxins4111261. Toxins (Basel) 2012, 4: 1261-1287. 10.3390/toxins4111261View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Trofa AF, Ueno-Olsen H, Oiwa R, Yoshikawa M: Dr. Kiyoshi Shiga: discoverer of the dysentery bacillus. Clin Infect Dis 1999, 29: 1303-1306. 10.1086/313437View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Obrig TG: Escherichia coli Shiga toxin mechanisms of action in renal disease. Toxins (Basel) 2010, 2: 2769-2794. 10.3390/toxins2122769View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Copelovitch L, Kaplan BS: Streptococcus pneumoniae-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2008, 23: 1951-1956. 10.1007/s00467-007-0518-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shimizu M, Yokoyama T, Sakashita N, Sato A, Ueno K, Akita C, Ohta K, Kitano E, Hatanaka M, Kitamura H, Saikawa Y, Yachie A: Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen exposure as a cause of Streptococcus pyogenes-associated hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Clin Nephrol 2012, 78: 328-331. 10.5414/CN107205View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fukushima H, Hashizume T, Morita Y, Tanaka J, Azuma K, Mizumoto Y, Kaneno M, Matsuura M, Konma K, Kitani T: Clinical experiences in Sakai City Hospital during the massive outbreak of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 infections in Sakai City, 1996. Pediatr Int 1999, 41: 213-217. 10.1046/j.1442-200X.1999.4121041.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kunzendorf U, Karch H, Werber D, Haller H: Recent outbreak of hemolytic uremic syndrome in Germany. Kidney Int 2011, 80: 900-902. 10.1038/ki.2011.323View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopez EL, Contrini MM, Glatstein E, Ayala SG, Santoro R, Ezcurra G, Teplitz E, Matsumoto Y, Sato H, Sakai K, Katsuura Y, Hoshide S, Morita T, Harning R, Brookman S: An epidemiologic surveillance of Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection in Argentinean children: risk factors and serum Shiga-like toxin 2 values. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012, 31: 20-24. 10.1097/INF.0b013e31822ea6cfView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rivero MA, Passucci JA, Rodriguez EM, Signorini ML, Tarabla HD, Parma AE: Factors associated with sporadic verotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in children with diarrhea from the Central Eastern Area of Argentina. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011, 8: 901-906. 10.1089/fpd.2010.0800View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Crim SM, Iwamoto M, Huang JY, Griffin PM, Gilliss D, Cronquist AB, Cartter M, Tobin-D’Angelo M, Blythe D, Smith K, Lathrop S, Zansky S, Cieslak PR, Dunn J, Holt KG, Lance S, Tauxe R, Henao OL: Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food - foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 u.s. Sites, 2006–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014, 63: 328-332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Okuda T, Tokuda N, Numata S, Ito M, Ohta M, Kawamura K, Wiels J, Urano T, Tajima O, Furukawa K, Furukawa K: Targeted disruption of Gb3/CD77 synthase gene resulted in the complete deletion of globo-series glycosphingolipids and loss of sensitivity to verotoxins. J Biol Chem 2006, 281: 10230-10235. 10.1074/jbc.M600057200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keepers TR, Psotka MA, Gross LK, Obrig TG: A murine model of HUS: Shiga toxin with lipopolysaccharide mimics the renal damage and physiologic response of human disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006, 17: 3404-3414. 10.1681/ASN.2006050419View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Iskander K, Osuchowski M, Stearns-Kurosawa D, Kurosawa S, Stepien D, Valentine C, Remick D: Sepsis: multiple abnormalities, heterogenous responses, evolving understanding. Physiol Rev 2013, ᅟ: ᅟ. in pressGoogle Scholar
  32. Noris M, Mescia F, Remuzzi G: STEC-HUS, atypical HUS and TTP are all diseases of complement activation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012, 8: 622-633. 10.1038/nrneph.2012.195View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Delmas Y, Vendrely B, Clouzeau B, Bachir H, Bui HN, Lacraz A, Helou S, Bordes C, Reffet A, Llanas B, Skopinski S, Rolland P, Gruson D, Combe C: Outbreak of Escherichia coli O104:H4 haemolytic uraemic syndrome in France: outcome with eculizumab. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014, 29: 565-572. 10.1093/ndt/gft470View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wong CS, Mooney JC, Brandt JR, Staples AO, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Watkins SL, Tarr PI: Risk factors for the hemolytic uremic syndrome in children infected with Escherichia coli O157:H7: a multivariable analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2012, 55: 33-41. 10.1093/cid/cis299View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Collins V, Freeman S, Tesh VL, Kurosawa S: Distinct physiologic and inflammatory responses elicited in baboons after challenge with Shiga toxin type 1 or 2 from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 2010, 78: 2497-2504. 10.1128/IAI.01435-09View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Oh SY, Cherla RP, Lee MS, Tesh VL, Papin J, Henderson J, Kurosawa S: Distinct renal pathology and a chemotactic phenotype after enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Shiga toxins in non-human primate models of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Pathol 2013, 182: 1227-1238. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.12.026View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Collins V, Freeman S, Debord D, Nishikawa K, Oh SY, Leibowitz CS, Kurosawa S: Rescue from lethal Shiga toxin 2-induced renal failure with a cell-permeable peptide. Pediatr Nephrol 2011, 26: 2031-2039. 10.1007/s00467-011-1913-yView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee BC, Mayer CL, Leibowitz CS, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Kurosawa S: Quiescent complement in nonhuman primates during E. coli Shiga toxin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic microangiopathy. Blood 2013, 122: 803-806. 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490060View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Mallick EM, McBee ME, Vanguri VK, Melton-Celsa AR, Schlieper K, Karalius BJ, O'Brien AD, Butterton JR, Leong JM, Schauer DB: A novel murine infection model for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Clin Invest 2012, 122: 4012-4024. 10.1172/JCI62746View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Silasi-Mansat R, Zhu H, Popescu NI, Peer G, Sfyroera G, Magotti P, Ivanciu L, Lupu C, Mollnes TE, Taylor FB, Kinasewitz G, Lambris JD, Lupu F: Complement inhibition decreases the procoagulant response and confers organ protection in a baboon model of Escherichia coli sepsis. Blood 2010, 116: 1002-1010. 10.1182/blood-2010-02-269746View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Burk AM, Martin M, Flierl MA, Rittirsch D, Helm M, Lampl L, Bruckner U, Stahl GL, Blom AM, Perl M, Gebhard F, Huber-Lang M: Early complementopathy after multiple injuries in humans. Shock 2012, 37: 348-354. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182471795View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Muroya T, Kannan L, Ghiran IC, Shevkoplyas SS, Paz Z, Tsokos M, Dalle Lucca JJ, Shapiro NI, Tsokos GC: C4d deposits on the surface of RBCs in trauma patients and interferes with their function. Crit Care Med 2014, 42: e364-e372. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000231View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor FB Jr: Staging of the pathophysiologic responses of the primate microvasculature to Escherichia coli and endotoxin: examination of the elements of the compensated response and their links to the corresponding uncompensated lethal variants. Crit Care Med 2001, 29: S78-S89. 10.1097/00003246-200107001-00026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lippi G, Ippolito L, Cervellin G: Disseminated intravascular coagulation in burn injury. Semin Thromb Hemost 2010, 36: 429-436. 10.1055/s-0030-1254051View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ward PA: Role of C5 activation products in sepsis. ScientificWorld J 2010, 10: 2395-2402. 10.1100/tsw.2010.216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Sillesen M, Rasmussen LS, Jin G, Jepsen CH, Imam A, Hwabejire JO, Halaweish I, DeMoya M, Velmahos G, Johansson PI, Alam HB: Assessment of coagulopathy, endothelial injury, and inflammation after traumatic brain injury and hemorrhage in a porcine model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014, 76: 12-19. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aaa675View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson SL, Anderson AJ: Complement and spinal cord injury: traditional and non-traditional aspects of complement cascade function in the injured spinal cord microenvironment. Exp Neurol 2014, 258C: 35-47. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.04.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Fluiter K, Opperhuizen AL, Morgan BP, Baas F, Ramaglia V: Inhibition of membrane attack complex of the complement system reduces secondary neuroaxonal loss and promotes neurologic recovery after traumatic injury in mice. J Immunol 2014, 192: 2339-2348. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302793View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Neher MD, Rich MC, Keene CN, Weckbach S, Bolden AL, Losacco JT, Patane J, Flierl MA, Kulik L, Holers VM, Stahel PF: Deficiency of complement receptors CR2/CR1 in Cr2(−)/(−) mice reduces the extent of secondary brain damage after closed head injury. J Neuroinflammation 2014, 11: 95. 10.1186/1742-2094-11-95View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Riedl M, Fakhouri F, Le Quintrec M, Noone DG, Jungraithmayr TC, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Licht C: Spectrum of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathies: pathogenetic insights identifying novel treatment approaches. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014, 40: 444-464. 10.1055/s-0034-1376153View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Laudes IJ, Chu JC, Sikranth S, Huber-Lang M, Guo RF, Riedemann N, Sarma JV, Schmaier AH, Ward PA: Anti-c5a ameliorates coagulation/fibrinolytic protein changes in a rat model of sepsis. Am J Pathol 2002, 160: 1867-1875. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61133-9View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Jansen PM, Eisele B, de Jong IW, Chang A, Delvos U, Taylor FB Jr, Hack CE: Effect of C1 inhibitor on inflammatory and physiologic response patterns in primates suffering from lethal septic shock. J Immunol 1998, 160: 475-484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Atkinson C, Song H, Lu B, Qiao F, Burns TA, Holers VM, Tsokos GC, Tomlinson S: Targeted complement inhibition by C3d recognition ameliorates tissue injury without apparent increase in susceptibility to infection. J Clin Invest 2005, 115: 2444-2453. 10.1172/JCI25208View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Fridkis-Hareli M, Storek M, Mazsaroff I, Risitano A, Lundberg AS, Horvath CJ, Holers VM: Design and development of TT30, a novel C3d-targeted C3/C5 convertase inhibitor for treatment of human complement alternative pathway-mediated diseases. Blood 2011, 118: 4705-4713. 10.1182/blood-2011-06-359646View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. DiLillo DJ, Pawluczkowycz AW, Peng W, Kennedy AD, Beum PV, Lindorfer MA, Taylor RP: Selective and efficient inhibition of the alternative pathway of complement by a mAb that recognizes C3b/iC3b. Mol Immunol 2006, 43: 1010-1019. 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kurosawa and Stearns-Kurosawa; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.